What's new
By:

Reputation Comments, positive and negative

"Too bad the real moderators won't remove all your posts...."

No good deed goes unpunished.


I don't care if they're anonymous. What I hate is these pansy *** reps with no teeth. If you want to **** on me then put some ****ing testosterone and muscle behind it.

Neg rep worthy of pos rep if it wasn't anonymous: "Submit to me mother ****er"
Yours simply sucks ****.
 
franklin said:
"Too bad the real moderators won't remove all your posts...."

No good deed goes unpunished.


I don't care if they're anonymous. What I hate is these pansy *** reps with no teeth. If you want to **** on me then put some ****ing testosterone and muscle behind it.

Neg rep worthy of pos rep if it wasn't anonymous: "Submit to me mother ****er"
Yours simply sucks ****.
Click to expand...

Only one person I can think of that uses "submit" with great regularity...
 
I am taking a beating for this post. The general consensus is that I am "wrong" and "stupid." This is one of those cases where I wish the neg-reppers would elaborate a little bit. I have a hard time seeing what's wrong or stupid about it. Fact: The behavior of human beings cannot be predicted with complete accuracy. Fact: We see three different antagonists in the video. Neg-reppers: Care to explain where you're coming from?

Stickler said:
Yes, that's what people generally say about bullies. And it's often true. However, bullies are people, with emotions and thoughts and fears and hopes, just like anybody else. They are not automatons who will automatically react in a guaranteed predictable fashion. The little guy on his own probably wouldn't go after "the Hero" again, as he probably now realizes how stupid it was to screw with a guy twice his weight and a head taller than he is...

But there are at least three guys in the group that has been tormenting our hero. We know this because there's a guy filming it and egging the little guy on, and the taller guy who stepped to our hero after he body-slammed the little guy as if to defend him. This introduces a social dynamic into the bullying that your binary yes/no check-box understanding of bullies doesn't account for.

And, of course, even without the social dynamic you'd probably be wrong more often than you're right. But I'm sure you're quite used to that.
Click to expand...
 
Stickler said:
I am taking a beating for this post. The general consensus is that I am "wrong" and "stupid." This is one of those cases where I wish the neg-reppers would elaborate a little bit. I have a hard time seeing what's wrong or stupid about it. Fact: The behavior of human beings cannot be predicted with complete accuracy. Fact: We see three different antagonists in the video. Neg-reppers: Care to explain where you're coming from?
Click to expand...

I personally liked your viewpoint. I didn't rep but maybe I should. I think maybe one part that set folks off was the last line:

And, of course, even without the social dynamic you'd probably be wrong more often than you're right. But I'm sure you're quite used to that.
Click to expand...
 
LogGrad98 said:
I personally liked your viewpoint. I didn't rep but maybe I should. I think maybe one part that set folks off was the last line:
Click to expand...

Keep in mind I was talking to DutchJazz, who in typical DutchJazz fashion is in the thread calling people idiots and commenting on how much everybody else fails, etc. Still, point taken. I can rise above that. :)
 
Stickler said:
Keep in mind I was talking to DutchJazz, who in typical DutchJazz fashion is in the thread calling people idiots and commenting on how much everybody else fails, etc. Still, point taken. I can rise above that. :)
Click to expand...

-8 for 'rising above'. Grow some sack, Sally.
 
Stickler said:
I am taking a beating for this post. The general consensus is that I am "wrong" and "stupid." This is one of those cases where I wish the neg-reppers would elaborate a little bit. I have a hard time seeing what's wrong or stupid about it. Fact: The behavior of human beings cannot be predicted with complete accuracy. Fact: We see three different antagonists in the video. Neg-reppers: Care to explain where you're coming from?
Click to expand...

Stickler said:
Keep in mind I was talking to DutchJazz, who in typical DutchJazz fashion is in the thread calling people idiots and commenting on how much everybody else fails, etc. Still, point taken. I can rise above that. :)
Click to expand...

TroutBum said:
-8 for 'rising above'. Grow some sack, Sally.
Click to expand...

+6 for saying you are "taking a beating for this post", when talking about a post on bullies. I don't care who you are, thats funny stuff right there.
 
Probably the most bizarre rep I've ever received...

Thread: Who do you have on your boycott list
utter waste being a do-gooder tree planter, I agree. But if you just don't chop out those "weed" trees like elms you're gonna have a forest in your yard.
Click to expand...

LOL unsigned of course.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Repped.
Click to expand...

This neg was given on the above quopte. Apparenlty I have a verlin. I am sure that means devastatingly handsome with superior intelligence and other significant "endowments".

Seriously, just shut the hell up. Btw I know your verlin.
Click to expand...
 
I too just got hit by a verlin.

Guys? Verlin? Dale? Have the guts to sign your real name. Fake name shenanigans are the weakest of all Jazzfanz activities.

Better to leave a rep unsigned than to sign it with some dumb fake moniker.
Thanks.
 
Verlin is a commune in the Yonne department in Burgundy in north-central France.
Click to expand...

wikipedia



So that means we been verlined by a nun! It isn't what I remember it being like as an altar boy.
 
Verlin reminds me of this:

jim+varney.jpg


Only less intelligent...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top