There is a difference between a realist and a Pessimist. You are no realist. IF you were you'd look at the reality of the situation good and bad. Not just bad.
Like them allowing the 3rd fewest PPG in the league.
What I will bring up is the huge number of missed games by core players. Namely Gobert, Favors, Burks and Exum. You cannot be a realist when you ignore reality. Jazz are a .500 team when missing huge amounts of games due to injury.
They are 7-1 over the last 8 and lost last night because it was the back end of a back to back. After an OT win in Dallas. With our two main bench guys gone. The loss sucked but let's not act like it is a deal breaker for this season.
You are no realist. You're a pessimist.
What we really need is another 10 day contract.
Srsly, why will Hayward stay on a team that has him playing with D-Leaguers(heavy minutes for 3 years)?
Pics or it didn't happenI am neither.... I am a nudist.
Lol. Pessimists think that realism is negative. That's why they are called pessimists.No, I'm a realist. I'm trying to present a logical expectation not colored by "homer" glasses. If that is pessimistic, then call me a pessimist. If I were projecting the win totals for GS or SA or Boston, for example, I'd be called an optimist.
Jazz are 26-26 right now. That's .500. And please don't bring up last year's post all-star percentage. That was a different team with different players, especially at PG. ALL teams deal with injuries. To expect Utah not to have any more the rest of the way is probably unrealistic.
Utah is still a team that struggles on offense and has the WORST ATO ratio in the league (tied with Phoenix and Philadelphia). They had a nice home winning streak against primarily sub-.500 teams, picked up a nice road win and then lost to a lottery team, demonstrating that they are also far from having a "shut-down" defense that can close out games.
Thirty games left: 14 Home and 16 away. They've been horrible on the road, so disadvantage #1 right there.
There is a difference between a realist and a Pessimist. You are no realist. IF you were you'd look at the reality of the situation good and bad. Not just bad.
Like them allowing the 3rd fewest PPG in the league.
What I will bring up is the huge number of missed games by core players. Namely Gobert, Favors, Burks and Exum. You cannot be a realist when you ignore reality. Jazz are a .500 team when missing huge amounts of games due to injury.
They are 7-1 over the last 8 and lost last night because it was the back end of a back to back. After an OT win in Dallas. With our two main bench guys gone. The loss sucked but let's not act like it is a deal breaker for this season.
You are no realist. You're a pessimist.
Lol. Pessimists think that realism is negative. That's why they are called pessimists.
If the Jazz do nothing by this trade deadline then they better show up hard this offseason and next season or Hayward is gone. Status quo and he leaves.
And optimists think realism is pessimism if it is anything LESS than their rosy outlook.
Let's revisit this series of posts at the end of the year and see who was closer to the truth.
Disclaimer: a trade for a PG like Teague or another impact player changes my outlook. "Realism" would be adjusted upwards since the team would ostensibly be better.
Keep on being a debby downer and cherry picking stats to support your negative view.
Either way go jazz!
Speaking of cherry-picking, how about that 3rd best PPG defense you cited? Last I heard, teams also play offense, where the Jazz are 5th worst. Stating those two facts together is realism and fairness.
I never said Utah wasn't a very good defensive team, although I've seen them struggle getting stops to finish games (4th quarter against NO was an example) - and that concerns me. But admittedly they have a terrible offense at times, often putting them into holes after horrible quarters.
So yes, go Jazz. I've been a fan for more years than many posters have been alive. And before that, I cheered for the Utah Stars who actually DID bring a championship to Utah (many of you will have to look that up). But honestly, my opinion is that this team is a 7th/8th seed at best.
Except you critiqued them unfairly for their defense. So I provided the other half you were conveniently ignoring.
Also:
https://www.teamrankings.com/nba/stat/offensive-efficiency
Jazz are 12th in offensive efficiency, 18% in shooting %. Hardly terrible.
And to me that is pessimism not realism.
Either way I am not going to continue ruining this thread with this argument. I'll enjoy my tinted glasses and you try to enjoy yours. Cheers
Jazz are 14th in defensive efficiency. OPPG is skewed by our pace as is our PPG.
Guys guys. Nobody who believes in God is a realist.
I hope this is settled.
Yikes! You just brought religion into this?
Let me grab some popcorn, sit back and enjoy the discussion.
It was just a joke.
I know. So was my witty response.
Sun is shining in the Bay Area. It's 70 degrees. Great day to be alive. Jazz are going to win the next 30!
You're living the life - good on ya!!!