What's new
By:

SloanFAIL!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
What did he say in his rep comment?

BTW, did kicky ever get an infraction for clogging the board? The mod staff never got back to me out that.
 
Archie Moses said:
What did he say in his rep comment?

BTW, did kicky ever get an infraction for clogging the board? The mod staff never got back to me out that.
Click to expand...

archie, think about your question for a second (hopefully it won't take any longer) - - it was an inappropriate comment - we aren't going to post it here! Suffice it to say it was a personal attack that was worse than what you'll generally see posted on the board.
 
moevillini said:
archie, think about your question for a second (hopefully it won't take any longer) - - it was an inappropriate comment - we aren't going to post it here! Suffice it to say it was a personal attack that was worse than what you'll generally see posted on the board.
Click to expand...

I didn't want it word for word. Personal attack works for me, unless he called someone a troll or something. Although, if you're going to start banning someone for the rep system, wouldn't it be easier just to get rid of it?
 
Archie Moses said:
I didn't want it word for word. Personal attack works for me, unless he called someone a troll or something. Although, if you're going to start banning someone for the rep system, wouldn't it be easier just to get rid of it?
Click to expand...

LMBO! this is exactly what happened to me...no even WORSE!!!!

katie DMC neg rep me and called me a troll...i return the favor and I get an "INFRACTION"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Millsapa said:
An infraction for rep comments? Ridiculous double standard in my opinion.
Click to expand...

How is it a double standard? If anyone reports rep we vote on it. It's just like someone posting a message. I've had crap thrown at me thru rep, but I do not report anything against me. Hell, feel free to call me anything and I promise you I won't report it (though I can't stop anyone else from not reporting it). I think Sloanie recently called me a libtard in the rep. I gave it the half eye-roll that it deserved and moved on. But I don't get consistently harassed like some others here, so maybe that's why my skin is still thick.
 
Nate505 said:
How is it a double standard? If anyone reports rep we vote on it. It's just like someone posting a message. I've had crap thrown at me thru rep, but I do not report anything against me. Hell, feel free to call me anything and I promise you I won't report it (though I can't stop anyone else from not reporting it). I think Sloanie recently called me a libtard in the rep. I gave it the half eye-roll that it deserved and moved on. But I don't get consistently harassed like some others here, so maybe that's why my skin is still thick.
Click to expand...

You are really asking how it is a double standard when you give one person a warning for consistently harassing rep comments and another person an infraction for consistently harassed rep comments?

I guess one of the two being harassed must have special forum status.
 
Millsapa said:
You are really asking how it is a double standard when you give one person a warning for consistently harassing rep comments and another person an infraction for consistently harassed rep comments?

I guess one of the two being harassed must have special forum status.
Click to expand...

Which person is consistently getting warned about harassing rep comments? There aren't many reports about rep comments in general.
 
KatieMCR said:
Finally.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY0WxgSXdEE
Click to expand...


Please don't use a band I hold in such high accord, as a soundtrack to such trivial message board matters.

You wouldn't want me to say something like "Sloanfeld was just born that way" or "I guess Sloanfeld got pushed off the edge of glory".

Thanks
Joker
 
Nate505 said:
Except if you go to the thread that the rep was based on, you were the one who fired the first salvo.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, but I do believe you're mistaken. She called me a troll at 1:30. I responded 20 minutes later. If you look at the JohnStockalypse account that was WRONGLY deleted as a duplicate account, you'll see that she did the same thing to me in THAT name!!!!

SHE is the one who was trolling ME!!! And then you say you can;t guarantee the same result for a WORSE offense!!!?????!!!?? What is going on here??!!
 
I don't think so. Your second comment in that thread was telling her to quit "trolling that singer." She responded back that you were the troll, you called her a troll face, and the stupidity even continued into rep.

As for not being able to guarantee an infraction, it takes three votes for one. I am only one vote, so if I even felt it was worthy of one I can only provide 1/3rd of the result. And that's why I can't guarantee anything.
 
Sloanfeld really is insane.

Did you notice how he never once admited to making mistakes. It was always someone else.
Jason is corrupt. The mods are out to get him. The Boozer haters are out to get him. blah blah blah.
I never heard once hey maybe I should cool it down a bit, and not try to annoy anyone. Maybe I can do A, B, or C.
It was always Sloanfeld knowing he was pissing people off, knowing he was about to get banned, but never admiting he had
anything to do with it.

Good riddance old buddy.
 
Any moron can keep their nose clean on this site if they want to. Sloanfeld was a troll, an instigator, an idiot. I shed no tears for him today.
 
Last edited:
This site is corrupt? How funny is that? This site is owned by Jason and he has complete control over how he wants it run. If he was to ban people he finds annoying that would be his right. If he changes the rules to accommodate the kind of posts and posters he wants participating on his site, that would be alright, too. Not a single one of us is entitled to participate here. We do so at Jason's pleasure. Keep that in mind and I'll bet you'll get along here just fine.

This isn't the public square and stupidity does not have to be tolerated.
 
Gameface said:
This site is corrupt? How funny is that? This site is owned by Jason and he has complete control over how he wants it run. If he was to ban people he finds annoying that would be his right. If he changes the rules to accommodate the kind of posts and posters he wants participating on his site, that would be alright, too. Not a single one of us is entitled to participate here. We do so at Jason's pleasure. Keep that in mind and I'll bet you'll get along here just fine.

This isn't the public square and stupidity does not have to be tolerated.
Click to expand...
Bingo.

And Jason is as solid as they come. Having been a moderator, I can attest to him not overstepping the bounds that he sets for himself. He tries to be fair, and allows the moderators to do their jobs with minimal (if any) interference. I'm sure the other mods (both past and present) would confirm this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page
Back
Top