What's new

Steve Bannon Quotes

Serious question, what do you think of the emoluments clause in regard to Trump upholding constitutional government?
I'll have to review this. I thought, when I was in a High School American History class taught by Merton Lovell, our really laid back humorist/sports enthusiast who spent more time talking about our school football games, whose class I used to do my chemistry or trigonometry homework, that this meant no quid for any desired quo.
Accordingly, I wouldn't consider it legal for Hillary or Trump to profit personally from the office, and would want to prosecute our band of revolving door executive branch officials/industrial lobbyists.
I don't think Hillary will be prosecuted for the bribes that went to the Clinton Foundation.
It looks to me like Trump wants to invoke the JFK/Reagan tax model and deregulate American industries. Generally, not just his own, or his cronies.
I think Trump will do a sort of Amnesty that deports criminals effectively, enforces American wage levels and eliminates freebies for anyone not employed in compliant jobs and paying all the required contributions and taxes. There will be a first come/first served waiting list for legal immigration, and it will take years to get citizenship. Employers who cheat on the new system will pay huge fines, so citizens will have a level playing field and definitely a chance for good jobs.'
 
I'll have to review this. I thought, when I was in a High School American History class taught by Merton Lovell, our really laid back humorist/sports enthusiast who spent more time talking about our school football games, whose class I used to do my chemistry or trigonometry homework, that this meant no quid for any desired quo.
Accordingly, I wouldn't consider it legal for Hillary or Trump to profit personally from the office, and would want to prosecute our band of revolving door executive branch officials/industrial lobbyists.
I don't think Hillary will be prosecuted for the bribes that went to the Clinton Foundation.
It looks to me like Trump wants to invoke the JFK/Reagan tax model and deregulate American industries. Generally, not just his own, or his cronies.
I think Trump will do a sort of Amnesty that deports criminals effectively, enforces American wage levels and eliminates freebies for anyone not employed in compliant jobs and paying all the required contributions and taxes. There will be a first come/first served waiting list for legal immigration, and it will take years to get citizenship. Employers who cheat on the new system will pay huge fines, so citizens will have a level playing field and definitely a chance for good jobs.'

He's already done the quid pro quo thing with the building codes in Argentina, the renting of an entire floor in Trump tower for the secret service, the renting of his pennsylvania ave hotel to foreign dignitaries, and maybe more. He's already gaining financially fro the office.
 
He's already done the quid pro quo thing with the building codes in Argentina, the renting of an entire floor in Trump tower for the secret service, the renting of his pennsylvania ave hotel to foreign dignitaries, and maybe more. He's already gaining financially fro the office.

That space was not empty before an he gave a discounted price to assure no bad ill. He also ended a lease an went without rent on that floor during the campaign in anticipation of a win.

Trump is a real American.
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/8461d78c-ffa6-3752-873a-4a1e02cfb0e5/why-a-weekend-of-raging-trump.html
Donald Trump closed out the Thanksgiving holiday weekend by tweeting an outrageous lie about the 2016 election.

"In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally," the president-elect tweeted on Sunday.

He went on to directly target states he lost: "Serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire and California — so why isn't the media reporting on this? Serious bias — big problem!"

To begin with the obvious: There is no evidence whatsoever that any of this happened. The claim of millions voting illegally appears to have come from a "story" published by conspiracy website Infowars, which has also promulgated claims that the Sandy Hook massacre was faked and Hillary Clinton is a "demon from hell."

Serious election observers quickly condemned Trump, pointing out that instances of noncitizens voting are vanishingly rare. "We know historically that this almost never happens," David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research, told Politico. "You're more likely to get eaten by a shark that simultaneously gets hit by lightning than to find a noncitizen voting."

One common theory about Trump's unhinged tweets is that they are calculated to draw attention away from more serious and more damaging stories. In this case, the election tweets followed a lengthy investigation by The New York Times into Trump's sprawling global business empire and how his own personal financial interests could shade his decisions as president. Trump has already shown no real desire to separate himself from his businesses — beyond saying his children will be in charge — and argued that it's legally impossible for the president to have a conflict of interest.

