What's new

Pels at Jazz: The Hot Streak Continues

It's not offending me you imbecile. I already explained the reasons, and they had nothing to do with offense. Incapable of rational discourse?
If a game girl was seen on your work computer, you wouldn't get in trouble with HR over our PG game girl pictures; you would get in trouble for being on a fan forum during work hours.

There are more graphic photos and ads on Facebook, but it is socially acceptable to scroll Facebook on work computers.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
If a game girl was seen on your work computer, you wouldn't get in trouble with HR over our PG game girl pictures; you would get in trouble for being on a fan forum during work hours.

There are more graphic photos and ads on Facebook, but it is socially acceptable to scroll Facebook on work computers.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app

Hahaha fair point, being at work on a fan forum and he's worried that someone would just see the picture. I didn't think of that, good point lol
 
If a game girl was seen on your work computer, you wouldn't get in trouble with HR over our PG game girl pictures; you would get in trouble for being on a fan forum during work hours.

There are more graphic photos and ads on Facebook, but it is socially acceptable to scroll Facebook on work computers.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app

Ah, no I wouldn't. I'm not in prison. I can browse the internet at work. It's no issue. But having sexually suggestive images makes me cautious every time I have to visit the site. Which is often. I rarely use Facebook, and I don't know how it works. But it had images that are more graphic, then it is absolutely, unquestionably, unacceptable. Anyone who works at a largish company knows this.
 
Ah, no I wouldn't. I'm not in prison. I can browse the internet at work. It's no issue. But having sexually suggestive images makes me cautious every time I have to visit the site. Which is often. I rarely use Facebook, and I don't know how it works. But it had images that are more graphic, then it is absolutely, unquestionably, unacceptable. Anyone who works at a largish company knows this.
This sexually suggestive girl was the game girl for the Bucks game.

C'mon man. Live a little. tapatalk_1551738413311.jpeg

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
This sexually suggestive girl was the game girl for the Bucks game.

C'mon man. Live a little. View attachment 6873

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app

/facepalm

It has nothing to do with living a little. I don't care about the sexual content. I can go to Pornhub after I get home. What I said was, companies give sexual harassment training that covers these things. This is not just me. Others in this thread agree. I am asking for courtesy. Not trying to take away your rights.
 
If a game girl was seen on your work computer, you wouldn't get in trouble with HR over our PG game girl pictures; you would get in trouble for being on a fan forum during work hours.

There are more graphic photos and ads on Facebook, but it is socially acceptable to scroll Facebook on work computers.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app

If someone files an HR complaint based on those pictures you would. Which is what he said.

Agree with the argument or don’t. Whatever. But why are people failing to understand his argument?
 
/facepalm

It has nothing to do with living a little. I don't care about the sexual content. I can go to Pornhub after I get home. What I said was, companies give sexual harassment training that covers these things. This is not just me. Others in this thread agree. I am asking for courtesy. Not trying to take away your rights.
How about a compromise - we only post Jazz dancers since they are employees of the organization. Does that make it better?

east-vs-west-nba-cheerleaders-edition-81.jpeg

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Back
Top