Look, I understand the LeBron hatred - but "everything good about basketball"? The Mavericks have a 90 million dollar payroll and continually operate at a loss because of a billioinaire who has nothing better to do with his money and is in the process of being sued by his minority owners for running the franchise so carelessly.
No question Dallas benefits from being able to stock the team with depth. They're not a great example of what's right with the NBA system, but the overspending MO has failed more often than it's worked. Everything they did on the floor is what basketball is all about.
I'm just glad the bulls didn't win.
Tonight is a win for basketball and the culture of the league.
This thread will be moved, but let's let this discussion have front page.
They have supreme talent and play(ed) at the highest level with that talent. I am just agreeing with candrew that the money issue is a real problem with small market teams. Look at the last 4 title teams and look at their payrolls.
Mavs
Lakers
Lakers
Celtics
You got me there in my excitement. Agreed. Cuban is a real mixed bag. Cuban's spending is only slightly less distasteful than arrogant superstars joining up to create an easy dynasty.
I'm agreeing with him, too. Competitive balance has to be addressed in the new CBA. But there's another way to look at that, as well: Cuban is only taking advantage of the system. But unlike other billionaire owners, he'll lose his own money to win.
He's the most likeable billionaire I've ever seen, because I believe I would be the same way. If I had all that money, I would not be worried year to year if my net worth went down from 1.2 billion to .9 billion. I would own the Jazz, of course, and I would treat the Jazz like my toy that I would spend any amount of money on to make it the best toy on earth every single year.
Cuban is an interesting one. On one hand I the guy irritates me because he is so over the top and because I believe he massively bought into his own hype (at least a few years ago), but on the other hand I really respect the guy for the passion he has and the fact that he really seems to care. I wish there were a little more Cuban in Greggie.
Agree, Cuban's approach is defensible because his number-1 goal is to win - and as fans, the best thing you can hope for is an owner who's more commited to winning than the bottom line. I would gladly take Cuban's approach over that of a Donald Sterling who is only looking to make/save as much money as possible.I'm agreeing with him, too. Competitive balance has to be addressed in the new CBA. But there's another way to look at that, as well: Cuban is only taking advantage of the system. But unlike other billionaire owners, he'll lose his own money to win.
He's the most likeable billionaire I've ever seen, because I believe I would be the same way.
Greggie Boy always appears like he is looking for his next bong hit.
Why do you think Miller cares much less then Cuban?
Agree, Cuban's approach is defensible because his number-1 goal is to win - and as fans, the best thing you can hope for is an owner who's more commited to winning than the bottom line. I would gladly take Cuban's approach over that of a Donald Sterling who is only looking to make/save as much money as possible.
Well I think - like Daniel Snyder and the Redskins - in many respects it was laughable. The difference with this team was Dallas focused more on "role players" (Chandler, Haywood, Marion) rather than the flashy high-scoring types (Antoine Walker, Antwawn Jamison, Raef LaFrentz, Nick Van Exel, Keith Van Horn). They would always go after the biggest FA fish in the pond - even if that guy happened to be Erik Dampier, and it's not like the Devin Harris draft-day trade, or the Kidd trade in '08 paid immediate dividends. Dallas also thought long and hard about acquiring Al Jefferson but decided to pass on the "scorer" instead for the defense/toughness of Haywood. If you're going to make tons of moves - they have to make sense and Dallas gradually figured out how to build a championship team instead of a fantasy team.I remember a few years ago many Jazz fans were laughing at Cuban, how he always tried to bring star players in, making trades, try different coaches. People were pointing to the Jazz, how we have stability, few trades, same coach for decades, and we are better off because of that. Well, Cuban kept trading, kept changing coaches, and after just 11 years he has a title to show for it. This is really an example of having a will and balls to win.
I love your optimism.Miami should slow down enough by the time young Jazz advance to the Finals...
No question Dallas benefits from being able to stock the team with depth. They're not a great example of what's right with the NBA system, but the overspending MO has failed more often than it's worked. Everything they did on the floor is what basketball is all about.