Romney Fundraiser - Secret Taping
- Thread starter candrew
- Start date
My take on that is that the majority of the things your write are wrong.
I am unlikely to understand anything you write in the future as well.
no arguments there
So we're in agreement that you make no sense. Sweet!
If this can happen there is no reason the Isaelis and Palestinians cannot reach peace.
Considering the very first president received upwards of $200,000,000.00 in gold equivalent for his 8 years in office... did you learn your US history from Fidel Castro?
---
Solving the debt problem is as easy as quadrupling the Federal Reserve's balance sheet. Ben Bernanke should run for president in 2016.
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
I never really looked at that, so maybe he did lol.
Then again, we also wanted George Washington to be a king.
The rest of the truth is, congressmen used to have other jobs and career politicians virtually didn't exist.
I would love for the Fed to keep injecting more backless paper junk into our economy, that way we can end this sooner rather than later.
Go QE3!
I disagree, in part only. Considering the FF's were a pretty smart group of strangely all white men, I tend to support all career politicians making huge salaries just like all of them did. Why should politicians have to constantly look over their shoulder & cater to their dumb *** constituents?
I agree full heartedly on siding with their advice on everything including printing all the money necessary to accomplish Washington's goals though. Hell, I threw a huge party when QE3 was announced.
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
Oh I don't know, maybe because it's their job?
Just a thought.
It's all good bro, I'm glad you buy into the Washington machine.
Hell, I'll be throwing a huge party when countries stop using the dollar as their reserve currency, and the United States credit rating gets downgraded.
****..... I'm late to the party again.
Oh put me on the park guest lisp, bro. Americans going back to work is worth getting smashed over.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Jewish success and Japanese success are two different things I have been reading about over the past few months. Well, before school started at least. Very interesting stuff. I know the Japanese have completely different perspective of work ethics, and looking at the trasnofrmation that their country went through through the turn of the 20th century is really quite remarkable. But yes, I think you're right here.
Well, I never actually caught these posts until I skimmed through this thread a second time. Just wanna point out that a) frank, you're pretty on point here (moreso than myself, which is why I usually try to stay out of these types of discussions because I know I am outclassed knowledge-wise by some of you) and b) my purpose wasn't trying to concoct a feel-bad story to try and get people to sympathize with the poor.
I just feel like way too many poor people are stuck in socioeconomic 'ruts', and we have to try and devise a few ways to coax people out of them, particularly inner-city youth, African-American youth, and so on.
Interesting report I;ve read, that you would probably be interested as well frank (as well as anyone else who's interested):https://www.pewstates.org/uploadedFiles/PCS_Assets/2012/Pursuing_American_Dream.pdf
Yes, >80% of people make more money than their parents; however, pay attention to what it says about the stickiness at the sides. I dunno, maybe I shall look further into this issue.
As human beings, it is our responsibility to watch out for each other. As an individual, I can't help the guy who is suffering in Denver, but the government can.
There are a few common sense tweeks that need to be made to the welfare system that we use, but even then there will be leeches. You don't cut off your nose to spite your face. (unless you're Slopper, in which case I'd start just below the chin and make my way up) The day that we give up trying to help is the day that we have utterly failed as a race/species/whatever.
There are a few common sense tweeks that need to be made to the welfare system that we use, but even then there will be leeches. You don't cut off your nose to spite your face. (unless you're Slopper, in which case I'd start just below the chin and make my way up) The day that we give up trying to help is the day that we have utterly failed as a race/species/whatever.
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
Oh yeah, the government has shown over the years that they're pro at running almost anything.
Education: Wonderful
Healthcare: Impeccable
Social Security: Perfect
Tax System: Freakin A
Protecting rights: Awesome
Defending the country: Spectacular
I just don't know how else to describe my amazing United States government....
****, I need a tissue now.
I agree that we need to improve graduation rates for all poor people. Do you acknowledge that being severly poor, having hunger issues, etc. will pull down graduation rates?
I also think you underestimate the effects of example. Let's say that in group A, your probability of acheiving a cdertain level of income are 80% when you matriculate to a certain college, and 40% when you don't. In group B, those numbers are 30% and 15% respectively. Even thought a college education doubles your chances for both, can you see why group B would be less inclined to pursue it, why the "benefits of education" have less meaning for them?
Finally, you did not respond directlhy to my questions on whether there was such a thing as too much income mobility. However, I will answer one of yours that I have given some more thought. Income mobility is a measure, not a goal. Unless you're a professional weightlifter, you don't lift weights for the purpose of lifting more weight, and lifting more weight is not the primary goal. It's a measure of general, overall strength increase.
How'd I do. Be honest.
I honestly do not think she has any interest in making a legit arguement. She is going for shock and wants to put people off. I won't call her a dup account (because I have no knowledge of such) but her goal is the same.
