What's new

Never Trump

Let me just say that I absolutely ignore anything you say about Hillary Clinton. It's a constant mission to prove that she is the dirtiest presidential candidate the world has ever seen. I see in you a culmination of everything the Republicans have been attempting for the last twenty five years (I'm an independent by the way), not to mention Julian Assange's sole purpose in life to drag Clinton's name through the dirt and screw with the most important election in the world. Almost everything you say about her is irrelevant or taken out of context or without knowing the details of the whole situation. If you had any balance at all, your one-sided tirade might actually be more effective.
Both major parties nominated horrible candidates if we measure them by the standards a reasonable person would use to evaluate the people in their life (honesty, integrity, fairness, consistency, etc.). The fact that you're perfectly fine with the one who claims she didn't know that the "c" beside certain paragraphs in government emails meant that the info was confidential pretty much says it all.

But on a positive note, we are in agreement on Trump. There was a time when I was trying to convince myself to vote for him. For me, a little bit of insider knowledge about the Trump University situation (which is an outright scam) compounded by his comments regarding the Hispanic judge who was assigned to the case were the straw that broke the camel's back.

In my opinion both these candidates are unrepentant power-hungry narcissistic liars. There is no circumstance under which I would ever cast a vote for either one of them.
 
Both major parties nominated horrible candidates if we measure them by the standards a reasonable person would use to evaluate the people in their life (honesty, integrity, fairness, consistency, etc.). The fact that you're perfectly fine with the one who claims she didn't know that the "c" beside certain paragraphs in government emails meant that the info was confidential pretty much says it all.

But on a positive note, we are in agreement on Trump. There was a time when I was trying to convince myself to vote for him. For me, a little bit of insider knowledge about the Trump University situation (which is an outright scam) compounded by his comments regarding the Hispanic judge who was assigned to the case were the straw that broke the camel's back.

In my opinion both these candidates are unrepentant power-hungry narcissistic liars. There is no circumstance under which I would ever cast a vote for either one of them.



I thought our politicians were awful in recent years, but ffs in a country of 300 million these two turkeys are the best you can come up with ???
 
This is a question?
giphy.gif
 
What's your point?
Everybody already #nevertrumps and everybody already #neverhillarys for largely the same reasons.

But thanks for shedding additional light on the we-have-a-****ty-choice-to-make decision before us.

Once again, an American presidential election cycle is dominated by "The Lesser of Two Evils" nonsense and people claiming the candidates are worse than ever. People still claiming to be moderates even though they talk like either Trump or Hillary, and will undoubtedly pull the same lever in the booth...
 
Once again, an American presidential election cycle is dominated by "The Lesser of Two Evils" nonsense and people claiming the candidates are worse than ever. People still claiming to be moderates even though they talk like either Trump or Hillary, and will undoubtedly pull the same lever in the booth...
I agree with this post except for the nonsense part. If these are not the worst two candidates to ever face off for the American presidency, please let us know who they were. Both of their approval ratings are below abysmal.
 
I agree with this post except for the nonsense part. If these are not the worst two candidates to ever face off for the American presidency, please let us know who they were. Both of their approval ratings are below abysmal.

There is nothing specially bad about Clinton. Just an establishment career politician like all others in recent history. The "lesser of two evils" argument is beyond nonsense, unless you're a demagogue like babe who thinks progressives are conducting a worldwide conspiracy to take your freedom.
 
There is nothing specially bad about Clinton. Just an establishment career politician like all others in recent history. The "lesser of two evils" argument is beyond nonsense, unless you're a demagogue like babe who thinks progressives are conducting a worldwide conspiracy to take your freedom.
Wrong. She's specially bad. That's why even the Dems don't like her, but most of them will hold their nose and vote.
 
I think the reason they are holding their nose is from all of the bull**** that comes out of Trumps mouth.
You don't think that it bothers people that she received a subpoena from the FBI and responded to it by destroying evidence? Can you name anyone else who has ever gotten away with that? I seriously can't comprehend how an extremely intelligent person like Siro (and many others) couldn't understand that this alone ought to disqualify her from the presidency. The reason that their logic is so skewed is that Trump is the alternative. Neither of these candidates would have a prayer against even a mediocre opponent.
 
There is nothing specially bad about Clinton. Just an establishment career politician like all others in recent history. The "lesser of two evils" argument is beyond nonsense, unless you're a demagogue like babe who thinks progressives are conducting a worldwide conspiracy to take your freedom.

Dude are you ****ing serious? They're is nothing especially bad about Clinton? LMAO


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You don't think that it bothers people that she received a subpoena from the FBI and responded to it by destroying evidence? Can you name anyone else who has ever gotten away with that? I seriously can't comprehend how an extremely intelligent person like Siro (and many others) couldn't understand that this alone ought to disqualify her from the presidency. The reason that their logic is so skewed is that Trump is the alternative. Neither of these candidates would have a prayer against even a mediocre opponent.

I don't disagree with you. But it's either Hillary or Trump. I'll take criminal over crazy any day of the week. And if you think Trump isn't a criminal too you are blind.
 
I don't disagree with you. But it's either Hillary or Trump. I'll take criminal over crazy any day of the week. And if you think Trump isn't a criminal too you are blind.
You don't disagree with me that her actions should disqualify her from the presidency and yet you are going to vote for her? And as crazy as it sounds, I completely understand your logic. I'm not blind. The only choice I can live with is a vote for Johnson. If, by some miracle, more people recognized this we could avoid either a Trump or a Clinton presidency.
 
Back
Top