What's new

Proof of Fake News from Left leaning Outlets.

See video below


I wonder how the fake news deniers will spin this. Its amazing that this can happen. You cant tell me this was a mistake. This isnt journalism or news. Its straight up propaganda done on purpose. The only other alternative is really poor incompetent and lazy journalism. It doesn't even matter which one though. Both are bad. There should be consequences like losing the right to be a journalist for doing stuff like this.

But no. We will just continue arguing whats real and whats not with fake news deniers even though the proof is right in their faces.

It's a bizarre time we live in.

Womp, womp. Who cares. On to the next story. On to the next fake story. Round and round we go.


https://www.courier-journal.com/sto...-gun-range-video-as-syria-bombing/3976328002/


I saw this one, it was truly a deplorable act. This **** should be taken seriously.
 
More proof of fake news

Yes, the mainstream media does diss the left-wing candidates in the Democratic party infavor of the center-right candidates. Welcome to the party.

Andrew Yang demands apology. And he is right.

Need more proof the establishment Democrats aren't in bed with the Main Stream media.

The mainstream media definitely favors the neoliberals over the progressives. Thank you for your example of the clear centrist bias in the media.
 
Yes, the mainstream media does diss the left-wing candidates in the Democratic party infavor of the center-right candidates. Welcome to the party.



The mainstream media definitely favors the neoliberals over the progressives. Thank you for your example of the clear centrist bias in the media.

What they are protecting is not the interests of centrists and moderates. Its the establishment elites. Its the corporate war machine they are protecting.

I label them as left leaning and smear them. But that is because they have fools who are progressive that support them. Those fools don't understand what they are supporting. So they are connected. I know that they truly don't represent true progressives. Alot of progressives dont even see what is happening. My beef is more to do with idiots letting them get away with this, rather than progressive policies themselves. I actually could get behind paid education and medical if the numbers make sense.

I dont understand how you can admit that they willingly undermine our political system and report fake news , but you dont see it as a probIem. Im trying to be on your side and help you. Im trying to point out what is hurting your cause, but you turn that into something else. You turn it into Im being an ***. But factually Im correct. Its fake news. The president is correct. Its fake news. You cant spin this as anything else. They are manipulating the truth to benefit the people paying them. Its not real news. Its a sham. This is not good, and not ok. Its not ok that Andrew Yang and Bernie Sanders are what the left really wants but they are getting screwed. Im not ok with that. Its weird that I care more than the people its hurting.

Trump is the only man willing to stand up to it. Thats why I support him. Surely it has to make sense on some level that if he is opposed to them, and they lie about all sorts of things, then what they say about him has to be lies on some level. Or at least blown out of proportion. He is hurting them. They dont like it. They are retaliating and convincing the people to do it too. Fortunately a lot of people aren't falling for it. Unfortunately, there are many who are falling for it.
 
Last edited:
What they are protecting is not the interests of centrists and moderates. Its the establishment elites. Its the corporate war machine they are protecting.

Since it is the centrists and moderates that protect the establishment elite and the corporate war machine, it amounts to the same thing.

I label them as left leaning and smear them. But that is because they have fools who are progressive that support them. Those fools don't understand what they are supporting.

Your lying about what the media is, and supports, fools few progressives.

I actually could get behind paid education and medical if the numbers make sense.

The numbers do make sense, if you don't worship wealth.

I dont understand how you can admit that they willingly undermine our political system and report fake news , but you dont see it as a probIem.

I don't? If you stop telling the lie that the broadcast media/CNN are biased left, you might be surprised how much agree on the danger of their propagandistic tendencies. I think "fake" is a little too far, but biased is definitely not.

Its fake news. The president is correct.

The stuff Trump complains about is usually not fake.

They are manipulating the truth to benefit the people paying them.

Yes, the media owned by the wealthy tends to protect the wealthy.

Trump is the only man willing to stand up to it.

Please. He drools over Fox News, which is the most corporate-friendly, war-mongering major network of all.
 
Andrew Yang demands apology. And he is right.

Need more proof the establishment Democrats aren't in bed with the Main Stream media.

No? Maybe the next 60 examples will convince you.

https://www.newsweek.com/andrew-yan...ng-2020-campaign-cnn-mainstream-media-1473769

I have not actually followed very closely the Democratic race for the nomination. As yet, or at least not as much as some here. And I am not at all familiar with Yang. I found the article very revealing, frankly. And I do get it, in the sense that we can expect this. I think in the case of Morning Joe, that Scarborough believes Biden has the best chance to beat Trump.

Sounds like Yang has a case, very much so really. It's not fair, and we all know life is not fair at times. He should not be treated as an afterthought, or lobbed dumb questions. I don't like it. At the same time, I am in the camp whose priority is a candidate with the best chance of beating Trump. I have no real idea who that is at the moment. It won't be easy unseating Donald Trump.

We may disagree on how we define "fake news", though. For myself, fake news is simply untruths presented as fact. Like the "biggest inauguration crowd in history", or "Ukraine, not Russia, interfered in the 2016 election". The Yang thing seems more like an inexcusable bias.
 
I have not actually followed very closely the Democratic race for the nomination. As yet, or at least not as much as some here. And I am not at all familiar with Yang. I found the article very revealing, frankly. And I do get it, in the sense that we can expect this. I think in the case of Morning Joe, that Scarborough believes Biden has the best chance to beat Trump.

Sounds like Yang has a case, very much so really. It's not fair, and we all know life is not fair at times. He should not be treated as an afterthought, or lobbed dumb questions. I don't like it. At the same time, I am in the camp whose priority is a candidate with the best chance of beating Trump. I have no real idea who that is at the moment. It won't be easy unseating Donald Trump.

We may disagree on how we define "fake news", though. For myself, fake news is simply untruths presented as fact. Like the "biggest inauguration crowd in history", or "Ukraine, not Russia, interfered in the 2016 election". The Yang thing seems more like an inexcusable bias.
I’m glad that you acknowledge the bias shown for certain candidates. Bias towards the more interventionist candidates in my view.
 
Are you trying to say Trump is the first and only president that has lied before?

At least Trump is lying every minute like all the fake past presidents who hide their real identities and motives.
No, definitely not, but he is the President who has lied the most.
 
Back
Top