What's new
By:

The answer to the question that EVERYBODY has been asking me!

BOX said:
Hmmm.... records mean jack....ok you are bordeing on the line of insanity.
Click to expand...

In this comparison it means jack. Do I have to spell everything out for you Boozer haters?

BOX said:
Should also add that on the jazz forum we dont give a rats *** either.
Click to expand...

In your ideal Jazz message board, everyone would agree with each other all the time! That would be so fun.

NUMBERICA said:
Your response is obnoxious
Click to expand...

You know it's my style, cupcake.
 
VINYLONE said:
Does the team record currently say otherwise?
Click to expand...

Tough thing with this question is that we don't know. Becaue you have to compare Boozer and Jefferson ceteris paribus, and cannot simply say that because his new team is better/worse that means Boozer on the Jazz would automatically be better/worse. What you have to ask is, if Boozer were still here instead of Jefferson, with all the other players exactly the same as they are now, would we be better than having Jefferson here now. Obviously Sloanfeld thinks we would be better with Boozer.

Personally I am not so sure. Would Boozer's better rebounding and scoring be more important than Jefferson's better defense? Also, Boozer made it clear he did not really want to be here, and what effect would that have on our chemistry, playing with someone you know doesn't want to be playing alongside you?

I think in the long run we are better with Jefferson, if nothing else than for the reason that we already knew what we had with Boozer. What we will have with Jefferson is yet to be determined. Remember when Boozer first got real PT with us, after missing so so so many games early on, he was not automatically a 20 and 10 guy. He had to learn it to. A better comparison is how does Boozer compare to Jefferson at similar points in their careers with the Jazz. That would be interesting to see.

But not interesting enough for me to look it up.
 
Jeffersuck had SEVEN blocks two games ago. Boozer, in 14 games, has FIVE.

I also wanted to point to this awesome stat line from the Christmas day game: 26 points, 19 rebounds -- NICE -- wait, he had to take 25 shots to get to 26 points? Wait, he had 7 turnover's? Only 1 assist? That's right, he took 25 shots and only assisted one time. Only got to the line 3 times? Impressive for a PF.

Boy, he's awesome.
 
TroutBum said:
Jeffersuck had SEVEN blocks two games ago. Boozer, in 14 games, has FIVE.

I also wanted to point to this awesome stat line from the Christmas day game: 26 points, 19 rebounds -- NICE -- wait, he had to take 25 shots to get to 26 points? Wait, he had 7 turnover's? Only 1 assist? That's right, he took 25 shots and only assisted one time. Only got to the line 3 times? Impressive for a PF.

Boy, he's awesome.
Click to expand...

And he should have had three more points, but the refs took away what should have been an AND ONE and called an offensive foul. The Knicks player was clearly inside of the circle. One assist in one game? So what, he's a power forward, assists are mainly for PG's and SF's. Rebounds are for PF's. Duh.

And blocks are quickly becoming one of the most overrated stats on this board. It's like, "OMG JEFFERSON HAD SEVEN BLOCKS...MVP!!!! Yeah he can block better than Carlos, Boozer does most everything else better.
 
Sloanfeld said:
And he should have had three more points, but the refs took away what should have been an AND ONE and called an offensive foul. The Knicks player was clearly inside of the circle. One assist in one game? So what, he's a power forward, assists are mainly for PG's and SF's. Rebounds are for PF's. Duh.

And blocks are quickly becoming one of the most overrated stats on this board. It's like, "OMG JEFFERSON HAD SEVEN BLOCKS...MVP!!!! Yeah he can block better than Carlos, Boozer does most everything else better.
Click to expand...

Nice, blaming the refs as a last resort. Typical loser mentality and nothing less than what is expected from you.
 
Sloanfeld said:
I don't know what you are talking about. From what I've read, he did want to be here. It was KOC in June 2009 who said to him that the team was looking to go in another direction.
Click to expand...

