What's new
By:

Rank actual Jazz players in this draft !

seattlejazzfan said:
Not sure what tournament (2 games?) you're referring to, but...

Over the course of the U19 - sample size matters - he averaged 18, 4 and 4 on 44% FGs. That is indeed mediocre.
Click to expand...

the Australian Schools Championship - Lake Ginninderra vs. The Scotts College was the gold medal game with the 15 assists

im not sure how many rounds the tournament is, but in 2008 there were 145 teams from 7 different states/territories at the championship; split up into 4 divisions, Mens and Womens, junior and senior... so im going to assume it was a good few games at least
 
PointGod_AlecBurks said:
the Australian Schools Championship - Lake Ginninderra vs. The Scotts College was the gold medal game with the 15 assists

im not sure how many rounds the tournament is, but in 2008 there were 145 teams from 7 different states/territories at the championship; split up into 4 divisions, Mens and Womens, junior and senior... so im going to assume it was a good few games at least
Click to expand...

If you have or can find a link, that would be great. I want to like Exum because all it will take is one shake up in the top 4 and if the Jazz stay at 5, there is a good chances he's the pick. If I can see that he has produced over several games (even if the competition isn't that great), it will help.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
Based on what we know now?

1. Embiid
2. Wiggins
3. Randle
4. Favors
5. Smart
6. Burks
7. Hayward
8. Kanter
9. Saric
10. Gordon
11. Vonleh
12. Parker
13. Burke
14. McDermott
Click to expand...

This might actually be one of the worst things I've ever seen. It's actually impressive.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
If you have or can find a link, that would be great. I want to like Exum because all it will take is one shake up in the top 4 and if the Jazz stay at 5, there is a good chances he's the pick. If I can see that he has produced over several games (even if the competition isn't that great), it will help.
Click to expand...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw4yuJogKCw
 
Many later NCAA II and NAIA stars drop like 25 points in HS games, easily.
Kanter averaged 18 rebs per game in an international tournament, no I am not talking about HS games in Australia.
It was an int'l tournament.
A stat line of 18/4/4 is mediocre.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
Thank goodness. Sometimes after posting something like that you wonder how you did. To see that you disapprove, my confidence is restored.
Click to expand...

I normally don't react like this, but I find you to be annoying.


You need to get this straight, at no point will you ever know more about basketball than I do. The fact that Nickkkk is about the only person who agrees with you on Randle should say enough. I'm not going to say Exum is great, because I haven't seen him enough, but he certainly has the tools to be very good. In addition, 18, 4, and 4 are quality numbers against very good competition. He's one of 3 players in the top 4 who actually have the potential to be above average on both sides of the ball. Your little boy toy Randle can't even play good defense against players that were far below his talent level...so he's certainly not going to be good at it in the NBA.
 
Tarkanian said:
Many later NCAA II and NAIA stars drop like 25 points in HS games, easily.
Kanter averaged 18 rebs per game in an international tournament, no I am not talking about HS games in Australia.
It was an int'l tournament.
A stat line of 18/4/4 is mediocre.
Click to expand...

The talent level is just a little different. Hell, I think Jahlil Okafor averaged like 10 and 4 in that tournament.
 
If Kanter had a chance to play college baketball, it would have been close between him and Embiid for the # 1 pick.
 
Hantlers said:
I normally don't react like this, but I find you to be annoying.


You need to get this straight, at no point will you ever know more about basketball than I do. The fact that Nickkkk is about the only person who agrees with you on Randle should say enough. I'm not going to say Exum is great, because I haven't seen him enough, but he certainly has the tools to be very good. In addition, 18, 4, and 4 are quality numbers against very good competition. He's one of 3 players in the top 4 who actually have the potential to be above average on both sides of the ball. Your little boy toy Randle can't even play good defense against players that were far below his talent level...so he's certainly not going to be good at it in the NBA.
Click to expand...

Handlers, I'm not trying to be funny, rather I say this with complete sincerity...if you find me annoying, it really does reinforce the notion that I'm doing something right. I would be concerned if you respected or agreed with most of my opinions.

But keep posting that gibberish. It really is pretty entertaining.

Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk 2
 
Broncster said:
We will never know but I doubt it. I think he would be on par with Randle draft stock.
Click to expand...
Araujo bullied NCAA and got drafted.
Kanter has skillz to be added to his obvious brute manhandling capabilities.
He would have been a college legend, I believe.
 
Jazz4ever said:
So you rate Kanter and Favors ahead of Gordon, yet guarantee us Gordon will "beast out" in the NBA in another thread. Ok then...
Click to expand...

Bigs vs SF's.

Coordinated bigs don't come around that often, and thus their value is higher.

And no, I don't see Vonleh or Randle in same tier as Favors and Kanter.

Maybe read the other thread? It's about Gordon vs. Vonleh and somehow morphed into Gordon vs MKG, Corey Brewer, Kenneth Faried, and Chris Singleton. A. Gordon is hands down better than those players. Personal opinion is he's better than Vonleh, Smart, Randle, and others in consideration for 5th pick.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top