What's new
By:

Official Offseason Rumors Thread

Perhaps you are right. Ironic in that you are actually that obtuse and not just pretending.
 
Thee jazz fan said:
Quite frankly the dumbest post ever on jazzfanz. Idiot!! U realize if not for the injury the Jazz might have had the 5th seed for a team where most of the top guys are still developing? This would make your entire argument very much a waste of time. Exum Lyles Hood and Gobert still basically in their infancy as far as their careers are concerned, and with all the cap space they have, that should scare the hell out of the rest of the league. The Jazz are slowly but surely building the deepest team in the league. A proper rebuild takes a good 5-7-8 years. We will be built to last a long time. I couldn't be more giddy about how this team is starting to shape into.

There is so many possibilities. Exum in my opinion should be a star. Gobert is going to be a defensive star for years to come. If the Jazz do lose or decide we can't keep Hayward, we can flip him for some nice depth and future assets and replace him with Hood, and start Burks. Lyles looks like a high end starting caliber stretch/playmaking 4. If need be we can do some more replenishing of talent and future assets with Favors, and that's before we have all this money to lock up our other players and continue to add depth when needed. We have so many options it's frightening.
Click to expand...

One daay I know you can make it to woman and wont have so much mad and anger. I wish for this and I wish for piece. OK?
 
Ohm Youngmisuk: Dennis Schroder made it no secret that he wants to be a starting point guard in the future. Hawks may have a decision to make on what direction they want to go with Jeff Teague or Schroder. Schroder finished Game 4 while Teague sat entire fourth. Teague could be attractive on trade market with one year left on deal worth $8 million.
 
JAZZ MAKE SECOND PICK I CANT EVN BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!

2. Utah Jazz


Brandon Ingram
Duke
Freshman
Forward


Pelton: Boy, would jumping into the top two make missing the playoffs a lot more tolerable for Jazz fans.

Ingram might immediately have the most potential of any player on Utah's deep roster, and I love the idea of playing him at both forward spots. The Jazz occasionally finished games with Rudy Gobert on the bench, and Ingram could slide to power forward next to Derrick Favors in those lineups.

EDITOR'S PICKS

NBA draft 2016: Complete coverage
From prospect projections to the lottery and draft night, ESPN.com has complete coverage of the 2016 NBA draft.
Ford: The Jazz would suddenly challenge the Wolves for the best young roster in the NBA. And don't forget that Dante Exum is coming back, too. What a fun team this would be to watch.
 
Lottery is a week from tomorrow. Are you guys ready for the Jazz to win it? Where is that thread that proclaims our winnership? [MENTION=1988]Stoked[/MENTION] you gonna sticky it?
 
I look at draft on NBAdraft.net and they have thing showsfuture considers. DL DID NOT! leave us a lot assett like everyone can say. The asset are garbage! Everone!
 
b_line said:
Lottery is a week from tomorrow. Are you guys ready for the Jazz to win it? Where is that thread that proclaims our winnership? [MENTION=1988]Stoked[/MENTION] you gonna sticky it?
Click to expand...

I'll look for it [MENTION=2036]b_line[/MENTION]
 
b_line said:
Lottery is a week from tomorrow. Are you guys ready for the Jazz to win it? Where is that thread that proclaims our winnership? [MENTION=1988]Stoked[/MENTION] you gonna sticky it?
Click to expand...
Churro!!!
 
I know Simmons seems like a transcendant player (and I know I busted certain people's balls about this even being a possibility) but if we got the #1 pick, I'd take Ingram. Shooting is just far too important in today's NBA to take Simmons. I could make some exceptions perhaps but all the other baggage, or what I see as potential baggage, just scares me too much methinks.

Exum-Sign Teague
Hood-Burks
Hayward-Ingram-Ingles
Favors-Lyles
Gobert-Withey-Richard Carter in 2nd round

Deepest team in the league. Run fools into the ground.
 
Last edited:
Cunning Linguist said:
I know Simmons seems like a transcendant player (and I know busted certain people's balls about this even being a possibility) but if we got the #1 pick, I'd take Ingram. Shooting is just far too important in today's NBA to take Simmons. I could make some exceptions perhaps but all the other baggage, or what i see as potential baggage, just scares me too much methinks.

Exum-Sign Teague
Hood-Burks
Hayward-Ingram-Ingles
Favors-Lyles
Gobert-Withey-Richard Carter in 2nd round

Deepest team in the league. Run fools into the ground.
Click to expand...

If you're set on taking ingram, trade down and get another asset. Boston would probably give a fair amount to trade up from two to one to get a perfect fit for them in simmons.
 
#bern said:
I'd give Bismack Biyimbo a deal.
Click to expand...

Last year, yes. But like Jeremy Lin, he's going to get a raise this offseason. Not sure I want him at the new price. Better to buy low. Even with all the ridiculos money that will be thrown around, somebody will get picked up for a steal.
 
Ellis269 said:
Last year, yes. But like Jeremy Lin, he's going to get a raise this offseason. Not sure I want him at the new price. Better to buy low. Even with all the ridiculos money that will be thrown around, somebody will get picked up for a steal.
Click to expand...

He'll still be a bargain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top