Do you think he'll have the energy to keep up with it longer than two weeks?
That orange glow is his nuclear reactor.
Do you think he'll have the energy to keep up with it longer than two weeks?
That orange glow is his nuclear reactor.
"Thrill, remind me again why you advocate voting against all Repubs. You sound so mean and bigoted and mean. Aren't both sides the same?"
Watch Devin Nunes's wacky opening impeachment speech and compare it to Schiff's.
The public impeachment hearings have begun. I expect Trump to lose his **** in the coming days to the point that many people on the fence start turning on him.
Maybe you can see noble motives in things like this, but I cannot.
Not to mention the Ukraine extortion of course.
I can see this. Trump is gonna go on a Sudafed bender and stay up for a week straight texting crazy stuff.
Judging by Donald’s twitter feed, he seems very calm and rational today.
I'm upset enough to vote against Biden in the Democratic primary, but we can't impeach Biden at the moment. If Hunter Biden's ties to the Ukraine affect some position by POTUS Biden, impeach him then.
The report that resulted in multiple convictions, showed Trump's campaign colluded, and that Trump obstructed justice?
The public impeachment hearings have begun. I expect Trump to lose his **** in the coming days to the point that many people on the fence start turning on him.
The Mueller Report come up with nothing. Some of the worst prosecutorial misconduct forced some plea bargains. You're running on fumes now. You've got nothing.
The Flynn case is being turned around and some of the Mueller people are going to go to jail for their heinous criminal misdeeds just in his case. I think Mueller is going to go to jail.
Have we heard from the whistleblower yet?
I think it's pretty damn important to be able to question the person responsible for this entire thing. Especially when they have specific interest and lawyers that have been speaking of overthrowing the government. The whistleblower is direct evidence. The whistleblower IS the evidence. I think it's completely logical thing to ask for.Why does this matter? To my understanding, the whistle blower had the equivalent of hearsay evidence. Isn't direct evidence better? Do you think impeachments should be based on hearsay?
I think it's pretty damn important to be able to question the person responsible for this entire thing. Especially when they have specific interest and lawyers that have been speaking of overthrowing the government. The whistleblower is direct evidence. The whistleblower IS the evidence.
I think it would blow this whole thing open. I think it would show that this is exactly what many think this is, just another stupid attempt to "coup" the President. Just like Russia. We have the script. The witness Taylor today wasn't even part of anything more than hearing something from someone that heard something. What a ****ing waste that was speaking of "hearsay".What knowledge of Trump's behavior can we gain from the whistle blower that we don't already have better sources for? I mean, you make it sound like you want to put the whistle blower on trial. Assuming the best possible result from so doing, what would that mean?