What's new

The future is bright for the utah jazz!

Why all the love for Harris? He can't play pg in the jazz system. So if we groom Irving under Harris e isn't going to learn how to play properly in Utah. Memo is done. The only reason I want memo around is because his wife is so hot. Mmmmm Eye candy.

Well, none of us know what the new Jazz system is going to look like yet, so that statement may be a bit off. Harris is skilled PG. He once was considered an All-Star. The guy can ball, and the guy can help us win games.
 
Why all the love for Harris? He can't play pg in the jazz system. So if we groom Irving under Harris e isn't going to learn how to play properly in Utah. Memo is done. The only reason I want memo around is because his wife is so hot. Mmmmm Eye candy.

Jazz system? What is that exactly? Is it a law, a mandate to play only in one certain way? There is no "Jazz system". There was a Sloan system but he is gone now.

What the Jazz need to develop is the Corbin-Favors-Hayward+1 system and discard any old concepts. The old concepts never got the team to the promised land anyway.
 
it's not like i dislike harris, but he's 28 and it'd be cool to draft a young stud pg to be groomed. I also agree to not take minutes from Favors. I don't think I ever said Memo would take his minutes, though did I? Even if Memo can give 15-20 minutes a night and open things up (like I said) for Paul, Al, AND DERRICK)

I agree the wings should be a focus, too. So if we keep both picks, do we go after a combo guard like Knight or Jimmer or do we look at a Jan Vesely (taller version of AK will a jump shot) and maybe a Jordan Hamilton?

I'm curious as to who you would want to draft?

I know you didn't directly say Memo would take minutes from Favors, but isn't that basically what you're implying? How do you see Memo fitting into the rotation if not? Al is gonna get his 35 minutes, Millsap should get 30 as our sixth man. We need Favors to get atleast 30 minute per game, so I don't see where that leaves Memo. Not to mention it's likely he will never be the same player he was (which wasn't that much to begin with).

As far as the draft, it all depends where we pick. If we get a top 3 pick, I want Derrick Williams or Barnes. If it stays at number 6, it's gonna be tough. I would try hard to trade our 6 and 12 to move into the top 3, or 2 if Barnes doesn't declare. Otherwise, Kanter and Biyombo seem to be the popular choices around here at 6. I wouldn't mind either, and would take either ahead of Kemba and Knight. At 12 if either Kemba or Knight are available, I say we go for one of them, since they will likely be the best players available at that point.
 
Memo is done, Cj needs to be shot, make Millsap are 6th man 20 min. At pf 10 min. at sf, bell needs to become a jazz dancer, his true calling in life start Favors, Play him 35 min. And give him minutes at the c spot behind Al, Memo doesn't need to play anymore he has a hot wife he will be just fine. Let Hayward blossom into the star he will become, and run the offense through him as are playmaker allowing us to take advantage of Harris strength on offense. Ty needs to discover is own philosophy as a coach.
 
Joe, that's what I have just heard. If he is really 19, he is incredible and is extremely physically gifted. His potential would be much higher if he is truly 19. I would still take him if he is older though.
 
Well, none of us know what the new Jazz system is going to look like yet, so that statement may be a bit off. Harris is skilled PG. He once was considered an All-Star. The guy can ball, and the guy can help us win games.
Correct. Harris is a scoring PG. Isn't that what we had in Deron? I'm not saying Harris is a top-5 PG; he's not. But Devin is actually a better finisher on his drives than Williams was. And give the guy a shot at learning the offense (in whatever form it takes). He was a mid-year addition, playing with a bunch of guys who were as equally lost. I can see a solid offense forming with Harris driving and looking for Jefferson, Favors or throwing it back out to Hayward. Devin played pretty well after returning from his injury.

Yes, the Jazz will eventually need to replace him. But I don't think that's an immediate need. Draft strategy can - and should - be to take the BPA. Utah can use the depth anywhere and then look to trade if/when players develop.

And I agree with zman. Corbin needs to develop a system that will rely more on Hayward and Favors. Those 2 guys can be absolutelly dominant at their positions. It might take another 1-2 years for them to develop consistency, but it's gonna be fun to watch them become stars.
 
