What's new
By:

Trade deadline discussion

The real reports are that Grant he has provided Detroit with a list of teams, but his reported criteria is getting PAID. I’ve not actually seen a list of teams.

So…not Utah.
 
I am not good at coming up with trades but this looks feasible.

Jazz trade: Clarkson, Dok, 2nd rounder
Jazz get: Covington

Dallas trade: Reggie Bullock, 2nd rounder
Dallas get: Clarkson

Portland trade: Covington
Portland get: Bullock, Dok and 2 2nd rounders

Jazz get an impactful defender and get size hoping Ingles, Royce, Covington have enough length to shrink the floor.

Dallas needs someone to score when Luka sits. Hardaway, their best bench scorer missing time creates some urgency but even if he comes back this season it means they have more freedom to play him with Luka.

Portland save save money this season, get some value on an expiring. They may exchange Dok with Hughes to save more money. They hope to recuperate Bullock.
 
Hoopshype saying Barnes is on Jazz radar ..

Another good fit …

Started the season well for kings , but has dropped off since coach change and kings play in general nose dived .
 
jazfan23 said:
Hoopshype saying Barnes is on Jazz radar ..

Another good fit …

Started the season well for kings , but has dropped off since coach change and kings play in general nose dived .
Click to expand...
I could see him being a decent fit and upgrade over Royce in the starting lineup. Overall, I wouldn't be thrilled by that deal depending on what the cost is. I would imagine it would take a 1st and an expiring. Or we would lose Joe's expiring and Clarkson. That's a whole lot of heart and soul leaving the building right there.
 
So Smart, Collins, and Grant are all part of rumors and are available. Honestly, I like all three due to their contracts, athleticism, ages, and skill sets. I would love to get one, two or even all 3 of these guys if there was that type of miracle.
 
LoPo said:
So Smart, Collins, and Grant are all part of rumors and are available. Honestly, I like all three due to their contracts, athleticism, ages, and skill sets. I would love to get one, two or even all 3 of these guys if there was that type of miracle.
Click to expand...
Move out Conley, Clarkson, Bogey or Royce, filler + picks and generate a multi-team trade to bring those guys here.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Move out Conley, Clarkson, Bogey or Royce, filler + picks and generate a multi-team trade to bring those guys here.
Click to expand...
I think Conley gets us Smart plus assets (probably Schroder and a pick), but I don't think he would get us Grant.

Maybe Bojan and the assets from a Conley for Smart deal can get us Grant in a three team deal.

The only way we can get Collins is by trading Rudy. I don't think we are ready to consider that yet but you never know.
 
I don’t understand what’s going on with John Collins. Numbers look legit but he’s been regressing the last few years which doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. More than that, why do the Hawks always seem so lukewarm on him?

I think I prefer him to all of Barnes, Grant, and Bogey looking at their numbers, but it feels like I must be missing something.
 
NUMBERICA said:
I don’t understand what’s going on with John Collins. Numbers look legit but he’s been regressing the last few years which doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. More than that, why do the Hawks always seem so lukewarm on him?

I think I prefer him to all of Barnes, Grant, and Bogey looking at their numbers, but it feels like I must be missing something.
Click to expand...
It’s partly a Trae problem. I think attitude issues were part of the problem coming out of the draft. He’s not a perfect piece to build around but still very good. Prolly one of those dudes you always want to be 25% better than he is… kinda like AK47.
 
I would like Smart and Barnes. If another player is sent to us who can defend the perimeter it's a bonus. I'm down to trade any combination of Ingles, Royce, Bogie, JC or filler. I would prefer not to send any 1st round picks.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
It’s partly a Trae problem. I think attitude issues were part of the problem coming out of the draft. He’s not a perfect piece to build around but still very good. Prolly one of those dudes you always want to be 25% better than he is… kinda like AK47.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but the core of the frustration with AK (besides not giving a ****) is that his skill set was weird and making him fit in any winning environment was difficult (a dude too weak to play PF, but can’t spread the floor, and who wants to run the offense).

