carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
....that's my point! I've never done anything like this before, thus I think it only fair to have maybe been kindly warned with a pm message, rather than having the penalty imposed to the fullest degree of the law!
Need help from fellow Jazzfanz posters!
- Thread starter carolinajazz
- Start date
- Status
....that's my point! I've never done anything like this before, thus I think it only fair to have maybe been kindly warned with a pm message, rather than having the penalty imposed to the fullest degree of the law!
This isn't your first rodeo CJ. You've been around forever. You should know better.
None of the current (non-administrator) mods were mods at that point.
And it's convenient for CJ that he hasn't bothered to quote himself verbatim, so I will help out:
Stickler
Well-Known Member
It's absurd for so many reasons. Carolina is clearly in the wrong and it's bizarre that he thinks his posts are okay. Maybe he means: they're okay in comparison with some of the other things that go unpunished. Which is a very low standard for a person to have for himself. Also I have no idea what kind of help he's actually asking for from his fellow Jazzfanz posters. I found that pretty unclear.
Sloanfeld
Banned
My appeal was to Jason and he totally chose to ignore me then gave me my final warning for backseat moderating (like anyone gets banned for that) because I kept persisting (you know, rather than just dismiss my appeal). He's still in charge though, so it doesn't matter who's on the mod squad.
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
I'm looking for more than just moral support.....I was looking for outrage on the part of fellow Jazz posters who have a deep seated distaste for injustice! This support should be of the kind that is manifested by posts and/or pm messages to all current mods! There is strength in numbers! Our voices can be heard!
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
....in view of the fact that mods such as Jason can be tough nuts to crack....I would readily accept a reduction of 1 violation.....and then I would drop the subject and crusade, I promise!
Stickler
Well-Known Member
No thanks.
Sloanfeld
Banned
Now, why couldn't you just tell me that two years ago????????????
You and everyone else. But alas, we have this pesky process that we use to ensure that someone isn't just banned based on the whims of a single moderator.
Hopper
Banned
Kinda funny that everybuddy and his brutha can accuse CJ of bein a "racist" 24/7 with the mods indulgently toleratin it (if not participatin), but if CJ suggests that someone else (who aint even remotely connected to this board) could be racist, he's out of line. Go figure, eh?
Last edited:
Hopper, I support the process. I was one of the people who pushed the hardest to put it in place as opposed to the old unilateral system.
i too agree that posters should reside in a pocket of plausible deniability forever so they can continue to disrupt every thread they post in with literally no repercussions so the spineless moderators can feel like they're playing lawyer? or something?
great system. great process, great moderators, great message board, libertarian utopia
i could call you a ****** right now and you wouldn't do **** you ****ing coward
Hopper
Banned
Talkin for everybuddy, as usual, eh, Kicky? Ya forgets that my personal bottom-feeder, Clutch, don't wants me banned? Sure, I pay him to support me, but he could actually believe it, who knows? I gotz a idea, to settle this here question, eh?
You and Clutch, bottom-feedero a' bottom-feedero, debates the issue of who should autta be banned, you, or me. Then, I will be the sole judge of the winner. Whaddaya say!?
wait, wait, wait - what's happening here? where are all the reports for personal attack? you folks can't read or what - you don't see what he's called you? honestly.....
smh
- Status