What's new
By:

Trade Deadline

gregbroncs said:
Did I say that? I said the picks are worthless. For every Hood and Gobert you have far more Padgett's and Quincy Lewis'. Don't forget we bought that pick that was used for Gobert for peanuts.
Click to expand...

Has Lindsey ever missed on a draft pick in the late first round?
 
str8line said:
Think about 3 DUI's. Think about one DUI. Now think about another. Now think about getting a third. You have to be a colossal drunk to get three DUI's.

I love my bourbon but Lawson sounds like a train wreck. Not sure you can come back from those kinds of years of alcohol abuse. It's not like a normal injury.
Click to expand...

To be fair, maybe those are the only three times he's ever gotten drunk :)
 
Thee jazz fan said:
If I gave a damn what this troll thought I might have sent this in to be translated


My perfect dream scenario. Have something to talk about, then after the deadline sit back and watch the meltdown on jazzfanz from probtrade people.
Click to expand...

There is sayings where my country "You care a lot for not caring"
 
str8line said:
Think about 3 DUI's. Think about one DUI. Now think about another. Now think about getting a third. You have to be a colossal drunk to get three DUI's.

I love my bourbon but Lawson sounds like a train wreck. Not sure you can come back from those kinds of years of alcohol abuse. It's not like a normal injury.
Click to expand...

Isn't DUI a felony at 3? Guy might be doing serious jail time if he wasn't in the NBA.

I can attest that you only need to drive hardly drunk one time to get your first. It isn't like one DUI=crazy *** alcoholic who always drives after they drink, but if you do get that one, most intelligent people get the hint and don't drink and drive anymore. Despite what people say, DUIs are a huge deal, huge financial (for us regular folks) hit, serious legal issue (that can cost you your job in certain fields, or reduce potential job options). To get three... got to figure you actually have a serious issue or straight up DGAF if you kill somebody.
 
gregbroncs said:
That's impressive. You found a trade that the Hollinger rating says makes both teams significantly worse.
Click to expand...

Well this Lawson trade is banking on him performing even 70% of his 2014 levels. Obviously since he's been bad this year the machine is going to say he's a negative. You can't just base things on the trade machine...Billy King did that and look how the Nets turned out.

This is the proposed trade anyways (Burke/Booker for Lawson). Trade machine says the same thing without adding in Dekker.

https://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=gr6ynqz
 
Ty Lawson put up better numbers than Teague last year, and there's been no physical decline. AND his contract is unguaranteed next year.


These are the sorts of moves our small market team needs to make.
 
zyzz said:
Well this Lawson trade is banking on him performing even 70% of his 2014 levels. Obviously since he's been bad this year the machine is going to say he's a negative. You can't just base things on the trade machine...Billy King did that and look how the Nets turned out.

This is the proposed trade anyways (Burke/Booker for Lawson). Trade machine says the same thing without adding in Dekker.

https://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=gr6ynqz
Click to expand...


Sometimes you can't explain simple things to simple people. I learn this in my country.
 
zyzz said:
Well this Lawson trade is banking on him performing even 70% of his 2014 levels. Obviously since he's been bad this year the machine is going to say he's a negative. You can't just base things on the trade machine...Billy King did that and look how the Nets turned out.

This is the proposed trade anyways (Burke/Booker for Lawson). Trade machine says the same thing without adding in Dekker.

https://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=gr6ynqz
Click to expand...

This is a good point. I wouldn't mind Dekker. He's a player in that Hayward/Parsons Chandler mould that we could use going forward.
 
This is a thread in the Rockets subreddit:

"Lawson just posted "Utah (annoyed face emoji)" then deleted it".

Doesn't look like he's changed much from the last time he publicly bashed Utah.
 
KD's Framily said:
This is a thread in the Rockets subreddit:

"Lawson just posted "Utah (annoyed face emoji)" then deleted it".

Doesn't look like he's changed much from the last time he publicly bashed Utah.
Click to expand...

No I think that was the tweet resurfacing from 5 years ago that everyone is getting confused about because it is being retweeted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top