This is the game Hopper always played.
Reputation Comments, positive and negative
- Thread starter Stickler
- Start date
This is the game Hopper always played.
yeah, but the back pocket doesn't count, it's what it the front pocket that's important
:wink:
(not counting the bananas of course...)
I really doubt a moderator told you "I don't know if I can tell you the outcome." If so he/she was confused. We have a general policy that we don't feel obligated to tell people the results of their reports, but there's no policy saying moderators CAN'T tell people the results.
Anyway, I can tell you after you made the reports a discussion thread was started in the moderator forum. In the end there were 9 posts and 7 different posters in the thread. We discussed the four rep comments you reported. Three of them were from one poster, the fourth was from a different poster. After the discussion, the consensus was to issue an official warning to one of the two posters. (The other poster's comment was not deemed warning-worthy.) That was done within 24 hours after you made your report.
I'm also seriously doubting this statement of yours: "I was told privately that all but one of the mods didn't care about it unless it had a homosexual slur attached." If so, your source is leading you seriously astray. In fact, NONE of the mods said anything along the lines that the comments would have been more warning-worthy if they had had homosexual slurs attached. The ONLY mention of homosexual slurs in the thread was that one of the moderators said the infraction given to Sloanfeld for a "wishing for someone to die" rep comment had undoubtedly been in part because of the word "homo", but that he (the moderator) would have voted for an infraction regardless.
I will start a thread in the moderator forum about these new rep comments.
This should turn interesting really quickly.
The only unsigned rep on my list was from Archie, but it wasn't undeserved. Just a post that I meant as sarcastic nonsense which I think he interpreted as plain stupidity. He's given me his fair share of pos-rep, too, so we're all good.
And Viny, you ARE an idiot. - bordy
The only unsigned rep on my list was from Archie, but it wasn't undeserved. Just a post that I meant as sarcastic nonsense which I think he interpreted as plain stupidity. He's given me his fair share of pos-rep, too, so we're all good.
And Viny, you ARE an idiot. - bordy
Oh, and I got an unsigned positive rep from jazzgal....awww *blushes*
Almost makes me want to forgive you for giving out the password to Harpring Sucks Chat to dingleweed himself.
Almost makes me want to forgive you for giving out the password to Harpring Sucks Chat to dingleweed himself.
Thanks.
Why did you neg-rep yourself?
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
Hey my stalker was Sloanfeld and Franklin. Not bad since I neg them both on occasion anyway.
Major oof.
No one else can do it correctly.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
The box guy is gonna get it, along with dutch, kicky, and sloanfeld.
That's a nice spin, but I didn't say you were Hopper, or that I believed you were Hopper. I merely drew a comparison.
OK, so that was talking about Sloanfeld's situation, not about our discussion on your reported rep comments. We didn't have a discussion at the time about what parts of his statement were more offensive then others, so that moderator was just offering his/her opinion about the discussion that had taken place.
Millsapa said:
Well, the policy is that moderators don't HAVE to tell users the outcome, not that they CAN'T. Although, I will admit, there may well be times when we decide that it not really anyone's business but the person who got the infraction.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Dale and Verlin were BOX and Vinylone. Fail.
*Updating favorite poster thread.
*Updating favorite poster thread.