It's possible the distraction theory could have some merit. But the simpler answer is probably the correct one. Trump simply cannot stand the fact that while he won a narrow Electoral College majority, he now trails Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton by nearly 2 million votes. Trump is also reportedly enraged by Green Party nominee Jill Stein's efforts to push a recount in Wisconsin, where he won by just 27,257 votes. Stein, who is also pushing for recounts in Michigan and Pennsylvania, won 30,000 votes in Wisconsin. So her recount effort there seems aimed at proving she did not cost Clinton the state rather than altering the actual result.

The Hillary Clinton campaign has not pushed the recount effort but said it would participate to ensure fairness. None of the recount efforts are likely to alter the result. Trump is going to be president.

But his raging tweets show just how thin his skin really is and how unlikely he will be as president to smoothly handle any insults or criticism from foreign leaders or opponents on Capitol Hill.

The Sunday tweet storm also helped obscure a disturbing story that broke just before Thanksgiving reporting that Trump is turning away daily briefings from national security officials. Trump spokeswoman Kellyanne Conway explained that Trump is getting intelligence information from other sources but declined to elaborate on who those sources might be.

And Trump himself is not talking to the press. He hasn't held a news conference in four months, letting his transition process devolve into a series of leaks and extraordinarily public fights.

Conway took the unprecedented step on Sunday of publicly urging her boss not to pick Romney for secretary of state, saying Trump's supporters "feel betrayed" by consideration of the 2012 nominee, a highly respected figure in the GOP establishment.



Now Trump is reportedly meeting with retired general David Petraeus on Monday to discuss the secretary of state job. Petraeus resigned in disgrace from the CIA in 2012 after acknowledging that he shared classified information with Paula Broadwell during an extra-marital affair. Petraeus agreed to plead to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized possession of classified information.

A Petraeus pick would come after Trump spent months on the campaign trail hammering Clinton for using a personal email account during her tenure as secretary of state, arguing that it compromised classified information. Trump, after campaigning as a champion of forgotten blue collar voters in the Rust Belt, is also stocking his administration with millionaires and billionaires.
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/8461d78c-ffa6-3752-873a-4a1e02cfb0e5/why-a-weekend-of-raging-trump.html
Donald Trump closed out the Thanksgiving holiday weekend by tweeting an outrageous lie about the 2016 election.

"In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally," the president-elect tweeted on Sunday.

He went on to directly target states he lost: "Serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire and California — so why isn't the media reporting on this? Serious bias — big problem!"

To begin with the obvious: There is no evidence whatsoever that any of this happened. The claim of millions voting illegally appears to have come from a "story" published by conspiracy website Infowars, which has also promulgated claims that the Sandy Hook massacre was faked and Hillary Clinton is a "demon from hell."

Serious election observers quickly condemned Trump, pointing out that instances of noncitizens voting are vanishingly rare. "We know historically that this almost never happens," David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research, told Politico. "You're more likely to get eaten by a shark that simultaneously gets hit by lightning than to find a noncitizen voting."

One common theory about Trump's unhinged tweets is that they are calculated to draw attention away from more serious and more damaging stories. In this case, the election tweets followed a lengthy investigation by The New York Times into Trump's sprawling global business empire and how his own personal financial interests could shade his decisions as president. Trump has already shown no real desire to separate himself from his businesses — beyond saying his children will be in charge — and argued that it's legally impossible for the president to have a conflict of interest.

It's possible the distraction theory could have some merit. But the simpler answer is probably the correct one. Trump simply cannot stand the fact that while he won a narrow Electoral College majority, he now trails Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton by nearly 2 million votes. Trump is also reportedly enraged by Green Party nominee Jill Stein's efforts to push a recount in Wisconsin, where he won by just 27,257 votes. Stein, who is also pushing for recounts in Michigan and Pennsylvania, won 30,000 votes in Wisconsin. So her recount effort there seems aimed at proving she did not cost Clinton the state rather than altering the actual result.

