What's new
By:

(not trying to be a provocateur) but it is September 11th

NAOS

NAOS

Well-Known Member
Among the many things I think about on Sept 11th is WTC building #7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=owyqt-8RnKI&NR=1
 
Destroying Building 7 fulfills what conceivable part of some secret master plan?
 
So the building 7 collapse didn't look anything like the controlled demolitions in the video. Obviously proving that it fell due to damage sustained during the WTC attack. <-- sarcasm

Again, why did building 7 have to fall if 9/11 was an inside job? Seems like running jets into the WTC would have been enough to accomplish whatever the evildoers had in mind.
 
Let's first look at the occupants of building 7.

Floor Occupant ----------------

28-45 Salomon Smith Barney
26-27 Standard Chartered Bank
25 Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
25 Department of Defense (DOD)
25 Central Intelligence Agency
24 Internal Revenue Service
23 Office of Emergency Management
22 Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
21 First State Management Group 1
9-21 ITT Hartford Insurance Group
19 National Association of Insurance Commissioners
Securities Valuation Office
18 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
13 Provident Financial Management
11-13 Securities and Exchange Commission
9-10 U.S. Secret Service
7-8 American Express Bank International
Click to expand...

Yeah there's no way any of those agencies would want to kill three birds with one stone.
 
Gameface said:
Destroying Building 7 fulfills what conceivable part of some secret master plan?
Click to expand...

I'm not a conspiracy guy.

I've just long held to the personal opinion that the whole thing was desperately under-investigated and, thus, poorly explained.
 
How about the group "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth"?
These are guys that are way more educated in these matters than most of us are, and even they say the way the buildings came down has nothing to do with a small jet engine fire that can't possibly burn hot enough to melt steel.
Here's a interview with Professor Steven Jones, who was fired from BYU after uncovering these facts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=089HDmOCrlU&feature=youtube_gdata_player
 
NAOS said:
I'm not a conspiracy guy.

I've just long held to the personal opinion that the whole thing was desperately under-investigated and, thus, poorly explained.
Click to expand...

So why wasn't it investigated more? Part of some cover-up or master plan?

Does a lack-luster investigation call even the known facts into question?
 
There was a memorial today, with 4 moments of silence, or something similar , one for each of the towers, and one each for the other two planes attacking DC. No moment of silence for building 7.
 
337685_544660088896998_842798641_o.jpg
 
leftyjace said:
Oh, I don't mind topics that actually matter. But isn't the prevalence of conspiracy theory shtick getting a bit tiring for you? I know it is for me.
Click to expand...

You do realize you can call any specific topic you want a "conspiracy theory" right?
Doesn't mean anything, or hold any water.

NAOS is asking questions that are absolutely relevant, and are no where rooted in conspiracy theory.

Fact, building 7 did actually collapse.

Fact, there's no possible way a steel skyscraper can collapse into it's own footprint because of office fires.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top