What's new
By:

Obama Might Lose This

Stoked said:
To be honest I did not even see Samuel L Jackson on there. But Pulp fiction is a fantastic movie.
Click to expand...

'I voted for Barack because he was black. 'Cuz that’s why other folks vote for other people — because they look like them, that’s American politics, pure and simple. Obama’s message didn’t mean **** to me. In the end, he’s a politician. I just hoped he would do some of what he said he was gonna do. I know politicians say ****; they lie. 'Cuz they want to get elected.' ~ Samuel L. Jackson
Click to expand...

.
 
No need to argue. I went back and edited my original post so that there will be no more confusion.
 
Wisonsin joined Michigan on the toss up list. That has to be concerning for the President.

Obama is still given an edge still in likely electoral votes, 227 - 170. However that is down from 253 - 170.
 
Nate505 said:
The fact it's close means the Republicans have put up an awful candidate. Obama hasn't done much and the economy is stagnant. Think George H.W. Bush. But that year the Dems nominated a candidate worth a damn.

I remember in 04 thinking Bush the 2nd had no chance. I mean, everyone could see what an idiot he was and the he started meaningless wars, who would really vote for him? And the the Dems nominated John Kerry, and the wheels fell off even though it was a race decided by one state.
Click to expand...

Economy is stagnant?

https://www.deseretnews.com/article/765577909/US-home-sales-up-across-the-country-hopeful-sign.html

Americans are buying more homes in every region of the country, the latest indication that the housing market could be on the mend.

An increasing portion of those sales are from first-time buyers, who are critical to a housing recovery.

Sales of previously occupied rose 3.4 percent in April from March to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.62 million, the National Association of Realtors said Tuesday. That nearly matches January's pace of 4.63 million —the best in two years. It is still well below the nearly 6 million that most economists equate with healthy markets.
Click to expand...

I get it I get it, we haven't fully recovered from 09, but to say that the economy is "stagnant" isn't very accurate.
 
Stoked said:
Wisonsin joined Michigan on the toss up list. That has to be concerning for the President.

Obama is still given an edge still in likely electoral votes, 227 - 170. However that is down from 253 - 170.
Click to expand...

If one goes up the other must go down.
Also, I thought there were more electoral votes than that.
The projections I'm looking at still have it at 303-235 for Obama.
 
PearlWatson said:
If one goes up the other must go down.
Also, I thought there were more electoral votes than that.
The projections I'm looking at still have it at 303-235 for Obama.
Click to expand...

I am looking at real clear. It toss not award toss up states to either candidate. That is why I said likely.
 
After 9 pages, I'd like to declare that I'd rather pay for ten rectal scopings performed atop matress springs inside a dirty Russian brothel basement before giving one **** who wins this election. Tomata tomatia, ya know?
 
franklin said:
After 9 pages, I'd like to declare that I'd rather pay for ten rectal scopings performed atop matress springs inside a dirty Russian brothel basement before giving one **** who wins this election. Tomata tomatia, ya know?
Click to expand...

I like rubber gloves, I spose.
 
Last edited:
franklin said:
After 9 pages, I'd like to declare that I'd rather pay for ten rectal scopings performed atop matress springs inside a dirty Russian brothel basement before giving one **** who wins this election. Tomata tomatia, ya know?
Click to expand...

I hope you like the snap of a rubber glove because that's exactly what you're going to get over the next decade.
 
PearlWatson said:
Think again for the first time.
Click to expand...

Let's see, I own a few incandescent light bulbs and it's totally legal to use them. Plus it was a Republican who passed that ban in the first place. I've never seen a law to ban what car a person can drive. There are still a few jackasses who still drive Hummers around here. As for food there is hardly any sort of ban on food.

And even if what you said was true at least it's just a ban. The right prefers to throw people in jail for activities they deem to be immoral.
 
franklin said:
After 9 pages, I'd like to declare that I'd rather pay for ten rectal scopings performed atop matress springs inside a dirty Russian brothel basement before giving one **** who wins this election. Tomata tomatia, ya know?
Click to expand...

Yeah right. You pray every night, like all the other Mormons, that Mitt buys his way into the Whitehouse.
 
Nate505 said:
Let's see, I own a few incandescent light bulbs and it's totally legal to use them. Plus it was a Republican who passed that ban in the first place. I've never seen a law to ban what car a person can drive. There are still a few jackasses who still drive Hummers around here. As for food there is hardly any sort of ban on food.

And even if what you said was true at least it's just a ban. The right prefers to throw people in jail for activities they deem to be immoral.
Click to expand...

That ain't the truth.:

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Pub.L. 110-140[1] originally named the Clean Energy Act of 2007) is an Act of Congress concerning the energy policy of the United States. As part of the Democratic Party's 100-Hour Plan during the 110th Congress,[2] it was introduced in the United States House of Representatives by Representative Nick Rahall of West Virginia, along with 198 cosponsors.
Click to expand...

There is a Titanic load of Democratic Party acts and policies that encroach on/restrict my personal freedoms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top