What's new
By:

RIP Robin Williams

  • Thread starter Thread starter JAZZGASM
  • Start date Start date
Hantlers said:
By implying that I wanted something from somebody? By implying that giving means giving some type of possession (money, clothes, etc).

Heck, give a smile, give a kind word. It makes a difference. It's helped me on my bad days when some stranger randomly just gives you a big smile. But I suppose that was selfish of them to do so.
Click to expand...

No, you implied that these people owed us their continued existence so they could further serve the society we belong to.
 
addictionary said:
You are one of the nicest indeed fish.
Click to expand...
Thanks bro. You are one of my favorites.

Can't wait till you team plays in the tourney.

Don't you have magic, niqu', and dr J?
 
Hantlers said:
By implying that I wanted something from somebody? By implying that giving means giving some type of possession (money, clothes, etc).

Heck, give a smile, give a kind word. It makes a difference. It's helped me on my bad days when some stranger randomly just gives you a big smile. But I suppose that was selfish of them to do so.
Click to expand...
LoL .. this is just too rich coming from you. I've been on this board for nearly four years and not once have I heard a kind word from you. In fact the exact opposite is true.
 
The guy killed himself and ruined the lives of those that loved him, yet everyone is giving him a break due to mental illness that he has no control over. Tell me then; is the same consideration given to the mentally sick man who gets his rocks off by molesting kids? It's easy to say that the molester should just ignore his impulses, right?

Double standard?

Not picking sides here, because I see both sides and respect people from both sides of the argument. I'm only putting in my two cents.
 
.......................... and here comes our stupid cow, pulling the heavy troll plow.

E.J. Wells said:
The guy killed himself and ruined the lives of those that loved him, yet everyone is giving him a break due to mental illness that he has no control over. Tell me then; is the same consideration given to the mentally sick man who gets his rocks off by molesting kids? It's easy to say that the molester should just ignore his impulses, right?

Double standard?

Not picking sides here, because I see both sides and respect people from both sides of the argument. I'm only putting in my two cents.
Click to expand...
 
There's not much on Earth that we can call our own. When I think about what's mine, truly mine, I cross almost everything off the list. I can't cross my life off, though, because if that's not mine, then nothing is.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];889566 said:
.......................... and here comes our stupid cow, pulling the heavy troll plow.
Click to expand...

Awesome response. Care to answer my question?
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];889576 said:
When someone says "There's no such thing as a dumb question," that doesn't mean "All questions are equally good."

But, yeah, **** that person. You're asking a stupid *** question.
Click to expand...

So someone who kills someone else due to mental illness is a vile human being that deserves a prison sentence, but someone who kills themselves due to mental illness is deserving of our sympathies and empathy.

You can't look at a rapist and say that he couldn't help it, his brain chemicals were jacked up and try as he may have, he finally succumbed to his temptations. So why are we fine to say that suicide victims couldn't help it, and that the chemical imbalance was to blame?

I know, I know, I haven't brought up Nazi Germany yet, but keep avoiding the question and I'm sure it will pop up.
 
E.J. Wells said:
So someone who kills someone else due to mental illness is a vile human being that deserves a prison sentence, but someone who kills themselves due to mental illness is deserving of our sympathies and empathy.

You can't look at a rapist and say that he couldn't help it, his brain chemicals were jacked up and try as he may have, he finally succumbed to his temptations. So why are we fine to say that suicide victims couldn't help it, and that the chemical imbalance was to blame?

I know, I know, I haven't brought up Nazi Germany yet, but keep avoiding the question and I'm sure it will pop up.
Click to expand...

From now on, I'll just refer to you as a troll in Personal Messages. That way you'll be able to reek havoc out here without my interjection.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];889580 said:
From now on, I'll just refer to you as a troll in Personal Messages. That way you'll be able to reek havoc out here without my interjection.
Click to expand...

It must suck to know that I have you trumped in virtually all aspects of awesome. You may leave this thread now, *** cheeks.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];889567 said:
There's not much on Earth that we can call our own. When I think about what's mine, truly mine, I cross almost everything off the list. I can't cross my life off, though, because if that's not mine, then nothing is.
Click to expand...

If we don't own our own existence we own nothing.
 
E.J. Wells said:
The guy killed himself and ruined the lives of those that loved him, yet everyone is giving him a break due to mental illness that he has no control over. Tell me then; is the same consideration given to the mentally sick man who gets his rocks off by molesting kids? It's easy to say that the molester should just ignore his impulses, right?

Double standard?

Not picking sides here, because I see both sides and respect people from both sides of the argument. I'm only putting in my two cents.
Click to expand...


The person who molests children initiates force against them. That person denies that child ownership over their own body/self. The standard, in my mind, is very clear.
 
Gameface said:
If we don't own our own existence we own nothing.
Click to expand...

Philosophically, this would be a lot more problematic. What defines our control over anything, including our existences? What if we are the bits of a very larger scale intellectual being with much less conscience of existence and actually living a very short amount of time?
 
Gameface said:
The person who molests children initiates force against them. That person denies that child ownership over their own body/self. The standard, in my mind, is very clear.
Click to expand...

Two totally different crimes, I'm not debating that. I'm debating the remorse we feel for one mentally ill person verses the vitriol that is spewed at another.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top