We should definitely take the word of a disgraced prosecutor over the UK government, the IMF and the rest of the our allies in Europe who wanted him out.
In a sworn affidavit? Probably.
We should definitely take the word of a disgraced prosecutor over the UK government, the IMF and the rest of the our allies in Europe who wanted him out.
I'm not going to go back and reread the posts but I twice said that Kavanaugh had been accused of outrageous behavior. He twice told me that if I thought the accusations were outrageous I must be a sheltered little flower or something like that. He said this even after I pointed out the gang rape accusations. I'm not sure whether I worded my response exactly right, but it seems ridiculous to suggest that I am naive because believe that Swetnick's allegations were extreme. IMO the libs keep overplaying their hand in this way. The vast majority of people get sick of it and simply tune them out.There's not really any other way to read that. Maybe you should enlighten me as to what you actually meant.
That same prosecutor filed a sworn affidavit to the contrary this week. Maybe it's being investigated, but I suppose you know better sitting on your couch in Draper.
#zombiesfacts
Lol sure, no one has ever lied under oath amirite?In a sworn affidavit? Probably.
I'm actually only aware of this time. If I felt that way prior, I might have said as much prior. Barr cleverly, slyly, dulled the impact the Mueller Report might have had, so it did not happen then. That's just how I feel about this week of cascading bad news for Trump.
I thought he had taken an oath to protect and defend the constitution. I thought, as the Commander-in-Chief, that it would be strange for the Commander to simply forgive Russia for attacking us. Very strange to tell the Russian ambassador to the US, and the Russian Foreign Minister that Russia's interference in our election did not concern him. Does he know Russia was our chief geopolitical adversary of the past 70 plus years? I should think our Commander-in-Chief would know that, and act appropriately. Does not look like that was the case.
Quite honestly, my opinion that is, I do not think Donald Trump is on our side. And that dam? That's the dam holding back all these revelations that are currently pouring forth. The dam has indeed broke. And I am not aware of this degree of cascading revelations, over such a short time, happening prior. Hence my comment.
And it pleases me, yes indeed, it pleases me. Not that my country should have to go through all this. But pleased that the truth will out. I believe that's what recent events portend, the truth will out. I'm all about that. Truth. It's very important to me. It's the kind of guy I am. My friends find it to be an admirable quality. And I admire those for whom truth is always the goal. We live but once. I prefer to live with honor. I cannot say my president is an honorable man. Pretty sad, really.
Things are coming into sharper focus. His encouragement of Russian interference in 2016 was not a one off. He's a lawless president.
I have my location clearly listed in my bio, so he didn't even get that part right. Par for the course I suppose.Remember that time you said the mainstream media wouldn’t cover a story and @Zombie took a screenshot of 10 different news outlets reporting that story? He seems to know much more sitting on his couch in Draper than you do.
#zombiesfacts
#catchgraspingatstraws
I have my location clearly listed in my bio, so he didn't even get that part right. Par for the course I suppose.
Not sure what your point is. She made all of these claims and more in a sworn affidavit.Prove it! I'm gonna need audio and video evidence of her saying it along with a transcripts and everything must be time and date stamped too.
Oh and I have to be there when it happens!
I will bet you 100 dollars that you can't prove it!
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Lol sure, no one has ever lied under oath amirite?
Anyway the record of Shokins corruption is clear. This article outlines some of them. It got so bad the Ukrainian people were protesting in the streets for his removal. But because he's saying things you like to hear, you find him credible. Checks out tbh.
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...-trumps-boasts-about-former-ukrainian-prosec/
that many are saying originated in Ukraine
just read your bio. You're in Wyoming. Got it. I'll edit my comment to say your couch in Wyoming
Classic Trumpian quote right here.
The fact that the DOJ is "taking it seriously" is itself part of this entire scandal. Not a lot of people around here who have much trust in Barr, and for good reason.
The fact that the DOJ is "taking it seriously" is itself part of this entire scandal. Not a lot of people around here who have much trust in Barr, and for good reason.
It doesn't surprise me that you believe that spreading your misinterpretations of Catchall's arguments somehow strengthens your arguments, but your belief is incorrect.According to @Catchall that means she must be telling the gods honest truth.
Yeah that pretty much sums it up. I mean, I disagree with your characterization of the Mueller probe as false and all that, but uh, yeah that's definitely part of the scandal.So you're saying the Justice Department, including Bill Barr and John Durham, are scandalously fabricating an investigation into the origins of the false Russia-collusion probe and counter-intelligence op in the FBI and CIA, with information being fed from Fusion GPS under contract to the DNC? That's obviously just a sham for you?
The good news is that adults and our legal system make judgements based on real evidence. Dems apparently haven't caught on to that yet.
I guess we'll both have to see where this shakes out.
I mean, it was clear Barr has been working as Trump's de facto legal counsel from the day he drafted his misleading memo about the Mueller report.Exactly. Barr was implicated in an impeachable offense in the whistleblower complaint. Saying that the DOJ is “taking Biden’s alleged corruption in Ukraine seriously” only confirms the corruption of the DOJ stated the whistleblower. I don’t think trumpers are reading this correctly at all. This actually supports impeachment, it doesn’t support Biden’s alleged corruption. The DOJ has become compromised and is now working as yet another arm of the Trump crime syndicate
I mean, it was clear Barr has been working as Trump's de facto legal counsel from the day he drafted his misleading memo about the Mueller report.
Funny that we're expected to trust him of all people.
I was going to edit my post to say that Barr's untrustworthiness actually goes back much further than I said, all the way back to his time as AG under Bush 1 in fact.Yes. Barr is nothing more than a hack. He’s sacrificed whatever integrity and whatever was left of his soul for one last sniff of the throne. He wrote a letter practically begging trump to hire him to save his presidency. He wrote the deceptive memo. And has now clearly been implicated by the whistleblower. The whistleblower’s complaint that has thus far been proven to be dead on. While Barr has been exposed.
So yeah, I trust the whistleblower much more than trump’s corrupt AG. I’m pretty sure most Americans do. Only the desperate trumpers repeating Q’s claims that soon the corrupt deep state will be revealed and massive arrests will ensue. They’re so desperate. Methinks they know deep down inside about trump. But their precious egos won’t let them admit it.
I was going to edit my post that Barr's untrustworthiness actually goes back much further than I said, all the way back to his time as AG under Bush 1 in fact.