What's new
By:

Question for Mormons

Mormons: Would you only marry if it was to another Mormon?

  • Yes

    Votes: 13 41.9%

  • No

    Votes: 18 58.1%
  • Total voters
    31
PKM said:
I agree NAOS.

Btw, you are allegedly a dumbass bitch that can't take the fact that nobody here pities you for going to hell.

Awesome how that word makes everything a-ok.
Click to expand...

no, I think that particular usage was clearly negative and intended to send a point. In other words, not at all what I did.
 
NAOS said:
no, I think that particular usage was clearly negative and intended to send a point. In other words, not at all what I did.
Click to expand...

Said in jest .. though .. to make a point.

Not sure what it was, cuz I'm just a mental-midget.
 
PKM said:
Said in jest .. though .. to make a point.

Not sure what it was, cuz I'm just a mental-midget.
Click to expand...

Finally, undeniable, irrefutable statement with 100% empirical data to support the truth.
 
dalamon said:
Violently? Dude, I aint Mormon. Id say that that is exaggerating it a bit. Why the hell should I care? God never exists in human form according to the Quran. I was simply trying to point out why some might be offended, and maybe give a tip for future religious discourse.
Click to expand...

then you tell me why you were so set-off by my post.

The interaction was between Spazz and myself, and we worked it out with no hard feelings in less than 3 posts. Why do you, Trout, and PKM have a problem? this is especially interesting since you three claim to be so neutral and differently religious (and, therefore, to have less on the line personally)
 
PKM said:
Said in jest .. though .. to make a point.

Not sure what it was, cuz I'm just a mental-midget.
Click to expand...

so your point was that "allegedly" can be taken in a multitude of ways, right? You were demonstrating its negative usage.

Is it conceivable that it I meant it differently?

Or, you can forget this question and ask yourself and your other cronies, Does it even matter since it transpired between Spazz and NAOS and they seemed to move on pretty quickly?

Did anybody catch the part where I said I prefer Mormon cosmology over some other Christian narratives? Or are we still operating under the assumption that I've been a whitewashing ******* victim, like Trout says. I know we have to listen to what he says.
 
NAOS said:
then you tell me why you were so set-off by my post.

The interaction was between Spazz and myself, and we worked it out with allegedly no hard feelings in less than 3 posts. Why do you, Trout, and PKM have a problem? this is especially interesting since you three claim to be so neutral and differently religious (and, therefore, to have less on the line personally)
Click to expand...

Well if you're reading Spazz's posts literally, then I suppose that this can be determined. Personally, I am gonna call the smallest shred of doubt to the literal interpretation of Spazz's acceptance of zero hard feelings.


;)
 
NAOS said:
then you tell me why you were so set-off by my post.

The interaction was between Spazz and myself, and we worked it out with no hard feelings in less than 3 posts. Why do you, Trout, and PKM have a problem? this is especially interesting since you three claim to be so neutral and differently religious (and, therefore, to have less on the line personally)
Click to expand...

I was SILENT until you complained that no one was addressing YOU. I stated that I did so out of respect .. you pushed and a few obliged.
 
NAOS said:
so your point was that "allegedly" can be taken in a multitude of ways, right? You were demonstrating its negative usage.

Is it conceivable that it I meant it differently?

Or, you can forget this question and ask yourself and your other cronies, Does it even matter since it transpired between Spazz and NAOS and they seemed to move on pretty quickly?

Did anybody catch the part where I said I prefer Mormon cosmology over some other Christian narratives? Or are we still operating under the assumption that I've been a whitewashing ******* victim, like Trout says. I know we have to listen to what he says.
Click to expand...

I already said I thought you meant it light-heartedly .. and even if I'm wrong, no biggie. I don't get mad because people don't subscribe to my belief system.
 
PKM said:
I was SILENT until you complained that no one was addressing YOU. I stated that I did so out of respect .. you pushed and a few obliged.
Click to expand...

this is well beyond ridiculous.

I only said that because you claimed I had been far more derogatory to others beliefs than they had been to mine. I challenged that by asking you to prove it.
 
NAOS said:
The interaction was between Spazz and myself, and we worked it out with no hard feelings in less than 3 posts.
Click to expand...

This.

NAOS said:
Why do you, Trout, and PKM have a problem? this is especially interesting since you three claim to be so neutral and differently religious (and, therefore, to have less on the line personally)
Click to expand...

It looks to me like they're incorrectly assuming you're atheist. Thus, your post must have been a shot at religion rather than the valid discussion point it is after changing assumptions regarding the messenger.

Allegedly from atheist = Christ ain't real you dummy.
Allegedly from theist = we don't know how much of that stuff is real and how much is myth or outright falsified.
 
franklin said:
This.



It looks to me like they're incorrectly assuming you're atheist. Thus, your post must have been a shot at religion rather than the valid discussion point it is after changing assumptions regarding the messenger.

Allegedly from atheist = Christ ain't real you dummy.
Allegedly from theist = we don't know how much of that stuff is real and how much is myth or outright falsified.
Click to expand...

You didn't read enough of the thread, obviously .. as it was no leap, whatsoever, to assume atheist. I never bashed him for that, once .. I jumped on him a couple times for coming off that that, in itself, makes him intellectually superior. Just as I would jump on a Christian for coming off that they are somehow superior simply because of which way they believe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top