And that wouldn't be all that bad. We can call teams and say take your choice: Watson, Tinsley or Foye. Likely that a trade would be to an Eastern Conference playoff team and perhaps net us a late 1st.
Doubt it. They don't want any salary back for next year, which is why they signed him to the 1 year deal. Trading him would probably mean adding a multi-year contract to the team. I think they are keeping Foye for the entire year.
And that wouldn't be all that bad. We can call teams and say take your choice: Watson, Tinsley or Foye. Likely that a trade would be to an Eastern Conference playoff team and perhaps net us a late 1st.So true. Foye sounds like a mid-season trade to me, if Cyrone's info about the rule to forbid trading FA's is not blocking it's way.
I am excited to see the bigs get to work now that at any given time some combo of Hayward, Marvin Williams, Mo Williams and Foye will be stretching the floor. I want to watch Favors and Kanter get busy.
Edit: On a scale of 1-10 (10 being excellent) how do y'all feel the Jazz have addressed 3 pt shooting and stretching the floor? On defense?
9. It will be interesting to see if the Jazz actually break the top 20 in attempts this year.
I was thinking something similar. Jazz have the floor stretching tools now. Question is do the actually use them adequately?
It's a cheap salary. A contending team that needs a good backup guard could give us back an expiring for the 13th/14th player on their team + a draft pick. Or best case, Foye has a decent year, has enjoyed playing with Mo in LA and now Utah, likes the other guys on the team and is the replacement for Watson and Tinsley next season.Doubt it. They don't want any salary back for next year, which is why they signed him to the 1 year deal. Trading him would probably mean adding a multi-year contract to the team. I think they are keeping Foye for the entire year.
I was thinking something similar. Jazz have the floor stretching tools now. Question is do the actually use them adequately?
I'm sure we will still be a paint dominated team, but I will be happy if we are around 20th in attempts. I will be really surprised if we crack the top 15.
Mo Williams, Marvin Williams, and Randy Foye combined made more 3-pointers than the entire Jazz team last year.
You realize Mo Williams played a lot of 2 last year, and the year we made it to the WCF our starting 2 was Derek Fisher? Foye is 6'4, that's on the lower end of starting 2's, but I wouldn't ever hesitate to play him at the 2.
IMO this guy is our backup point. He can bring the ball up the court, can shoot, is a good man defender. He'll initiate the offense and lurk on the perimeter.
This is Hollingers analysis on Foye:
+ Combo guard who can hit mid-range Js. Struggles running offense from point.
+ A natural 2 offensively, but can't defend 2s in post because of lack of height.
+ Draws a lot of fouls for a jump shooter. Excellent foul shooter. Poor rebounder.
Foye had a fairly pedestrian season overall, but one piece of encouragement is that he played much better as a starter in the second half of the season. Foye averaged 17.1 points in February and in 24 games as a starter averaged 18.0 points per 40 minutes, with better percentages to boot. Unfortunately, the starting shooting guard spot with the Clippers is fairly securely in the hands of Eric Gordon, so Foye needs to play well off the bench too. He was abysmal in that role last season, shooting 29.9 percent on 3s and 35.1 percent overall.
For the season as a whole, Foye's numbers were down largely because of a dip in shooting percentage. One suspects that will recover, but his reliance on the mid-range game remains a concern. He shot 39.5 percent on long 2s, which is solid, but combined with his humdrum 3-point shooting (32.7 percent last season, 36.0 percent career), it's a wobbly foundation for his offensive game.
For Foye, the trick is getting to the rim and drawing more fouls. He drew them at a fairly high rate in 2010-11 despite all the jumpers and is the most underrated foul shooter in basketball (he's made 89 percent each of the past two seasons). Indulging that part of the game more would offer big rewards if he can pull it off.
Nonetheless, he's somewhat a man without a position. At 6-foot-3, Foye was absolutely murdered on post-ups by bigger shooting guards, and he's a fish out of water playing the point. Eric Bledsoe's development could potentially help -- he's big enough that he and Foye can switch roles on defense -- but Foye's limitations make it harder to find him productive minutes.
does that mean I'm both crazy and astute as a fan?Randy really played well toward the end of the season last year. If he plays like that for us i dont care if he starts over burks or gordon. Those posters who believe gordon is a franchise player are crazy. Gordon has yet to play a full season of good basketball. Those that feel favors could be a franchise player if he keeps developing are astute bball fans.