What's new

(not trying to be a provocateur) but it is September 11th

WTC_7_aerial_photo.jpg

attachment.php
 
Looks to me like WTC5 and WTC6 were positioned so that as debris from one and two collapsed upon itself, it was channeled directly into WTC7.

The only question remaining then, is how did they plan the perfect placement out so far in advance? There must be a pentagram design or something in there somewhere. Look hard, I know it's in there.
 
I just watched a BOSE acoustic wave clock radio commercial. Based on that evidence I submit that building 7 was the victim of acoustic wave technology.
 
Ok, so there is a logical explanation for the 100's of suspicious events, or parts of the 911 conspiracies (or at least there are claims of logical explanations).

What I want to know is.... Why are there so many red flags and suspicious parts to the story? Its like playing Wack a Mole with all the with all the poorly constructed explanations.
 
Ok, so there is a logical explanation for the 100's of suspicious events, or parts of the 911 conspiracies (or at least there are claims of logical explanations).

What I want to know is.... Why are there so many red flags and suspicious parts to the story? Its like playing Wack a Mole with all the with all the poorly constructed explanations.

Are you confusing people not being sure and proposing answers with people making up bad lies to cover up what would be a multi-billion dollar effort involving thousands of co-conspirators?
 
Ok, so there is a logical explanation for the 100's of suspicious events, or parts of the 911 conspiracies (or at least there are claims of logical explanations).

What I want to know is.... Why are there so many red flags and suspicious parts to the story? Its like playing Wack a Mole with all the with all the poorly constructed explanations.

Easily explained by the fact that we have never seen 2 airliners full of fuel crash into 2 adjoining buildings over 100 stories tall before. Everything we know about engineering and physics had never been tested in such a scenario. Of course we were going to see things we had never seen before giving us reason to scratch our heads and wonder exactly what happened. Unfortunately, there are enough people out there that wear tinfoil hats to give any conspiracy theory traction.
 
Easily explained by the fact that we have never seen 2 airliners full of fuel crash into 2 adjoining buildings over 100 stories tall before. Everything we know about engineering and physics had never been tested in such a scenario. Of course we were going to see things we had never seen before giving us reason to scratch our heads and wonder exactly what happened. Unfortunately, there are enough people out there that wear tinfoil hats to give any conspiracy theory traction.

I propose the UN headquarters to conduct a controlled experiment on. Is it tall enough?
 
Easily explained by the fact that we have never seen 2 airliners full of fuel crash into 2 adjoining buildings over 100 stories tall before. Everything we know about engineering and physics had never been tested in such a scenario. Of course we were going to see things we had never seen before giving us reason to scratch our heads and wonder exactly what happened. Unfortunately, there are enough people out there that wear tinfoil hats to give any conspiracy theory traction.

Let's make sure we also completely dismiss the thousands of highly educated members of "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" as well, that offer many subjective explanations, with no mention of conspiracy.
Unfortunately, you folks that don't listen to the facts are in the minority here.
To this day, I've never met one person (that's even slightly politically astute) that would actually agree with NIST's offical report, once hearing the facts that these scientists introduce.

Well that would exclude my father that's in his mid-fifties now, and still thinks the presidential position is actually a place of power and makes decisions.

Because we all know..... our government NEVER lies to us :-)
 
Let's make sure we also completely dismiss the thousands of highly educated members of "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" as well, that offer many subjective explanations, with no mention of conspiracy.
Unfortunately, you folks that don't listen to the facts are in the minority here.

In that case I change my mind. The majority is always right and who am I to go against them?
 
Back
Top