The Hillary Clinton campaign has not pushed the recount effort but said it would participate to ensure fairness. None of the recount efforts are likely to alter the result. Trump is going to be president.

But his raging tweets show just how thin his skin really is and how unlikely he will be as president to smoothly handle any insults or criticism from foreign leaders or opponents on Capitol Hill.

The Sunday tweet storm also helped obscure a disturbing story that broke just before Thanksgiving reporting that Trump is turning away daily briefings from national security officials. Trump spokeswoman Kellyanne Conway explained that Trump is getting intelligence information from other sources but declined to elaborate on who those sources might be.

And Trump himself is not talking to the press. He hasn't held a news conference in four months, letting his transition process devolve into a series of leaks and extraordinarily public fights.

Conway took the unprecedented step on Sunday of publicly urging her boss not to pick Romney for secretary of state, saying Trump's supporters "feel betrayed" by consideration of the 2012 nominee, a highly respected figure in the GOP establishment.



Now Trump is reportedly meeting with retired general David Petraeus on Monday to discuss the secretary of state job. Petraeus resigned in disgrace from the CIA in 2012 after acknowledging that he shared classified information with Paula Broadwell during an extra-marital affair. Petraeus agreed to plead to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized possession of classified information.

A Petraeus pick would come after Trump spent months on the campaign trail hammering Clinton for using a personal email account during her tenure as secretary of state, arguing that it compromised classified information. Trump, after campaigning as a champion of forgotten blue collar voters in the Rust Belt, is also stocking his administration with millionaires and billionaires.

Why would you or anyone else read such a obviously slanted rag piece? "Raging tweets" an claiming Hillary has no interest an nothing to do with this...

Glad I am not so gullible.
 
Why would you or anyone else read such a obviously slanted rag piece? "Raging tweets" an claiming Hillary has no interest an nothing to do with this...

Glad I am not so gullible.

Some of them are raging.
 
alright, kiddies.

We have almost every elected official exchanging considerations.... "quos" in this discussion...... for campaign funds. Once elected, almost every piece of legislation has nice little things loaded in for the "interests", plus a load of slush for the pushers we "elected". It's pretty hard for a nobody to break into the racket because of little public attention or too little name recognition.

For a loser in this election to start off making hay about the winning side, after years of ignoring the whole issue, just bothers me at some deeper level.

I have recognized that Trump is one of the "elites" or influential all along. He tried to get CFR support from the beginning. He has donated to many elected politicians himself, and not for no good reason. He treated the Clintons, even Jesse Jackson, as friends along his way.

I have recognized that Trump used rough tactics on people I thought well of, such as Ted Cruz, whom my wife and daughters took a day of their lives to go see, and got to shake his hand. I know Ted Cruz had his dirty laundry somewhere, as in a wife who worked for Goldman/Sachs, stuff like that. I didn't think he could organize a program for his administration that would be totally unsmudged, but I like the idea of respecting the written Constitution as it stands until we can fix something about it in the constitutional way.

I deplored Mitt for not supporting Trump and suspected him of fronting Evan McMullin by using influence to get him on the radar, media-wise.

I see that Trump is not a man of principle exactly, and that he will "do business" to get things done.

Most of the active folks in JF forum are hard pushers for the discredited "progressive" line which is exactly what so many folks in America are rejecting in turning out to vote for Trump. I expect they'll be disappointed about a lot downstream, but imo Hillary would have been ten times worse anything you claim of Trump, or that Trump will do.

I'm in favor of holding Trump accountable to the ordinary folks, and keeping him honest just as much as I favor such notions in regard to others.

I'm not in a position to know the exact payola or quids that may go his way, but I want to see that what he does reflects the interests of working, loyal Americans. I really don't give a ratzAzz about anyone who won't work for a living, or for crybabies. It's not the governments' place to create socialist conditions for humans.

Pretty weak stuff in this thread about Steve Bannon. He's no hater.
 
Back
Top