My dream line up for next year:

PG: Harris/Jimmer
SG: Hayword/Miles or Alec Burks
SF: Milsap/Evans
PF: Favors/AK
C: Jefferson/Tomic

First team play mainly man to man and execute old school Jazz offense. Pound it down low.
Second team play mainly zone and run as much as possible. They are long, athletic, & quick. Also, with the zone it will hide any sort comings from Jimmer's D. I also think the zone is effective in spurts as not that many teams in the NBA play it.
 
My dream line up for next year:

PG: Harris/Jimmer
SG: Hayword/Miles or Alec Burks
SF: Milsap/Evans
PF: Favors/AK
C: Jefferson/Tomic

First team play mainly man to man and execute old school Jazz offense. Pound it down low.
Second team play mainly zone and run as much as possible. They are long, athletic, & quick. Also, with the zone it will hide any sort comings from Jimmer's D. I also think the zone is effective in spurts as not that many teams in the NBA play it.

So our team as presently constituted is your dream lineup?
 
I don't smoke weed... I am realistic. I didn't know Jimmer, Alec Burks, & Tomic were on the team. There is enough talent on this team with a these three additions to be very good. Jimmer will be very good NBA player.
 
But if we are in position to add a elite PG, we take it, right? I'd rather have a top 5 PG then a top 20 SG.

The idea of the new no-elite PG ideology is just that. No. To. Them.

So, given the choice of picking Deron Williams or Chris Paul at 3 in 2005, the Jazz shoulda gone for Martell Webster. Ergo, no problem with comments like "That's why I just signed for 3 years" or "Here's to Amare, Melo and me forming our own Big 3 haha".

Or Derrick Rose who, man, in 2008. You go with the pick 2 guy, Beastly Beasley, or the 3 guy, Mayo ace.

Avoid them elite PGs. They never win championships. Travel back in time to swap Stockton for Pippen to help the Mailman. New no elite PG policy to be implemented in the draft and in future trades and signings.
 
I don't smoke weed... I am realistic. I didn't know Jimmer, Alec Burks, & Tomic were on the team. There is enough talent on this team with a these three additions to be very good. Jimmer will be very good NBA player.

So three rookies off the bench are going to swing us from ****** to very good? Sounds about right.
 
Correct. Harris is a scoring PG. Isn't that what we had in Deron? I'm not saying Harris is a top-5 PG; he's not. But Devin is actually a better finisher on his drives than Williams was. ...

If this is true, maybe coach should consider running the offense through Hayward and others more , and letting Harris be a primary scorer.
 
Checked the stats, Harris and CJ both have to improve their shooting percentages for them to be considered quality starters, IMO.
Maybe having an offense with everyone getting more involved in the playmaking would help Harris do that.
 
The idea of the new no-elite PG ideology is just that. No. To. Them.
I don't think that's the philosophy per se. Start McLeod or Palacio on the Lakers or Spurs and those two teams wouldn't have won their titles. You need to have a quality PG to win. I also think the team can make or break a PG. Devin Harris on the Mavs...all-star. On the Nets...2nd tier player. Fisher on the Lakers (well, except for this year)...pretty good PG. On any other team...end of bench.
 
I like Harris a lot. However, if we get Irving I think we should shop Harris and get a good piece and/or draft picks in return.

What would it take to get Westbrook? HOLY ****, he is ****ing awesome. He is so quick and can jump out of the gym and his intensity is unreal. It's unfair Ibaka, Westbrook and Durant are all on the same team (All elite athletes). They won't give up Westbrook but I would give up Millsap, Harris and the 12 pick for him
 
Joe, that's what I have just heard. If he is really 19, he is incredible and is extremely physically gifted. His potential would be much higher if he is truly 19. I would still take him if he is older though.

He's 19. Not only does he have a birth certificate and a youth history to prove it, but he's submitted to bone tests that verify that his age is as advertised. There is no legitimacy whatsoever to the rumor that he's older. If he weren't from Africa no one would have ever made this story up.
 
Back
Top