What's new

Roe v Wade Obvious Consequences

Ya I see dumbasses use terms like "pro abortion" (no one is pro abortion) and I saw someone on Facebook talking about all the women getting "casual abortions". There is no such thing as a casual abortion.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
"nobody is pro-abortion"
The restriction in Ohio are after 22 weeks and minors need parents approval

If a fetus was born at 22 weeks it would still have a 30% chance of survival


View: https://twitter.com/abortionfundOH/status/1842176645580423266
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF

View: https://x.com/ppollingnumbers/status/1853925813906821420?s=46


It’s good to keep in mind how fringe some posters here on this website are. They’re in the small minority here in this country. We are in the majority.

Duh- it is legal in Georgia and guess what? Those Georgia voters will get to decide if there are restrictions in Georgia.
Most countries outside of the US do have restrictions on abortion to some extent. Are you in the camp that thinks there should be no restrictions on abortion? If so, that would make you one of those “fringe minorities” you are pointing the finger at.
Outside of fringe idiots this probably has little bearing on the election results in Georgia. It should be legal, safe, and rare like the pedo bill Clinton said
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
I'm honestly worried about even trying to get my wife her citizenship, I don't know if it's a good idea to remind them she exists.
Yeah I don’t know what to tell you. Fascism sucks.

This is why liberals have been warning the country for years that throwing law and procedure out the window for the whims of an aspiring autocrat was a bad idea. We were ignored because egg prices and Harris wasn’t our most perfect ever leader in the history of mankind. You wouldn’t be faced with this problem had Harris won and we had a Democratic congress. I’m sorry, hopefully we see some accountability for electing fascists. Sadly, they own the media and don’t have to honor election results anymore. Fascism sucks
 
Where’s the pro life party now?

Republicans seem fine aborting children as long as they’re brown or black.


View: https://bsky.app/profile/kyledcheney.bsky.social/post/3lnogwyfqs72w


View: https://bsky.app/profile/timmiller.bsky.social/post/3lnatlnx35223


Elections have consequences. Those who didn’t vote for Harris, did this to these people.
 
Where’s the pro life party now?

Republicans seem fine aborting children as long as they’re brown or black.


View: https://bsky.app/profile/kyledcheney.bsky.social/post/3lnogwyfqs72w


View: https://bsky.app/profile/timmiller.bsky.social/post/3lnatlnx35223


Elections have consequences. Those who didn’t vote for Harris, did this to these people.

In light of this thread, it has been obvious for literal decades that the pro-life movement cares only about unborn fetuses and not living human beings. They are just fine with substandard and straight up cruel treatment of actual living human beings as long as it forces more women to produce said living human beings so they can be cruel to them too.
 
I'll never understand why abortion wasn't codified into federal law in the decades since Roe v. Wade
Because pro choice candidates never had a filibuster proof majority to codify it.

Guys, there’s no grand conspiracy here. Democrats weren’t fundraising off of it (republicans certainly have). It’s just never been an animating feature on the left, just like Supreme Court justices have never been a priority of the left either. There’s just not the same money or infrastructure on the left to have codified it.

Sometimes, the votes just aren’t there.

Besides, as Sardines said, Roe v Wade was pretty well established and even now many suffer a failure of imagination on how republicans can and will limit women’s freedom.
 
Last edited:
In light of this thread, it has been obvious for literal decades that the pro-life movement cares only about unborn fetuses and not living human beings. They are just fine with substandard and straight up cruel treatment of actual living human beings as long as it forces more women to produce said living human beings so they can be cruel to them too.
Which is why we need to reframe it completely. Being pro life needs to mean something other than just being against choice.
 
In light of this thread, it has been obvious for literal decades that the pro-life movement cares only about unborn fetuses and not living human beings.
That is akin to saying we shouldn't have laws against murdering people if we don't support cradle-to-the-grave socialism. The pro-life movement cares about not giving a smile and a nod to mothers killing their children. Speaking for myself, I support a social safety net for the indigent, and we have one. Where we seem to disagree is my wanting to use our social safety net to help those who need it while the pro-choice crowd support maintaining the choice to kill off some of the most vulnerable so they aren't a drain on the system. The callous disregard for human life is a thing I'll never be able to wrap my head around.
 
Deporting American children who are sick with cancer is wrong. Those who rationalize this way are moral degenerates. Their values are completely alien to what America and liberal democracy is. I’d love to buy them a first class one way ticket to Russia, a place that’s more in alignment with their values.
 
Back
Top