The “I’m a Mike Conley hating bitch” list

[Archie Moses]

Going back and reading the grammatical errors in my posts make me shake my head. Gawd damn it. Trust me, I'm not great at spelling (thank gawd for Google and spellchecked browsers) but the amount of times I type wrong words when I think I'm writing a different word is amusing. I usually catch and edit them during a read through, but gawd damn, I hate this about me. Lol

 

[phippsj]

Conley will be why we hoped he would by the end of the year. So glad fans are not the GMs. I fully expected growing pains as the systems and personnel are very different. It’s going to take time, and I’m happy to watch the process unfold.

 

[Archie Moses]

You stated that Mitchell was unathletic and that the Jazz should trade Gobert.

Have fun spinning these truths.

1) I said he looked unathletic during his first 5 or 10 games (can't remember.)

2) I never argued the Jazz should trade Gobert. I argued he WASN'T un-tradable with the likes of A Davis or different packages in mind. I also said this during a time (the start of the season) where the Jazz couldn't score.

I know to people like you this seems like "spinning" the truth. To me, it's called speaking the truth and reading comprehension.

This is where you respond with an angry response that somehow involves Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ.

 

[NUMBERICA]

1) I said he looked unathletic during his first 5 or 10 games (can't remember.)

2) I never argued the Jazz should trade Gobert. I argued he WASN'T un-tradable with the likes of A Davis or different packages in mind. I also said this during a time (the start of the season) where the Jazz couldn't score.

I know to people like you this seems like "spinning" the truth. To me, it's called speaking the truth and reading comprehension.

This is where you respond with an angry response that somehow involves Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ.

You were actively presenting Gobert trade proposals, and you were wrong on Mitchell to a comedic degree.

Keep on spinnin’, homie.

 

[Archie Moses]

Conley will be why we hoped he would by the end of the year. So glad fans are not the GMs. I fully expected growing pains as the systems and personnel are very different. It’s going to take time, and I’m happy to watch the process unfold.

I hope so, brother.

I think it's a sheepleton thing to say that this is why fans aren't GMs based off of the fact that GMs strike out so much and get fired.

GMs aren't savants. You might think they are, but they **** up so many times it's cringeworthy.

*see the Jazz's draft history*


That said, I'm not a "GM."

 

[Archie Moses]

You were actively presenting Gobert trade proposals, and you were wrong on Mitchell to a comedic degree.

Keep on spinnin’, homie.

I actively said he wasn't Gobert wasn't untradable while mentioning the likes of Anthony Davis. I was saying this during a stretch where they had their worst offense in history and had no spacing with Favors and Gobert.

I've always been a fan of Gobert but I stood up for the dude that made the thread about trading him. I never advocated for the Jazz to trade him I said he wasn't untradable. He wasn't.


Ok, I was so wrong on Mitchell. He looked like a superstar during his first 5 to 10 games (I can't remember exactly) when he set the record for sucking ***.

Trust me, I'm a huge Mitchell fan. He sucked during his start of his NBA career. It wasn't a universal statement or prediction. If you can't discern my my comments from the likes of I was saying he was a bust and would always suck, it's on you, dude.

 

[Archie Moses]

You were actively presenting Gobert trade proposals, and you were wrong on Mitchell to a comedic degree.

Keep on spinnin’, homie.

Btw, I presented, from what I remember, two different trades (only when guys like you said he was untradable.)

The two trades I presented were Anthony Davis and Zubac, Kuzma (lol at you cause you **** on this at the time) and Ingram.

I like Gobert. He's a franchise player. He's not, nor has never been untradable imo.

 

[Zombie]

Btw, I presented, from what I remember, two different trades (only when guys like you said he was untradable.)

The two trades I presented were Anthony Davis and Zubac, Kuzma (lol at you cause you **** on this at the time) and Ingram.

I like Gobert. He's a franchise player. He's not, or has never been untradable imo.

That second trade is poo poo.

 

[Archie Moses]

That second trade is poo poo.

In hindsight, but at the time, the Jazz needed spacing and were losing.

Zubac, Kuzma and Ingram, imo for Gobert wouldn't be poo poo. I'd rather have Gobert, but that trade isn't bad and could pay dividends.

 

[Archie Moses]

In hindsight, but at the time, the Jazz needed spacing and were losing.

Zubac, Kuzma and Ingram, imo for Gobert wouldn't be poo poo. I'd rather have Gobert, but that trade isn't bad and could pay dividends.

I 100% expect members on here to take this personally and translate this to I'm advocating trading Gobert and he sucks.


Gawd damn it. Message boards. Love 'em.

 

[Zombie]

In hindsight, but at the time, the Jazz needed spacing and were losing.

Zubac, Kuzma and Ingram, imo for Gobert wouldn't be poo poo. I'd rather have Gobert, but that trade isn't bad and could pay dividends.

Nah dawg, it's poo poo. If you're trading away a player who impacts the game like Gobert, and you need the trade to pay immediate dividends, you'd better be trading him for an equally impactful player.

