What's new

Sharia Law vs. Muslim Tolerance

Screw everyone who calls you names. Who categorizes you. I have called you none of those. What I called was the route of generalization oftenly leading to bad paths, inhuman paths. You see, people tend to worship power, get hypnotized by it too easily. Fascistic power risings feast on this. But humanity couldn't exist if it only survived on power struggle. What makes us human, what is the right and just call for us is to say "Hey look at that guy in his golden limo. What an *******" instead of "Hey liberals, look. Muslims are assholes who hate gays and stone people."


What you can't see is that defending rotten apples because they happen to be apples is the route of generalization.
 
It is kinda hard to do so when you get called a fascist, islamophobe, racist, misogynist, xenophobe or whatever demagogic term liberals come up with to shut down debate.

What about bitch, cunning runt, gutter trash, low-life scum on the tip of a diseased wang?
 
What does a family of atheist lawyer trolls have to do with anything?

Nice try. Mr. Phelps and family definitely considered themselves "good" Christians who believe in an almighty savior. Do you share their views on homosexuals, US soldiers, etc? Please advise.
 
What you can't see is that defending rotten apples because they happen to be apples is the route of generalization.

And why would I not be able to see it? I told you to care less for the people that categorizes you no matter which side of the political scale they appear. I'm not a fanatic of anything. I'm not an idealist, except for trying to do the best you can to be just and a good person and I try picking the best out of every idealism and thought to form a personal ideals system that makes sense to me. I don't defend apples because they are apples. Whoever does is open to being accused of generalization. I understand that you have your own government that has everything covered to not like Muslims so much anymore after the attack. But know that some people value others above being apples and oranges, they are not blinded by a certain idealism and protect their brethren, they just try to be a good person. I try to be one. And this leads you to do things and believe in people who you thought you never would.
 
It is kinda hard to do so when you get called a fascist, islamophobe, racist, misogynist, xenophobe or whatever demagogic term liberals come up with to shut down debate.

Oh God, this is so rich. You generalize posters with debate-destroying terms more than anyone on these forums.


Everyone check out the Creationism thread, and see how many scientific posts that PearlWatson refutes by using the word "Darwinist"-- even in light of numerous posters specifying that they are not atheists.

Pathetic.
 
Oh God, this is so rich. You generalize posters with debate-destroying terms more than anyone on these forums.


Everyone check out the Creationism thread, and see how many scientific posts that PearlWatson refutes by using the word "Darwinist"-- even in light of numerous posters specifying that they are not atheists.

Pathetic.

My favorite part about this post is the fact that PearlSlopper will not respond.
 
Oh God, this is so rich. You generalize posters with debate-destroying terms more than anyone on these forums.

When the only instrument you understand is a hammer, you see every other instrument out there as a hammer, as well.
 
Oh God, this is so rich. You generalize posters with debate-destroying terms more than anyone on these forums.


Everyone check out the Creationism thread, and see how many scientific posts that PearlWatson refutes by using the word "Darwinist"-- even in light of numerous posters specifying that they are not atheists.

Pathetic.

You don't have to be an atheist to be a Darwinist, as you have shown.
 
And why would I not be able to see it? I told you to care less for the people that categorizes you no matter which side of the political scale they appear. I'm not a fanatic of anything. I'm not an idealist, except for trying to do the best you can to be just and a good person and I try picking the best out of every idealism and thought to form a personal ideals system that makes sense to me. I don't defend apples because they are apples. Whoever does is open to being accused of generalization. I understand that you have your own government that has everything covered to not like Muslims so much anymore after the attack. But know that some people value others above being apples and oranges, they are not blinded by a certain idealism and protect their brethren, they just try to be a good person. I try to be one. And this leads you to do things and believe in people who you thought you never would.

I ain't talking personally. As a female conservative in a liberal male mob, on this forum, I'm used to idiotic attacks. I'm talking generally, in the media, during political discourse.

I can appreciate your personal philosophy, but can you explain to me your knowledge of Benito Mussolini and how he came to power.
 
I ain't talking personally. As a female conservative in a liberal male mob, on this forum, I'm used to idiotic attacks. I'm talking generally, in the media, during political discourse.

I can appreciate your personal philosophy, but can you explain to me your knowledge of Benito Mussolini and how he came to power.


I already did. People are like flies attacking to the bright light when it comes to power. (No offense humanity!)
 
The fascism part was absurd.




It is kinda hard to do so when you get called a fascist, islamophobe, racist, misogynist, xenophobe or whatever demagogic term liberals come up with to shut down debate.


BTW this totally is a generalizable conceptual situation. I hate it too. In here, if you say anything good about being a Turk, you celebrate a national thing, you get called a fascist, a racist by certain people led by radical Islamists and separatists.
 
BTW this totally is a generalizable conceptual situation. I hate it too. In here, if you say anything good about being a Turk, you celebrate a national thing, you get called a fascist, a racist by certain people led by radical Islamists and separatists.

PearlWatson is about the only person on this forum that would do, and has done, those things.
 
BTW this totally is a generalizable conceptual situation. I hate it too. In here, if you say anything good about being a Turk, you celebrate a national thing, you get called a fascist, a racist by certain people led by radical Islamists and separatists.

I thought you were the one defining fascism as national pride, that is why I was asking you to elaborate on Mussolini. I don't think having pride in your country is necessarily a bad thing.

I didn't know you were a Turk, and have no preconceived notions about what it means to be one. I know idividuals from Jordan, Lebanon, and Armenia, but not Turkey.
 
I thought you were the one defining fascism as national pride, that is why I was asking you to elaborate on Mussolini. I don't think having pride in your country is necessarily a bad thing.

I didn't know you were a Turk, and have no preconceived notions about what it means to be one. I know idividuals from Jordan, Lebanon, and Armenia, but not Turkey.

Well, being a one pretty much means to be that person i your quote. Goddamn traitors trying to destroy everything we've earned by our ancestors blood. By ancestors I mean both women and men. And kids.
 
I already did. People are like flies attacking to the bright light when it comes to power. (No offense humanity!)

attaching?

Obama_fly_2010_2461812c.jpg
 
Back
Top