What's new

Purple & Blues - Utah Jazz Continue to Struggle Against Good Teams

Utah Jazz Newsfeed

Active Member
With just a 6-12 record against*teams that currently hold a record above .500, the Utah Jazz have had significant struggles against the NBA’s best so far this season. The Utah Jazz*currently find themselves in fifth place in the Western Conference with a solid 29-17 record. They recently went on an incredible six-game winning streak and […]
Utah Jazz Continue to Struggle Against Good Teams - Purple and Blues - Purple and Blues - A Utah Jazz Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More


Full Story...
 
In. 1st page!!! This stat is an elephant in the room. The Vets don't seem to be enough to cut the mustard vs GOOD TEAMS.
 
If they aimed to keep the team young instead of bring in vets to appease Hayward, how much worse would that stat really be???
 
Lemme triple-post in this bitch. Posters here have been fighting me tooth and nail since the summer about the direction of the team - I want to see someone spin/explain this ****.

George Hill got roasted by Westbrook last night and turns 31 this summer and possibly wants the max... Does this not reek of mediocrity?



75:1 to win the championship!! wooo-hooo!!!!
 
This type of posts is tiring, you read them in every nba forum, but it still is : winning in the NBA is hard, wanting to go for broke all the time to really really really have a real chance to win it all leaves you broke and losing most of the time. It just doesn't work. You build your team progressively, then when the stars align and your core starts to reach maturity, you give it a real try before risking losing important players. That's the situation the Jazz are in, and that's what they do. If it fails and some key players start bolting, than you start a retooling process later on, but the jazz are entering that period where they have to make a play for it.

Keeping a team young has one result and only one result : you lose. You don't win. No young team has ever won. teams that win are either veteran teams or at the very least experienced teams. the 2015 Warriors were not a young puppy team, they were as young as you can possibly be and Curry was in his 6th year, Thompson in his 4th, Green in his 3rd, Bogut, Livingston and Lee 10th and Iguodala 11th...

A young team doesn't win. Period. staying young means keeping not winning. To real try you have to use your core when it enters its prime + surround it with good vets. The jazz are doing this with Hayward, Gobert, Favors, Hood, Burks and surrounding them with Hill, Diaw, Johnson. Now the talent level might not be enough compared to the Warriors, but you won't know without giving it a try. Now let's drop the " stay young and focus on potential" gibberish, that's something losing teams do.
 
That's kinda dumb as an article, Jazz had multiple starters injured nearly every game, so of course they couldn't beat the best teams very often.

When Utah's fully healthy, they win most of the time even vs very good teams. It's just they weren't healthy very often.

They beat OKC, San Antonio, Cleveland, Houston... They hardly could have done more with so many injuries.
 
While I think there's merit to this argument. Last night doesn't tell the whole story. A full strength OKC, with a rested Adams, requires a full strength Jazz last night. We could've used Rodney's shooting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Lemme triple-post in this bitch. Posters here have been fighting me tooth and nail since the summer about the direction of the team - I want to see someone spin/explain this ****.

George Hill got roasted by Westbrook last night and turns 31 this summer and possibly wants the max... Does this not reek of mediocrity?



75:1 to win the championship!! wooo-hooo!!!!

Wait, because Boris, George and Joe are not taking a non play off team and making them GS in one season it's doomed? That's your argument?
 
PG_AB, wanted the Jazz to build around Harrison Barnes, Tobias Harris, and Jrue Holiday. WTF is he doing in this thread.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
 
The Jazz have beat each team ahead of them save the Warriors at least once. Obviously some of the losses were with the Jazz at less than full strength. I'm completely comfortable with the trajectory of the team this season.
 
Lemme triple-post in this bitch. Posters here have been fighting me tooth and nail since the summer about the direction of the team - I want to see someone spin/explain this ****.

George Hill got roasted by Westbrook last night and turns 31 this summer and possibly wants the max... Does this not reek of mediocrity?

Jazz record against winning teams
With Hill: 5-4
Without Hill: 1-8

And PGAB brings up George Hill as one of our problems. Genius.

Concerning that 5-4 record, two of the four losses were without Hayward, the third was our 5th game in 7 nights at Memphis.
 
Last edited:
The George Hill who's missed two weeks and four weeks respectively during the season, then got his face "Halloween'd" shortly after coming back and returned 3 games later. His rhythm must be incredible. If he's losing matchups in mid February I'll start to be concerned(provided he stays healthy)
 
George Hill got roasted by Westbrook last night and turns 31 this summer and possibly wants the max... Does this not reek of mediocrity?

Do you watch the NBA? That probably wasn't in Westbrook's top 15 games THIS season. He goes off EVERY night. Show me one person who can stop Russell other than himself. This is a ridiculous argument.
 
Back
Top