The thing is revenue sharing. Philly is the 3rd/4th/5th biggest market in the league and contributes NOTHING. They sport a team that couldn't win a BO5 vs a EuroLeague quarterfinalist and would prolly lose 3/10 games vs EuroCup final round teams.
Philly's games are so distastefully bad that it also causes other teams to charge less for the Philly games because no one cares to watch them.
If you're this openly tanking that hurts the league's revenue and that's why Cuban is pissed. I mean there's other tanking candidates. But you know they build culture and preserve illusion that's good for both the system and the game itself. Other tanking campaigns had the goal to be bad. This one's goal is to be THE WORST. That's the problem.
I can guarantee when it comes time for Dallas to rebuild, Cuban will do whatever he has to, to get his team back on top as soon as possible. As for your statements about Philly, ticket sales in opponents arenas are really no different than any other really bad team. I'd be interested in hearing exactly which moves they've made that are so much worse than any other tanking team. Where, exactly, is this line between acceptable tanking, and unacceptable tanking? It sounds like you believe tanking is ok, just as long as you don't do a good job at it.
Cy;937724g said:
No, kind of like how their team is laughably devoid of talent outside of 3 players. Hard to develop those 3 pieces when you can't even play NBA level basketball. The Warriors tanked, especially at the end, but never like this.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I took your post as a comment on tanking, not personnel. If I'm wrong, then you must be fine with their rebuild, had they only acquired different players. Is this the case? If not, I gotta say that the comments about GS were basically the same. Shameful way to build a team, won't work, losing culture will take hold, etc.
-
Also, as far as Utah being smarter, overall that is probably true. However, if you're talking about how our rebuild started, Utah could have been smarter. Our rebuild should have begun the minute Deron was traded. Timing is everything in a rebuild, and hesitating to accept the situation can burn you, which IMO, is exactly what happened to Utah. Trading Deron when they did was brilliant, but the failure to follow up by dumping Al or Sap for pick/s was a mistake that has set this rebuild back, IMO.
-
How about GS. Would you consider their FO to be smart?