First, not sure if this is an attempt at sarcasm, but I am going for the you are really serious about this angle. And I am in the mood for ranting anyway. So bear with me. :)

---------------------

Here is Boozer's exact quote from ESPN:

"I'm opting out. No matter what, I'm going to get a raise regardless," Boozer told ESPN.com. "I am going to opt out, I don't see why I wouldn't, I think it's a very good business decision for me and my family, but I'd also like to see what happens with the Jazz and stay here."

I do like that he threw in the "like to see what happens with the Jazz" crap at the end. It is not exactly a huge confidence builder on your team when one of your star players says in the middle of the year that he is opting out.

Interesting thing is, if he really wanted to stay with Utah all he had to do was NOT OPT OUT. He throws away the $12.6 mill he could earn by SIMPLY AGREEING TO STAY WITH THE JAZZ and instead states unequivocally that he is opting out...a mere oh 9 months before he can.

Opting out means it is his choice and his choice alone to run the risk of leaving. If he seriously thought KOC was going to jump for joy and his opting out and offer him a much larger contract than he already had guaranteed then he was not thinking about the "business decision" he forced the Jazz into by opting out. If he wanted to stay here he would have lobbied for an extension, and thereby a raise, from the Jazz. Instead "I am opting out".

NOT opting out means he stays, guaranteed. Yeah sounds like he sure wants to be here and it is all KOC's fault. Give me a break.
 
Last edited:
Well he felt that he had earned a raise from the Jazz, that's why he said it. The comment was a little cocky, but I have no problem with it. Obviously the front office didn't feel that he was worth more than what Chicago did.
 
TroutBum said:
Nice, blaming the refs as a last resort. Typical loser mentality and nothing less than what is expected from you.
Click to expand...

I blamed the refs for one play. They clearly showed it on replay and the broadcasters agreed that it was a bad call. I guess you didn't watch the game. I don't care though, just making a point. I wanted the Kincks to win.

All this Boozer hate, coming from the guy who loves AK.
 
The answer to the question "everyone asks you" is

"Yes I am an absolute moron. Thanks for asking"

another suitable answer is

"No, I did not graduate from middle school."

one more

"Yes, my life is the epitome of epic-fail."
 
Sloanfeld said:
Well he felt that he had earned a raise from the Jazz, that's why he said it. The comment was a little cocky, but I have no problem with it. Obviously the front office didn't feel that he was worth more than what Chicago did.
Click to expand...

I was laughing my *** off reading your posts... up until this pathetic burp. Any pure "business decision" Boozer would have made would require him to stay in Utah, without all the moving expenses, and with the largest raise possible. He didn't get the maximum contract from the Bulls, regardless sweetie. It wasn't about business.
 
LunaticWolf said:
Honestly, he is trolling no less than the Boozer haters.

He has a good point too.
Click to expand...

hahahahahahaha This from the guy that was going to keep game to game stats last year to prove Loozer was an above average defender. TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Funny
 
The-Joker said:
The answer to the question "everyone asks you" is

"Yes I am an absolute moron. Thanks for asking"

another suitable answer is

"No, I did not graduate from middle school."

one more

"Yes, my life is the epitome of epic-fail."
Click to expand...

THIS! A hundred times over you Loozer Lover.
 
VINYLONE said:
Sloany, did you just compare Bozzer to Stockton. Dude, you know I love ya man, but get the **** out of here. Please.

I think these people will love you.

Furthermore, this ain't Tennis son. Individual stats don't matter. Team wins do. Currently the Jazz have a better record than the Bulls.

Once the Jazz implode and the Bulls pass 'em up, you can gloat all you want.
Click to expand...


I blame Vinyl for completely jinxing this jazz team. Still, bulls success isnt due to bozz
 
Hey Sloandude, which comment below would be considered reverse trolling?

Stop making these dumb threads, they add no value to this board.

I know you are talking about Boozer here.... but Jimmer rocks.

TIA for the answer.

Oh, I almost forgot... yes it is vinyl's fault the jazz have imploded.
Vinyl, please use your Ouiji board to ruin some other team... preferrably the Nets.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top