LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
Here it is, the final round.
WE NEED YOUR VOTES!! THIS POLL WILL STAY OPEN UNTIL THIS COMING WEEKEND, TO GET AS MANY VOTES AS POSSIBLE. GET YOUR FRIENDS AND YOUR ALTS AND YOUR ENEMIES AND YOUR FRENEMIES (LOOKING AT YOU @LoPo AND @Saint Cy of JFC ) TO VOTE!!! LET'S GET TO 100 VOTERS JAZZFANZ!!!!
@Jason OR SOME OTHER MOD PLEASE STICKY!!!
Here are the final round participants, in alphabetical order. By definition, these are the top 20 Jazz players of all time!:

Here are some observations from the second round of voting.
First, 2 people improved their position from the first round of voting to the 2nd round. Here they are, with their position in the first round vs the second round (note this not their number of votes, but rather where they ranked after the voting in each round):
Jeff Malone (#26 - #18)
Truck Robinson (#27 - #20)
To go along with that, there were several who placed higher in Impact Score who fell out of the top 20 in the 2nd round vote. Here they are with their impact score and their 2nd round voting ranking (out of 30):
Al Jefferson (28.7 - #23)
Bojan Bogdanovic (21.4 - #27)
Donyell Marshall (20.8 - #29)
Mike Conley (20.7 - $24)
Jordan Clarkson (20.2 - #22)
They were replaced by these guys, who all had lower impact scores, but higher ranking in the 2nd round voting:
Thurl Bailey (18.8 - #19)
Paul Millsap (18.5 - #13)
Derrick Favors (17.9 - #14)
Mark Eaton (13.9 - #8)
Joe Ingles (13.2 - #16)
So the nostalgia effect is strong here. But of course a player is not just his stats on the court, there are many reasons why we would pick one player over another, including longevity and impact on culture, among others. Largely I agree with the swaps. I am sure most others do too since the voting proved that out.
Lastly, here is the full group that got eliminated in the final round, followed by the entire ranking of the 2nd round of voting:

This is the complete list for the 2nd round rankings, in 2nd round rank order. Sorry if it is kind of small, but I didn't like the table format on the last poll:

WE NEED YOUR VOTES!! THIS POLL WILL STAY OPEN UNTIL THIS COMING WEEKEND, TO GET AS MANY VOTES AS POSSIBLE. GET YOUR FRIENDS AND YOUR ALTS AND YOUR ENEMIES AND YOUR FRENEMIES (LOOKING AT YOU @LoPo AND @Saint Cy of JFC ) TO VOTE!!! LET'S GET TO 100 VOTERS JAZZFANZ!!!!
@Jason OR SOME OTHER MOD PLEASE STICKY!!!
Here are the final round participants, in alphabetical order. By definition, these are the top 20 Jazz players of all time!:

Here are some observations from the second round of voting.
First, 2 people improved their position from the first round of voting to the 2nd round. Here they are, with their position in the first round vs the second round (note this not their number of votes, but rather where they ranked after the voting in each round):
Jeff Malone (#26 - #18)
Truck Robinson (#27 - #20)
To go along with that, there were several who placed higher in Impact Score who fell out of the top 20 in the 2nd round vote. Here they are with their impact score and their 2nd round voting ranking (out of 30):
Al Jefferson (28.7 - #23)
Bojan Bogdanovic (21.4 - #27)
Donyell Marshall (20.8 - #29)
Mike Conley (20.7 - $24)
Jordan Clarkson (20.2 - #22)
They were replaced by these guys, who all had lower impact scores, but higher ranking in the 2nd round voting:
Thurl Bailey (18.8 - #19)
Paul Millsap (18.5 - #13)
Derrick Favors (17.9 - #14)
Mark Eaton (13.9 - #8)
Joe Ingles (13.2 - #16)
So the nostalgia effect is strong here. But of course a player is not just his stats on the court, there are many reasons why we would pick one player over another, including longevity and impact on culture, among others. Largely I agree with the swaps. I am sure most others do too since the voting proved that out.
Lastly, here is the full group that got eliminated in the final round, followed by the entire ranking of the 2nd round of voting:

This is the complete list for the 2nd round rankings, in 2nd round rank order. Sorry if it is kind of small, but I didn't like the table format on the last poll:
