da ThRONe
Active Member
Do you not think Portland does not regret not taking Michael Jordan in 1984. They did not need a shooting guard they had a young star named Clyde Drexler. Like now in 1984 Jordan was just a young kid with a lot of potential. So was Sam Bowie. Drexler became a 10 time all-star and Hall of Famer. As you know since then, you draft the best player available. If they find Exum or Smart is the bpa that does not mean Burke is gone. Right now Burke is our PG of the future, but you have leave your options open. Maybe you draft Exum then a team like the Fakers want him so bad, you trade him in a trade that the Jazz come out way ahead. Maybe you start with Burke as your starting PG and let the rookie back him up. Maybe you run a two point guard starting line-up. Maybe after a year, you see the rookie is not a bust you see what trade options you get for either one. Maybe you learn Exum is heads and shoulder better and you trade Burke. Just don't limit your options.
This is very selective. 1st hindsight is great. Of course if you had to choose Jordan knowing he'd be the consensus best player ever you take him no matter what. You don't have that luxury while drafting. Sam Bowie didn't help because of the injuries but he was thought of to be a dominate big man.
I think smart GM's do a little of both. Understanding that if there's a big difference in grades between to players you take the higher graded player regardless of fit. However if the grading is relatively close than you draft for fit. Building a team isn't just about putting the best athletes out there unless you can get Garnett/Pierce/Allen, James/Wade/Bosh, Bryant/O'Neal, or Jordan/Pippen. It's about fit, chemistry, and balance along with talent. Most markets aren't going to be able to snag crazy win it all with talent over fit type players unless they luck up and draft them.