Baseball had the largest percentage of their fan-base over 50 and the smallest percentage under 25, so yeah.
The NBA, Now VS. Then
- Thread starter Safetydan
- Start date
Baseball had the largest percentage of their fan-base over 50 and the smallest percentage under 25, so yeah.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
Yeah but the way I see it they're making room for MLS but not enough room for it to compete with Europe
Maybe if for some reason soccer declined over there but that doesn't seem to be happening
Soccer also benefits from the demographic trend over the next couple of decades. It might eventually make it.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
Maybe as an American I'm overestimating soccer's hold on the rest of the world but I don't think I am. Even if soccer was to become the most popular sport in America to the point it displace the NBA NFL MLB and NHL it seems to me that MLS would still have a hard time competing. The eastern hemisphere in the next 50 years is going to have a huge media advantage. Beyond the current audience as countries develop there's a huge time zone advantage to staging games in front of so many God damn eyeballs. A mid-afternoon game in London is prime time for most of the world. A mid-afternoon game in LA is in the middle of the night for most of the world.
Right now in this moment in time if MLS was as popular as NFL in America then maybe it is the best league in the world but a hell of a lot more than just what is the most popular sport in America is going to happen over the next 50 years. America has been the indispensable Nation for what 60 years? Seriously we kind of live in a weird time but people think it's going to continue forever. Sooner or later the Americas will go back to being the Frontiers on the edge of the world.
Do you ever see college sports falling? Seems like eventually people will smarten up and realize they are exploiting them for insane amounts of money.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
The NCAA now allows a small stipend to be paid to players. I think that probably increases over time.
b_line
Well-Known Member
I think the mid 90's were a golden age of basketball, almost on par with what we are experiencing now. The 80's were probably third best, and the rest is whatever.
The NBA needs expansion teams for the league's popularity. They could handle 4-6 more teams right now, but will probably do Seattle and Mexico City first, then a couple down the road a few years.
The thing that would probably improve the popularity of the league is having some crappier players in the league due to more roster spots. Players will probably team up less of they can be the man on a team. That happens more of there are more teams. Let concentration of talent makes for more popular basketball, even though it's not as good. The good players look a lot better that way.
The NBA needs expansion teams for the league's popularity. They could handle 4-6 more teams right now, but will probably do Seattle and Mexico City first, then a couple down the road a few years.
The thing that would probably improve the popularity of the league is having some crappier players in the league due to more roster spots. Players will probably team up less of they can be the man on a team. That happens more of there are more teams. Let concentration of talent makes for more popular basketball, even though it's not as good. The good players look a lot better that way.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
The NBA doesn't need to expand. 4 divisions would be better so maybe they expand to 32.(honestly 28 would be a better product)
What the NBA needs to do is to sell local tv contracts as a division instead of by individual team. Jazz, Blazers, Nuggets, OKC, Twolves should be a package deal.