ANYWAY, Collins seems like a perfect fit here? His numbers frankly crush (regarding efficiency) the dudes I just mentioned and it sounds like he is not prioritized in the offense at all. Good rebounder, decent secondary rim-protector.

I don’t get it. I mean, if he’s just a complete ******* I get it. But if the Hawks are just dumb the Jazz should go hard after Collins.
 
Move Bogey, JC, Ingles + [?] to bring in Smart and Colllins (or Grant secondarily) + maybe Schroder and/or sign journeyman vet 3&D guy, someone like House.


Also, ****ing sign House already.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Yeah, but the core of the frustration with AK (besides not giving a ****) is that his skill set was weird and making him fit in any winning environment was difficult (a dude too weak to play PF, but can’t spread the floor, and who wants to run the offense).

ANYWAY, Collins seems like a perfect fit here? His numbers frankly crush (regarding efficiency) the dudes I just mentioned and it sounds like he is not prioritized in the offense at all. Good rebounder, decent secondary rim-protector.

I don’t get it. I mean, if he’s just a complete ******* I get it. But if the Hawks are just dumb the Jazz should go hard after Collins.
Click to expand...
His defense isn't great. He was solid in the playoffs. He gets some stats though.

I like him... I think he's out of our price range. I think the Hawks put him out there because he has value and they know long term the situation with him and Trae isn't great. Trae is so ball dominant... like Harden and Luka... not everyone is gonna want to sign up for that. It may not even be shots... they just want to feel involved. You add in his completely ****** defense and guys fell like "why am I covering his *** just so I can watch him dribble and get the highlights".

I really do like Collins but the fit isn't completely perfect. He needs to be the roll man sometimes and I guess you could put Rudy in the dunkers spot, but it would mess with spacing a bit. I think John Collins puts up 25 a game someday on a team that is like the 10th seed.
 
I don't get the Barnes interest if it comes at the expense of Bojan. I prefer Bojan's shot making and familiarity to Barnes slightly better rebounding (his numbers will come down with Rudy). If there is some magical chairs stuff where we move Bojan for Smart and Royce and Joe for Barnes with draft stuff given out somewhere in there... then I get it. I don't think there is a big difference between Bojan and Barnes though.
 
I will say... two teams that are primed to make a stupid mistake are the Kings and Wizards. I'd be talking to them a lot. I also think Stevens in Boston could end up being bad. The Horford deal doesn't look great right now... I know they got off some money with Kemba but not sure they waive and stretch Al next year... not sure they should have voluntarily extended Richardson. Just because a guy is a good coach it does not mean they will be a good front office person.

Back to the Wiz... I'm calling them every day. Not even sure there is a match, but they are absolutely going to try and make a win now move to convince Beal to stay. They have a lot of pieces... not sure how desperate they get.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
His defense isn't great. He was solid in the playoffs. He gets some stats though.

I like him... I think he's out of our price range. I think the Hawks put him out there because he has value and they know long term the situation with him and Trae isn't great. Trae is so ball dominant... like Harden and Luka... not everyone is gonna want to sign up for that. It may not even be shots... they just want to feel involved. You add in his completely ****** defense and guys fell like "why am I covering his *** just so I can watch him dribble and get the highlights".

I really do like Collins but the fit isn't completely perfect. He needs to be the roll man sometimes and I guess you could put Rudy in the dunkers spot, but it would mess with spacing a bit. I think John Collins puts up 25 a game someday on a team that is like the 10th seed.
Click to expand...
I like Collins a lot, but I don't know if he's a perfect fit next to Rudy. I do think he gives us a fantastic dimension in the playoffs as a small ball center. He really helped Atlanta in that role last postseason.

I think Collins would be a fantastic #3 type guy, and he's close with Donovan. We would be wise to get him if we could for the long term vision of the franchise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top