What's new
By:

Please Be The Rise Of A Third Party

Why does everyone need a bogey man? I was on the road in the middle of nowhere a lot lately and listening to the only thing on the radio: Rush Limbaugh. The guy goes on a rant about how liberals always need someone to blame so they vote populist notions to punish the big, bad rich guy.

He is right.

Then he goes on and on about how the establishment is such a problem. Washington D.C. blah blah blah.

Again, he was right. He just didn't realize how hypocritically right he was in indicting himself to his own character issues. He needs someone to blame.


I see the same thing every time I hear one of these whiny gripes about our two party system. Don't like it? VOTE! Lean republican? Go register for the democratic party and moderate it. Flaming lib? Go become a republican and start influencing the conventions. It really isn't that hard to make changes if people get over their party affiliations and vote opposite. You don't need a bogey man monster. Grow your asses up and start thinking like an adult instead of a bunch of whiny *** kids who need someone to blame for some alleged problem that probably isn't real to begin with. The D's and the R's aren't the problem.
 
franklin said:
Why does everyone need a bogey man? I was on the road in the middle of nowhere a lot lately and listening to the only thing on the radio: Rush Limbaugh. The guy goes on a rant about how liberals always need someone to blame so they vote populist notions to punish the big, bad rich guy.

He is right.

Then he goes on and on about how the establishment is such a problem. Washington D.C. blah blah blah.

Again, he was right. He just didn't realize how hypocritically right he was in indicting himself to his own character issues. He needs someone to blame.


I see the same thing every time I hear one of these whiny gripes about our two party system. Don't like it? VOTE! Lean republican? Go register for the democratic party and moderate it. Flaming lib? Go become a republican and start influencing the conventions. It really isn't that hard to make changes if people get over their party affiliations and vote opposite. You don't need a bogey man monster. Grow your asses up and start thinking like an adult instead of a bunch of whiny *** kids who need someone to blame for some alleged problem that probably isn't real to begin with. The D's and the R's aren't the problem.
Click to expand...
Idwtp
 
ElRoach0 said:
Same old same old just doesn't cut it. But it works for him, so who gives a ****.
Click to expand...

I would expect this response from someone who's always crying wolf. Sorry the adult in the room told you to grow some balls and stop throwing childish fits. Now run along and let the grown ups talk.
 
Gameface said:
Oh you were asking in the meta sense...
Click to expand...

I'm dumb and don't know what that means either.

Fish,

Did you mean it's good to pass the buck and blame some mother of all problems?
Did you mean Rush Limbaugh is right that liberals suck and he is magically righteous?
Did you mean moderating the parties is a bad thing?
Did you mean creating an environment where democrats and republicans can actually work together is disagreeable?
Did you mean that having a party that could support non-radical candidates would be a bad thing?


My proposal says no to all of those. It's also a pragmatic, sensible solution to everyone who claims the two party system is the problem (it isn't, we are). You want a third party? Guess what, it will be a moderate party. That's the only viable third party in America. You might as well not claim some grand scheme is needed at attempting to fail at creating that party. Why waste your efforts on something that is not going to happen. Just moderate the two we already have, starting with the conservative a.k.a. anarchist faction of the republican party por favor.
 
franklin said:
I'm dumb and don't know what that means either.

Fish,

Did you mean it's good to pass the buck and blame some mother of all problems?
Did you mean Rush Limbaugh is right that liberals suck and he is magically righteous?
Did you mean moderating the parties is a bad thing?
Did you mean creating an environment where democrats and republicans can actually work together is disagreeable?
Did you mean that having a party that could support non-radical candidates would be a bad thing?


My proposal says no to all of those. It's also a pragmatic, sensible solution to everyone who claims the two party system is the problem (it isn't, we are). You want a third party? Guess what, it will be a moderate party. That's the only viable third party in America. You might as well not claim some grand scheme is needed at attempting to fail at creating that party. Why waste your efforts on something that is not going to happen. Just moderate the two we already have, starting with the conservative a.k.a. anarchist faction of the republican party por favor.
Click to expand...

Always say no to the Modstapo. Major changes are needed and if they're viewed as "extreme" or what not than so be it, I don't give a crap. What I find extreme is having been enslaved by the Federal Reserve economic system for so long.
 
Jamezz said:
Always say no to the Modstapo. Major changes are needed and if they're viewed as "extreme" or what not than so be it, I don't give a crap. What I find extreme is having been enslaved by the Federal Reserve economic system for so long.
Click to expand...

Another bogey man that isn't real.
 
what-will-gary-johnson-really-get-with-5-of-the-vote-66396.jpg




#FeelTheJohnson
 
franklin said:
I would expect this response from someone who's always crying wolf. Sorry the adult in the room told you to grow some balls and stop throwing childish fits. Now run along and let the grown ups talk.
Click to expand...

I don't remember there ever being an adult... especially not you.

Prolly still butt hurt about getting trolled off the forum. Says a lot about your character, you know... running away like the bitch you are.
 
JimLes said:
I love how Libertarians are asking for federal funding. Don't you need to at least win some elections before you become a hypocrite?
Click to expand...

It's donated money that people give voluntarily. When you go to the DMV or file your taxes they ask you if you want to donate to the presidential campaign fund. You don't have to pay it. That's where this money comes from.
 
♪alt13 said:
It's donated money that people give voluntarily. When you go to the DMV or file your taxes they ask you if you want to donate to the presidential campaign fund. You don't have to pay it. That's where this money comes from.
Click to expand...

*whispers

"He lives in Canada..."
 
ElRoach0 said:
I don't remember there ever being an adult... especially not you.

Prolly still butt hurt about getting trolled off the forum. Says a lot about your character, you know... running away like the bitch you are.
Click to expand...

Oh look how cute. It made a post without a lame *** mom joke!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top