Hmmmm, let's go through who will definitely be an All-Star 2 years from now. 12 man roster. I think they usually like to keep a balance of at least 2 PG's and 2 true big men. That leaves 8 spots for G/F.
(G) Chris Paul (if still in West after contract) (Also a lock for fan vote)
(G) Westrbook
(F) Durant (Lock for fan votes)
(F) Griffin (future lock for fan votes)
(F) Nowitzki
(G) Bryant (he will get fan voted in until he retires)
Those are the six guys that I am 100% sure they will be All-Stars two years down the road. That leaves 6 more people. I guess Hayward has a chance to be one of them, but I think that will be 100% tied to the Jazz having an outstanding season. Other players will be able to out stat him (which is 75% of what being an All-Star is), but if the Jazz have a strong season with Hayward being viewed as an X-Factor (ala Ginobili to Spurs) then it can happen.
I am not sure Bryant and Dirk will be playing into two years.
I checked this out just to see what HeavenHarris contributed to this discussion and was not disappointed.
A random drawing would be the most fun; I'm not sure why any team would warrant any other method. The sucky teams last year have already gotten their high picks, and the winningest teams have already sucked up with late picks. A drawing would give the talking heads something to talk about (conspiracies, good luck, bad luck, etc.) for the entire season and then some. Better yet, do the draft as soon as the deal is done, even if it's months before the draft happens. Publicity 101.
In any case, with a backlog of up to two years to choose from (plus those who decided to skip this draft), expect it to be a very good pool of players.
Another creative tactic: Base it on profitability--the financially weakest and/or most bloated teams draft first. (I don't see the Fakers or even Donald Sterling supporting this option. Also, there would be debate on how profitability is actually measured, and it rewards those teams that have overspent and/or have been managed poorly.)
A random drawing will never happen. Could you imagine if Miami received the first pick? It would not be fair, and the NBA could not justify a future lottery if they allowed teams like LA, Bos, Mia, Orl, Dal, etc to have a shot at top 5 picks in an incredibly deep draft. There will be some NHL-style average, and the Jazz will end up around the 10-15 spot. Not too bad. It might actually help us with the GS pick. They might be a lot worse then their pick ends up being, which means we would get it.
Ignorant comment. Bryant will play until he cant walk and Dirk is only 33 (and just had arguably his best year, probably has 5 years left).
I thought that Dirk was couple of years older- but I should have remember he entered the league at 18.
Are you that sure that Bryant is still going to be able to run in 2 years? He looked fairly rundown to me.
In regards to the 2012 NBA Draft order: Wouldn't the most fair thing to do...
I have a feeling that the fans of each team would define fairness completely differently when it comes to this, but I feel pretty confident in saying that few non-Jazz fans would consider awarding Utah two lottery picks in a loaded draft to be fair.
I have a feeling that the fans of each team would define fairness completely differently when it comes to this, but I feel pretty confident in saying that few non-Jazz fans would consider awarding Utah two lottery picks in a loaded draft to be fair.
Gordon will be an All-star before CJ will.