I thought "phsycology" was not a legitimate science? This thread must make you dizzy.
So gay!!!
- Thread starter TroutBum
- Start date
I thought "phsycology" was not a legitimate science? This thread must make you dizzy.
Now you're catching on. I went through some 30 pages of this with him. As they say, it's like nailing jello to a wall.
billyshelby
Well-Known Member
Cool. Just for fun, we'll put beantown on the left.
That way your sexual organs won't touch, and it won't biologically be gay. Win/Win.
JJ Rage
Active Member
And none of that changes the fact that procreation and evolution have nothing to due with marriage.
Last time I checked, that's what we were supposed to be talking about, right?
Beantown
Well-Known Member
I base my opinions about marriage on the natural laws our human species is bound by.
Beantown
Well-Known Member
If homosexuals can produce offspring and participate in evolution and genetic diversity I will happily change my opinion.
They can.
Marty McFly
Well-Known Member
What the crap does marriage have to do with any natural law? Also, I think your understanding of natural law has already been proven to be retarded. About 50 times. By about 50 different posters.
Please. Just stop.
Beantown
Well-Known Member
Only if they participate in heterosexual relations.
Beantown
Well-Known Member
So basing social opinions on the basic natural laws of our species is a bad idea?.........whatever bro
Really? Where does invitro fertilization fall in the wide span of biology and evolution? What do your "handfull" of biologists and evolutionists think of that?
Marty McFly
Well-Known Member
Basic natural law? Does naturally being attracted to the same sex count?
billyshelby
Well-Known Member
I'd settle for just seeing the think tank beantown regularly consults with.
Marty McFly
Well-Known Member
I'd kill to see a transcript of this conversation.
Beantown: So, when do you expect the gays to die out? Since they can't procreate and all.
Evolutionist: Excuse me?
Beantown: Yeah, you know. Natural law.
Evolutionist: No offense, but do you require machine assistance to breathe?
Beantown
Well-Known Member
Thats the debate, I dont believe they are natural and come from environmental factors or in some cases gender disorders.
Marty McFly
Well-Known Member
Which we're still waiting for some evidence of. There are tons of studies that homosexuals are born that way.
A simple Wiki search:
* Gay men report, on an average, slightly longer and thicker penises than non-gay men.[48]
* Gay men and straight women have, on average, equally proportioned brain hemispheres. Lesbian women and straight men have, on average, slightly larger right brain hemispheres.[49]
* The VIP SCN nucleus of the hypothalamus is larger in men than in women, and larger in gay men than in heterosexual men.[50]
* The average size of the INAH-3 in the brains of gay men is approximately the same size as INAH 3 in women, which is significantly smaller, and the cells more densely packed, than in heterosexual men's brains.[28]
* The anterior commissure is larger in women than men and was reported to be larger in gay men than in non-gay men,[27] but a subsequent study found no such difference.[51]
* Gay men's brains respond differently to fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.[52]
* The functioning of the inner ear and the central auditory system in lesbians and bisexual women are more like the functional properties found in men than in non-gay women (the researchers argued this finding was consistent with the prenatal hormonal theory of sexual orientation).[53]
* The suprachiasmatic nucleus was found by Swaab and Hopffman to be larger in gay men than in non-gay men,[54] the suprachiasmatic nucleus is also known to be larger in men than in women.[55]
* The startle response (eyeblink following a loud sound) is similarly masculinized in lesbians and bisexual women.[56]
* Gay and non-gay people emit different underarm odors.[57]
* Gay and non-gay people's brains respond differently to two human sex pheromones (AND, found in male armpit secretions, and EST, found in female urine).[58][24][59]
* One region of the brain (amygdala) is more active in gay men than non-gay men when exposed to sexually arousing material.[60]
* Finger length ratios between the index and ring fingers may be different between non-gay and lesbian women.[53][61][62][63][64][65]
* Gay men and lesbians are significantly more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous than non-gay men and women;[66][67][68] Simon LeVay argues that because "[h]and preference is observable before birth[69]... [t]he observation of increased non-right-handness in gay people is therefore consistent with the idea that sexual orientation is influenced by prenatal processes," perhaps heredity.[28]
* A study of 50 gay men found 23% had counterclockwise hair whirl, as opposed to 8% in the general population. This may correlate with left-handedness.[70]
* Gay men have increased ridge density in the fingerprints on their left thumbs and pinkies.[70]
* Length of limbs and hands of gay men is smaller compared to height than the general population, but only among white men.[70]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation#Physiological
No, you will just change the statement you use to exclude them, as you have done in the past.
Sex is convenient, but not necessary, for sperm to meet egg.
You don't need to be that fancy. All you need is the equivalent of a turkey baster.
billyshelby
Well-Known Member
So gay people don't actually exist? They're lost on the road to straightness? All the happily gay people out there are unaware that they're not actually gay?
Again, you sight the existence of homosexuality as socially constructed or psychological disorder. You know these are premises based in sociology and psychology right? I thought you said psychology was bs.