The Jazz model of reactionism, shrugging, refusal to give up anything in a deal, and essentially complacency with good but everything short of great veteran talent won't put you into contention. Ever.
The best moves the Jazz have made in the last decade revolve around the fireworks of getting Deron and trading him. The Jazz need to show nuts like that more often (and follow through when they get young talent). I'm trying to be patient, but after two years of crickets I'm losing my mind assuming that the trend continues.
Well, before Deron, Jazz had two pretty good talents they tried to build around named Stockton and Malone. You may have heard of them. Perhaps it was a mistake not to trade them before they started to decline. But it would have been a PR nightmare to do so. Did Boston trade Bird, did LA trade Magic? Nope, and those storied franchises went into steep decline right after letting their stars retire.
But the Jazz quickly rebuilt. They went after a couple of restricted FA's whose offers were matched. Then they went after Boozer and Okur, huge risks because KOC overpaid to get them to sign with the Jazz. KOC traded up to get Deron. The team went to the WC finals and were so close to being legit contenders: had Boozer just played a little defense, had AK not gone all EMO.
It takes a while to rebuild, to get rid of contracts. The Sloan/Deron fiasco caught everyone off guard. The team was trying to keep Deron and rebuild around him, evidenced by the trade for a top big in AL. That was a risk. And he and Deron never meshed well. Then Deron sours on Sloan, stops running his plays and Jerry quits. KOC and Greg have a powwow and decide Deron is a BIG part of the problem and very likely will not re-sign with the Jazz. Should KOC have gone the Denver route, trading for more established players? Debatable. KOC swung for the fences, banking on Favors becoming an all-star caliber big and the future picks turning into quality players as well.
Houston paying Harden a ton of money is like the chance we took throwing MAX money at AK. Is Harden a superstar? Can he carry the team like a Kobe or LeBron? Guess only time will tell. And what if they can get Howard? Will the big three of Harden, Howard, Lin be enough? There are only two teams that have succeeded with the model of acquiring a big 3 and roster fillers: Boston and Miami. In Boston's case, they were lucky to have had a young Rondo. In Miami's case, LeBron and Wade are truly transcendent talents.
SA is an outlier. They tanked into Duncan. But they have, IMO, the best coach in Popovich (I'd rank him ahead of even Jackson, were Phil still coaching). And their talent evaluation has been brilliant. OK, KOC is not on that level. But no one else is, either.
Jazz are rebuilding a 2nd time. But we're still competitive. That's a tremendous feat. Sure I'd like Utah to contend for a championship THIS season. I want that every year. But I also look at what the Jazz are trying to do with cap space. They'll be in a tremendous place this summer with Jefferson and Millsap off the roster. They should still be in good shape in 2 years when Marvin comes off the books...just in time to re-sign Favors and Hayward. Tell you what, I like our position a lot better than Brooklyn's. They've failed with their Big-3 strategy...and they know it.
OK, so let's go the OKC route. Dump all our players so we finish in the high lottery 3 straight years. Perhaps we'll get lucky enough that in one of those years a Durant comes our way.
Patience, grasshopper.