LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
Exactly this.
I suppose you guys have PhD's to back up your critcism of the opinion of another person who is actually a scientist with a PhD?
But again, to be fair, opinion doesn't need any kind of advanced degree. However to argue opinion against opinion, usually a higher level of expertise weights that person's opinion more highly.
I give Kicky's opinion in the matters of law more weight than say, my own, because he is a lawyer and I am not. Doesn't mean he is always right about it, but it still carries more weight.
So you can say what you want, but I take Crichton's opinions regarding science more seriously than a layman's.
Oh and apparently he is not the only one who feels that consensus science is suspect:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719747/
It is indeed hard to disagree with Mr. Crichton. The historical track record of scientific consensus is nothing but dismal. Many examples can be cited, but there are some classical ones. Nicholas Copernicus and his follower, Galileo Galilei, experienced the effects of consensus when they advanced theories that planet Earth was not the center of the Universe. The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were not the right time to go against established dogmas.
Pretty sure that guy has a clue.
https://www.geronet.ucla.edu/research/researchers/349?831a6a7603aca2da33e5c8f97a3f7b84=nelxaznspo
[EDUCATION & CERTIFICATIONS]
PhD in Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires
PhD in Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
But again, I guess it is still my opinion. I fully accept that I may be wrong. But so may you.