What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

One Brow said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Trudeau

I realize, being a Trumpite, that you don't understand the power of acknowledging error and apologizing. Don't worry, no one expects more of you.
Click to expand...

Here is Trump apologizing for his remarks about grabbing *****. Please refrain from bringing it up again in your continued bashing of our president. He has apologized and is forgiven. You can no longer hold this against him. Thank you for staying consistent in your morals and standards.

"I’ve never said I’m a perfect person, nor pretended to be someone that I’m not. I’ve said and done things I regret, and the words released today on this more-than-a-decade-old video are one of them.

Anyone who knows me knows these words don’t reflect who I am. I said it, I was wrong, and I apologize. I’ve traveled the country talking about change for America, but my travels have also changed me. I’ve spent time with grieving mothers who’ve lost their children, laid-off workers whose jobs have gone to other countries, and people from all walks of life who just want a better future. I have gotten to know the great people of our country, and I’ve been humbled by the faith they’ve placed in me. I pledge to be a better man tomorrow and will never, ever let you down."
 
BabyPeterzz said:
I know, right? Even the dude who wore black face thinks you're a ****ing joke! Usually Trump has racists in the bag! What a loser!
Click to expand...

Or you could look at it like, hey the racists are against Trump. Maybe Trump isnt who we think he is. You know logic and stuff.
 
colton said:
I watched for 4:20 until he said "not compelling evidence of the commission of a crime". I stopped there because he is clearly not very well educated on the evidence. Imho.
Click to expand...

You mean all the testimonies of people's beliefs? There is no evidence of quid pro quo, only opinion of what so and so believed was going on. But nobody is going to convince you otherwise.

Evidence and fact matters in a judicial trial, which if you had listened is what this guy was speaking in regards to. This is a political trial and all the evidence presented is just that, political and baseless.
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
You mean all the testimonies of people's beliefs? There is no evidence of quid pro quo, only opinion of what so and so believed was going on. But nobody is going to convince you otherwise.

Evidence and fact matters in a judicial trial, which if you had listened is what this guy was speaking in regards to. This is a political trial and all the evidence presented is just that, political and baseless.
Click to expand...
That's the great part about this strategy from Trump and the GOP. Complain that we don't have all the facts to impeach while stonewalling every congressional effort to gain access to those facts.
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
I think what you mean is you dont believe you are a party wonk. You are, however, the cheerleader of the partisans. You've been boasting your prejudice for months on end, telling us ad nauseum how you hate Trump and think he's a terrible person. You've hardly said anything else. I thought you were holding that up as some badge of honor?
Click to expand...
Well ya, I hate Trump. And yes he is a horrible person. Of that there's no debate.
Being partisan means following a party. Hope that clears it up for you. Thought you were smarter than that to be honest. Not the first time I have been wrong though. Oh well.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
It's like that old saying from Grandma

This would get you fired.
An unlubricated *** fisting ain't for everyone
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
You mean all the testimonies of people's beliefs? There is no evidence of quid pro quo, only opinion of what so and so believed was going on. But nobody is going to convince you otherwise.

Evidence and fact matters in a judicial trial, which if you had listened is what this guy was speaking in regards to. This is a political trial and all the evidence presented is just that, political and baseless.
Click to expand...
There is tremendous evidence of a quid pro quo. But there doesn't even need to be. Simply ASKING for a foreign government to help a campaign is against the law, even if there isn't a quid pro quo attached. There is also evidence of obstruction of justice and obstruction of Congress. And abuse of power. Etc.
 
colton said:
There is tremendous evidence of a quid pro quo. But there doesn't even need to be. Simply ASKING for a foreign government to help a campaign is against the law, even if there isn't a quid pro quo attached. There is also evidence of obstruction of justice and obstruction of Congress. And abuse of power. Etc.
Click to expand...


Not to mention the abuse of orange makeup. Impeach and remove on that alone.
 
fishonjazz said:
Well ya, I hate Trump. And yes he is a horrible person. Of that there's no debate.
Being partisan means following a party. Hope that clears it up for you. Thought you were smarter than that to be honest. Not the first time I have been wrong though. Oh well.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

Uh, ok.

If you are going to resort to name calling and passive aggressiveness then you might want to use words correctly. I'm not getting sucked into another one of your convoluted semantics troll jobs, so here's a link to settle it for you:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/partisan

I don't see what axe you are trying to grind here anyway. I feel like I walked into the middle of something and dont know what's been going on.
 
colton said:
There is tremendous evidence of a quid pro quo.
Click to expand...

