What's new
By:

Roles on Jazzfanz

Babypeterzz and I have much bigger schlongs than Mohammed. Him and I took a trip to Stovakor, Valhalla, Shangri-la, Candy Land, or whatever the **** and whipped out rulers and more. We were both bigger than his stupid winged horse he rode in on, too. We opted to not join in the defiling of virgins, though.
 
The Black Swordsman said:
I would love you to quote were it says winged horse in the Qur'an.
Click to expand...

It's not in the Quran. There wasn't enough space for it, since about a forth of the Quran is "god" bragging about what a pimp he is, another dedicated to threats of doom to all who oppose, a third is stories stolen from the bible without much understanding, and lastly hilarious Islam-exclusive stories like how incredibly hot Yusef is, or Solomon's Aquaman superpowers. The Hadith however, has plenty of talk about Al Buraq.

I don't understand how you're not embarrassed to believe in that lousy piece of literature.
 
Hey guys! Lover here.

Gay_Guys.jpg
 
SiroMar said:
It's not in the Quran. There wasn't enough space for it, since about a forth of the Quran is "god" bragging about what a pimp he is, another dedicated to threats of doom to all who oppose, a third is stories stolen from the bible without much understanding, and lastly hilarious Islam-exclusive stories like how incredibly hot Yusef is, or Solomon's Aquaman superpowers. The Hadith however, has plenty of talk about Al Buraq.

I don't understand how you're not embarrassed to believe in that lousy piece of literature.
Click to expand...

1/5 of the Qur'an is direct scientific claims some of them not known at the time it was written, none of it proven to be false to this day. The Qur'an takes stories from the bible and corrects them. Also the Qur'an is shorter then the Bible, how is running out of space any sort of argument?

For example: In the Qur'an the ruler in the time of Moses was called Pharaoh, however in the time of Yusuf he was called King. People wondered this for centures why it did a distinction. However, in 1799 the roseta stone was discovered and it allowed the egyptian hieroglyphics to be read. It stated that in the time of Moses he was called Pharaoh. The title Pharaoh wasn't used for the ruler of Egypt until the years after Prophet Yusuf's dead and the ruler at that time he was called King.
At the of Muhammad the egyptian heiroglyphics was a dead language as well just as it was until 1799.

The Bible and the Torah used the title of Pharaoh and King without distinction, and was written 700+ years before the Qur'an.

The difference between me and SiroMar is that I provide rational evidence to support my claims and SiroMar makes stuff up.
 
The Black Swordsman said:
1/5 of the Qur'an is direct scientific claims some of them not known at the time it was written, none of it proven to be false to this day. The Qur'an takes stories from the bible and corrects them. Also the Qur'an is shorter then the Bible, how is running out of space any sort of argument?

For example: In the Qur'an the ruler in the time of Moses was called Pharaoh, however in the time of Yusuf he was called King. People wondered this for centures why it did a distinction. However, in 1799 the roseta stone was discovered and it allowed the egyptian hieroglyphics to be read. It stated that in the time of Moses he was called Pharaoh. The title Pharaoh wasn't used for the ruler of Egypt until the years after Prophet Yusuf's dead and the ruler at that time he was called King.
At the of Muhammad the egyptian heiroglyphics was a dead language as well just as it was until 1799.

The Bible and the Torah used the title of Pharaoh and King without distinction, and was written 700+ years before the Qur'an.

The difference between me and SiroMar is that I provide rational evidence to support my claims and SiroMar makes stuff up.
Click to expand...

From now on, I'll just use my signature for verses from the Quran. Good comedy must always be shared.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top