 

[carolinajazz]

The fact is Gobert when teamed with Favors and Rubio, set ALL time records for most dunks personally and in a season! The Jazz offense was humming like a well oiled machine during the last quarter of the season and there was no indication that it could be stopped if we could have hit more 3 pointers or traded this year for a couple guys who could! Mitchell was a contributor but needed more experience in fundamental basketball to take his game to the next level, which he may very well do this year!
The front office decided to go in another direction so they picked up Conley to replace Rubio and then added that hot shot shooter from Indiana which has certainly turned out very well. All I'm saying is that with the demise of GS, the trade by Houston to try and play Haden together with Westbrook, the Jazz even by standing pat would have won another 50-55 games and been even tougher to beat in the West. The Lakers are NOT unbeatable and we would give them all they could want in a 7 game series, too! If Conley pans out we could be even better than last year with our improved shooting. Time will tell.

 

[LogGrad98]

Every time I type, I hope it comes across as if I'm in a lifted truck and revving the engine. I'm one if those motorcycle guys that shows how big my balls are by making my crotch rocket go really loud.

Except, that's what you have envisioned, but you're wrong on this.

It's not that I'm so tough or daring, it's that you're too weak to hear criticism for the highest paid Jazz player of all time that's played, barely, like a back up.

Look, dude. I'm 100% a Jazz fan. Conley hasn't played how he should have. If this hurts your feelings, it doesn't mean I'm tough and spewing atrocities. It means you're a gawd damn buttercup.

I like Conley, but he's been a disappointment up to this point. I'm so hard and tough for saying this. The national, local, and ESPN media must be hard asses as well cause the say it too.


I'd love for Conley to play at the level we expected, but until then, as the long remembered words from @TroutBum would have you know, cry harder.


5 months of hard lifting, pudgy couch potato.

Get swole?

 

[Archie Moses]

Get swole?

The only thing that gets swole in my life any more is my joints.


5 months of hard rehab.

 

[freakazoid]

Mitchell sucked *** his first 5 to 10 games. If you're to weak to understand that criticism from what we saw about Mitchell (he literally has the record for poorest shooting percentage to start a career as a lottery pick.)

I never made a conclusion that he would suck or anyone would. If you read my post, you'll see I make fun of fans for thinking they're forecasters, weathermen, and soothsayers. GMs have a hard enough time doing it, let alone fans.

If a Jazz player plays bad. I'm gonna say it. During Mitchell's rookie year, I assure you, I pimped him harder than any Jazz player on Jazzfanz during summer ball.

He just sucked to start his NBA career. 100% understandable. Was asked too much of him. He still sucked to the degree that he holds an NBA record.

Do you argue that assessment?

You are the biggest dumb frack on this site. Do you argue this assessment?

 

[Archie Moses]

You are the biggest dumb frack on this site. Do you argue this assessment?

No.

 

[Archie Moses]

You are the biggest dumb frack on this site. Do you argue this assessment?

Ok

 

[phippsj]

I hope so, brother.

I think it's a sheepleton thing to say that this is why fans aren't GMs based off of the fact that GMs strike out so much and get fired.

GMs aren't savants. You might think they are, but they **** up so many times it's cringeworthy.

*see the Jazz's draft history*


That said, I'm not a "GM."

GMs have decision making tools and insights fans don’t have. They also see the full financial picture. Is what it is. Nothing is 100%, but I would say GMs at quality franchises generally do a good job.

 

[Archie Moses]

GMs have decision making tools and insights fans don’t have. They also see the full financial picture. Is what it is. Nothing is 100%, but I would say GMs at quality franchises generally do a good job.

I'm certainly not saying fans know better than GMs, but I 100% think the of GMs majority strike out.

Lol

Dyslexia

 

[Gameface]

I'm certainly not saying fans know better than GMs, but I 100% think the of GMs majority strike out.

Lol

Dyslexia

Are you legit dyslexic? People say it all the time when they aren't. My wife is actually dyslexic. She's smart as ****, smarter than me 9 out of 10 ways, but reading is not an avenue of discovery for her.

Dyslexia is not what most people think. It isn't seeing things, letters or numbers, all mixed up, even though that's the way it sort of presents itself. There are three parts our brain uses to semi-automatically decode written language. Dyslexics lack one of those three parts and so the whole system of seamless automatic decoding breaks down and they can't just glance at a word and know what that word is. They have to specifically look at every letter, and keep track and then retroactively put the letters together and figure out what word they just read. It's like if a normal person was reading a book written in binary. Most people read essentially a sentence at a time, glancing at words, not looking at every letter, and using their automatic written language decoding skills to fill in the gaps. That's why that funny "how many 'T' letters did you count in this paragraph" is so hard for non-dyslexics. We're not looking at every letter. It is an automatic process of identifying words without actually reading every word. That's how ****ing amazing most humans are at language. Dyslexics can't do that. They lack one of the fundamental automatic processes in the brain for decoding language, so they have to look at every ****ing letter, every ****ing time. They often lose track and have to look at every letter again. That's where the whole "mixing up letters" or "reversing letters" or "seeing things backwards" comes into the myths about dyslexia. They aren't seeing things backwards, they are having to keep an exact track of each letter in every word and then figuring out the word after they've read it, for every word, every time. For a dyslexic to read takes many times the brain power that most of us use when we read.