What's new
By:

Should Mitt release his tax returns?

franklin said:
You mean expenses offset revenues? Oh the humanity! Who invented all this accounting and tax bull **** in the first place? I think small businesses should invest everything and not get to write off a single dime. It'll be so risky to start a business that nobody but government subsidized industries will try. Hell yeah, commie, that's the way to go.
Click to expand...

Lies and misdirections. Give us your sources.
 
northeast said:
Since you keep piling one lie onto another and are a stickler for sources, why don't you tell us where it does support what you said?
Click to expand...

Well done. You are honing your skill of redirecting a question without supporting yourself in anyway.
 
northeast said:
Since you keep piling one lie onto another and are a stickler for sources, why don't you tell us where it does support what you said?
Click to expand...

Why don't you tell us why you're a communist hellbent on destroying every middle class American business? We already import enough pencils and rubber stamps. Why should we have to import puppy dogs and kittens too?
 
franklin said:
Why don't you tell us why you're a communist hellbent on destroying every middle class American business? We already import enough pencils and rubber stamps. Why should we have to import puppy dogs and kittens too?
Click to expand...

Have you filled out the necassary tariff and import forms? If not you are looking at hefty fines...
 
Franklin: Lies, misdirections. Stop saying I am saying things I am not saying. Show us how your sources support what you are saying, instead of just making things up and lying.
 
No, I did reference my sources. You just want me to repeat myself, because you are a psycho who gets enjoyment out of annoying people.
 
northeast said:
No, I did reference my sources. You just want me to repeat myself, because you are a psycho who gets enjoyment out of annoying people.
Click to expand...

No not really. You come in with left field questions which is fine. The problem you have is when that same tactic is used against you.

Franklin asked you several direct questions. Your response to those is "you answer it". If that is your approach then sweet. Just don't be hyocritical about it.

As for the psycho comment...F it why not. RAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
northeast said:
Franklin: Lies, misdirections. Stop saying I am saying things I am not saying. Show us how your sources support what you are saying, instead of just making things up and lying.
Click to expand...

Here's a story I hope will soften your callous heart:


My grandfather came across the ocean with nothing but a dollar in his pocket when he stepped off the boat. He worked 90 hours a week saving for a breeding business he had dreamed of owning since childhood. It took him 13 years of hard labor inside the coal mines to save up enough money to buy a partnership share of his very first pair of prize winning Irish Terriers. From his investment portion of those two pups, he went on to built a kennel of 8 breeds and close to 200 dogs. He sold championship dogs to millionaires across the world, and used his profits to not only feed his family but to also support 3 local orphanages. In effect, he gathered money from the rich and redistributed it to the hungry poor.

All of this hard work would not have been possible if heartless people like ***...*** have their way. Every dollar invested would be a loss and every dollar of revenue taxed at the maximum rate. It would be so draconian that only millionaires and billionaires could start new businesses. Either that or more importing from China.
Click to expand...
 
So Franklin, show us where your source says that the Romney's will not be able take a tax deduction on the losses on their fancy horse if it does not make a profit, because I read your source, and it seemed to say exactly the opposite, just like the Forbes article explained. We quoted the Forbes article. Give us the arcane quote from the pages of IRS gobblydygook that say otherwise. I looked , and I didn't see it, which means unless you can quote it, you are a liar.
 
SaltyDawg said:
Romney could wipe his *** with $77,000 and it wouldn't make him change his lifestyle at all. He'd still have so much money he wouldn't even miss it in his day to day activities or any of his future plans. So for him to take that deduction, which I have no problem with him taking, is actually worse to me than the guy who got laid off during the recession who gets $100 per month in food stamps so his kids can eat.
Click to expand...

So now you're attacking the food stamp recipient parents of starving children? They're bad, just not as bad as Romney huh.
 
franklin said:
So now you're attacking the food stamp recipient parents of starving children? They're bad, just not as bad as Romney huh.
Click to expand...

Nope. You may be a great CPA or whatever, but you sure have a reading comprehension problem.

Neither taking a legal tax deduction, nor getting food stamps when you're down on your luck are a bad thing. What is bad is when you're a rich ******* taking every deduction and credit you can possibly get, even though you wouldn't even notice the money was missing if you didn't take it, and you have the nerve to scold the food stamp recipients for getting free stuff from the government.

It's not a system problem, it's a Romney being a hypocritical douchebag problem.
 
franklin, just making stuff up, lying, and demanding others answer his stupid questions, when he won't explain why he lied about Romney's taxes.
 
northeast said:
franklin, just making stuff up, lying, and demanding others answer his stupid questions, when he won't explain why he lied about Romney's taxes.
Click to expand...

I thought the whole point about this was so you could prove Romney is a liar?

I have heard that if you tell yourself something enough times that you will begin to believe it. How many times do you have to say franklin lied before you believe it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top