What's new

Starting lineup with Mo, and Marvin out.

Agree completely. My point is our bench and starters need to flip flop. At the end of the day, players do care if they start or not, despite what they say publicly

Agreed. They need to flip flop but it is not going to happen unless injury or trade comes about.
 
I think it's pretty clear that Ty is prejudice. He has a bad case of kiddiephobia. He hates to start the kiddies, but prays they bail them out after the starters stink up the gym.
 
Demarre gets the start as predicted in this thread.

When will Ty start Burks, Hayward, Favors & Kanter ?

The 2nd unit will win this game but time to show respect to these guys or they will leave as soon as they can

Well, they are getting time together...as the 2nd unit. I'm ok with that. As many have said, when Jefferson is in the game, there is no ball movement. If we can't get rid of Al, then the next best solution is to have the players of the future grow together as a unit. What I do like is that Burks is finally getting a little playing time.
 
We don't have a proven linuep.
There's a difference between making a change to the lineup, and not having a point guard on the floor.

Say hello to Mr. Whether we're playing .250 ball or championship ball, I'll always be optimistic about my teams decisions.... even if they evidently suck.
Great. Then you can be Mr. I'll complain about anything and everything, always demanding that the flavor of the month start, even if they are as ****ty as Fesenko.

I've been screaming for this line up all along. I'm just glad we got to see it when the game was on the line.
If it was good enough for the end of the Dallas game why not roll with it? Either way it's good to see Corbin try
these things.

I also loved the Favors defensive sub late in the Dallas game.
I hope the lineup can work, but it needs to be shown to be effective against multiple teams before we start it and play it the majority of the game.
 
There's a difference between making a change to the lineup, and not having a point guard on the floor.

Great. Then you can be Mr. I'll complain about anything and everything, always demanding that the flavor of the month start, even if they are as ****ty as Fesenko.

I hope the lineup can work, but it needs to be shown to be effective against multiple teams before we start it and play it the majority of the game.
Well the offense looked better this game with Burks at PG than it really ever does with Tinsley or Watson. It was against the Bobcats. But it still looked better then when the other 2 were on the floor.

And again what lineup have we used this season that has consistently shown to be effective? It sure as **** is not our starting lineup.
 
Well the offense looked better this game with Burks at PG than it really ever does with Tinsley or Watson. It was against the Bobcats. But it still looked better then when the other 2 were on the floor.

And again what lineup have we used this season that has consistently shown to be effective? It sure as **** is not our starting lineup.

What Tinsley ran the offense beautifuly in the 1st half, he got everyone good looks.

It was Watson that gave up the big lead.
 
What Tinsley ran the offense beautifuly in the 1st half, he got everyone good looks.

It was Watson that gave up the big lead.
Was not nearly as good in the 2nd half. I am hoping that Burks proves to be a decent PG because the 2 guys we have right now are terrible.
 
There's a difference between making a change to the lineup, and not having a point guard on the floor.

Great. Then you can be Mr. I'll complain about anything and everything, always demanding that the flavor of the month start, even if they are as ****ty as Fesenko.

I hope the lineup can work, but it needs to be shown to be effective against multiple teams before we start it and play it the majority of the game.

Marvin Williams is not as bad or as ***ty as Fesenko.
 
Back
Top