Whose testimony? Sondland's? I don't believe much that he says. The national security beaurocrats who are mad at Trump for getting in the way of what they wanted accomplished? Way too much conjecture from them.

colton said:
But there doesn't even need to be. Simply ASKING for a foreign government to help a campaign is against the law, even if there isn't a quid pro quo attached.
Click to expand...

No it isn't. What law did Trump break?

colton said:
There is also evidence of obstruction of justice and obstruction of Congress. And abuse of power. Etc.
Click to expand...

Let them draft that up in their articles of impeachment and this will go down as Bill Clinton 2.0. Impeachment for his actions during impeachment over the impeachment process, and not impeachment on the grounds of why they set out to impeach. Impeachment is the ends, let's get there regardless right?
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
Let them draft that up in their articles of impeachment and this will go down as Bill Clinton 2.0. Impeachment for his actions during impeachment over the impeachment process, and not impeachment on the grounds of why they set out to impeach. Impeachment is the ends, let's get there regardless right?
Click to expand...

This argument is bogus. Setting aside whether you believe Trump should ultimately be impeached over Ukraine, the impeachment process is explicitly laid out in the constitution for congress to provide oversight over the president. Trump doesn't just get to exempt himself from it, unless your belief is that the president can ignore the constitution when it's convenient for him.

The idea that we shouldn't take presidential misconduct as seriously when it occurs during his impeachment as we do if it occurs outside of it is completely wrong-headed. If anything it should be taken more seriously.
 
Last edited:
idestroyedthetoilet said:
No it isn't. What law did Trump break?
Click to expand...

Multiple credible legal analysts have stated this. I'm willing to look it up if you're willing to say that it will change your mind. So, how about it? If merely asking a foreign government to interfere in an election is a crime, will it change your mind about whether Trump should be impeached? If not I won't waste my time.
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
Uh, ok.

If you are going to resort to name calling and passive aggressiveness then you might want to use words correctly. I'm not getting sucked into another one of your convoluted semantics troll jobs, so here's a link to settle it for you:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/partisan

I don't see what axe you are trying to grind here anyway. I feel like I walked into the middle of something and dont know what's been going on.
Click to expand...

Exactly. So like I said. I'm not partisan. I don't have a firm adherence to a party. I hate trump. That doesn't equal partisan. I hate Ace of Base too that doesn't make me partisan. Hating a particular person has nothing to do with partisanship.

I simply said I'm not partisan and then you suddenly starting grinding some axe or some ****.

In conclusion, I was right and you were wrong. Carry on

Oh and you were also wrong about me resorting to name calling. I actually said I thought you were smart. But then you thought that me hating Trump equalled being partisan, which the definition of partisan you provided proves is incorrect. So you simply weren't as smart as I thought you were. That doesn't equal name calling.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
colton said:
Multiple credible legal analysts have stated this. I'm willing to look it up if you're willing to say that it will change your mind. So, how about it? If merely asking a foreign government to interfere in an election is a crime, will it change your mind about whether Trump should be impeached? If not I won't waste my time.
Click to expand...
You honestly think that Trump is the biggest issue this nation faces when we have Biden leading the opposition and so little voting turnout?
 
Jazzta said:
You honestly think that Trump is the biggest issue this nation faces when we have Biden leading the opposition and so little voting turnout?
Click to expand...
Yes. By a landslide. Trump is a million times worse than biden.

Quick, make a list of things that suck about Biden. I guarantee the list I make about trump will be much much bigger.
Btw, I hope Biden doesn't win the Democratic nomination.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Last edited:
idestroyedthetoilet said:
Whose testimony? Sondland's? I don't believe much that he says. The national security beaurocrats who are mad at Trump for getting in the way of what they wanted accomplished? Way too much conjecture from them.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure we've been over this before. But if someone won't open his eyes you can't prove to him that the sky is blue.
 
fishonjazz said:
Yes. By a landslide. Trump is a million times worse than biden.

Quick, make a list of things that suck about Biden. I guarantee the list I make about trump will be much much bigger.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
He’s a slouchy old angry man, with signs of age affecting his speech. In bed with the Ukranian mafia. Groper. Hypocrite. Antiamerican. A snake who’s sole purpose is to steer the debate in one direction, that of containing those who advocate for moving the Democratic party away from pharmaceutical companies and military industrial interests. He has no business being on that stage and I repudiate him every time he opens his foul mouth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top