Now I hope the Jazz make a significant move just to make Jazz_junkie look like more of an ***.
Nothing.nada.zip.
- Thread starter Jazz_junkie
- Start date
Also getting no rebounds, no blocks, no assists, no steals, not being clutch, no scoring! Al does those things. Stop equating Big Al as the worst big on the team to being worse than Raja. Two very, very different things.
I hope they do just to improve the team. Come on KOL work some magic.
Weezur
Well-Known Member
Who is that a shot at? just curious.
7StraightIsGreat
Well-Known Member
I desperately want to see Sap or Jefferson moved for the right pieces, but not at the expense of losing Hayward, Burks, or future cap flexibility because we take on a bad contract.
I'll stay on the bandwagon deal or no deal.
I'll stay on the bandwagon deal or no deal.
Right on! Here! Have this seat right next to me. Ignore my chubby.
DutchJazzer
Banned
al does stats. but has mostly no positive impact on the team game.
Neither does Raja AND he has no stats...
Weezur
Well-Known Member
"I'd prefer Raja Bell over Al Jefferson"
DutchJazzer
Banned
no jefferson means more kanter and favors.
more kanter more favors = more wins now and in the future.
more raja = less minutes for williams, foye, hayward burks and caroll
imho more kanter more favors lead to more wins now and in the future.
than less wukuans foye hayward and the others.
in short 34 minutes from jeffrersuck more to ditrubite between favors and kanter is a greater benefit.
than 22 minutes less of our wings and more of bell.
i'm not saying bell is a better player than jefferson.
i'm just saying for this team i'd trade 22 minutes of bell for 34 minutes of al
More Bell means less Hayward and Burks.
More Bell means more locker room poison.
More Bell means more Drama
More Bell means less points, rebounds, assists, steals...
I would not trade 34 minutes of Big Al for 22 minutes of Raja.
Jazz_junkie
Member
Me too
Sneakers
Well-Known Member
Well they'll get the reigns next year. I'm excited for the draft, means we'll be looking for the PGOTF with 2 picks... how it should be done. Bledsoe was not the answer, i've been saying it all along, he was simply the white whale that became overhyped in all your minds. Like you HAD TO have him, we'll be better... I can say this now because no trade happened! (but you'll notice I've always been cosistent)
DutchJazzer
Banned
assuming bell takes 8 shots per game.
means more shots for kanter favors millsap who ar emore efficient scorers.
i know less Hayward and burks is bad.
but i'd rather have 34 minutes more of favors kanter(maybe couple of minutes more sap), then 22 minutes less burks hayward.
ofcourse i'd want to say burks hayward kanter favors all avg 20-30 minutes per game(but we are tlaking a hypothetical trade right? jeff for bell)
more bell means more minutes and more rebounds and shots for kanter favors and millsap.
jefferson takes 16 shots per game (rounded up from 15.7)
bell i assume would take 8 shots per game most of them comming from marvin burks and hayward.
but that leaves a net worth of 8 shots for the bigs.
Weezur
Well-Known Member
Really hope that's true. I think Milsap is one of the best PF's we can get and that also gives Favors a chance to anchor the defense.
midnight_hwy
Well-Known Member
Well, that was pretty disappointing. Nada.zip.zilch... no trades as was expected.
DutchJazzer
Banned
not as expected if i'm not mistaken the poll last time i checked had 53% of voters expecting a trade