UGLI baby
Well-Known Member
I have a new goal.
Reverse Cousins a GD thread until it gets moved from GD to the Jazz Forum.
The Debates
- Thread starter PearlWatson
- Start date
I have a new goal.
Reverse Cousins a GD thread until it gets moved from GD to the Jazz Forum.
Yeah I think the Jazz will do well this year as well UGLI.
PearlWatson
Well-Known Member
Ann debate tweets were good:
Obama busy taking assault weapons out of the hands of people guarding embassies.
That's the sound of Obama relieved they stopped talking about fast and furious.
Obama pledges to hire OJ to help look for the real killers in Libya.
Hillary just took full responsibility for Obamas debate performance tonight.
Obama busy taking assault weapons out of the hands of people guarding embassies.
That's the sound of Obama relieved they stopped talking about fast and furious.
Obama pledges to hire OJ to help look for the real killers in Libya.
Hillary just took full responsibility for Obamas debate performance tonight.
Take a thread with 1-2 pages of the topic and follow it up with 7+ pages of Jazz talk and I'll do it.
Voting booth in a few weeks. Vote out all tea party, and anyone on the left who you feel won't work with the right.
Lol, I live in southern Utah. There isn't anyone on the "left".
Funny how you are fixating on the messenger rather than the message.
Excrement floats too...
Gyp Rosetti
Banned
One of the differences for me between Romney and other Repubs who have won the Presidency over the last 30+ years is that he's not very likeable. Reagan, both Bush's, they were likeable. Even as dumb as W was, he was likeable in some ways. All three were the type of guy you'd want to have a beer with. Romney? Not even close.
Not that it should matter. I think it could make a difference though. In short, he's just not easy to relate to. And that could make all the difference. Again, not that it should.
Not that it should matter. I think it could make a difference though. In short, he's just not easy to relate to. And that could make all the difference. Again, not that it should.
Any word on Favors' status for tonight?
UGLI baby
Well-Known Member
Yes! I can do this.
The Thriller
Well-Known Member
Sooooooo true
I laughed so hard when I read this from the SL Tribune.
If any of you have read anything on facebook during or after the debates you know exactly what Bagley is talking about.
I laughed so hard when I read this from the SL Tribune.
If any of you have read anything on facebook during or after the debates you know exactly what Bagley is talking about.
UGLI baby
Well-Known Member
I haven't heard anything. Isn't it a game time decision thing?
Well it's almost game time, now isn't it?
Sooooooo true
I laughed so hard when I read this from the SL Tribune.
If any of you have read anything on facebook during or after the debates you know exactly what Bagley is talking about.
That's funny. But in all honesty, I'm not sure how anyone would think that the moderator didn't overstep her bounds.
Is it your position that the moderator should never ever intervene regardless of what the candidates say?
I'm not sure I agree with that. I think that's a recipe for false balance.
Unless they become vulgar, violent or something else the moderator needs to restrain themselves. Checking them on policy is pretty dumb.
Especially when they later say that the candidate was right.
I don't think she did correct him on policy. She corrected him on a "who said what" issue.
For example, do you think the moderator has an obligation to correct the record if Obama were to say "Mitt Romney said on national television yesterday that all black people are heathens who should be put to death." Should the moderator stay silent in that situation?
Yes. Mitt Romney can stand up for himself.