What's new
By:

Trade Deadline

Siro said:
I'll be supremely disappointed if we end up getting Mack for Burke. Another top 10 pick dumped for nothing. Just the kind of **** trade one has come to expect from this organization.
Click to expand...
Ya, id rather have the sucky dude already on the team than the sucky dude from another team
 
Lol. Kinda disappointed when you first heard about Jeff Teague but I guess it's better than nothing : /

Pros : Mack has size and a good PER (on few minutes though). He's cheap. We can keep it for cheap or just let him walk next year. We don't care about a 2nd round pick.

Cons : Everything else. Won't be enough to beat the Warriors.
 
GVC said:
He's barely playing this year. While Mack's .317 career 3pt% is ****, it's still a hell of a lot better than his percentage this season. Didn't you accuse someone else of being disingenuous in this thread?
Click to expand...

I said Mack was shooting 14.8% from 3 this season. Nothing else. Stating facts is disingenuous?
 
Now that we don't need to get a pg back for Burke, I'll bet we can upgrade the Backup power forward spot by trading Burke and Booker together.
 
I like his hustle, and think it'll be fun to see. More importantly, maybe this makes Gordon happy.
 
I heard Rudy needs friends to stay. Oh wait so does Favors. We aren't the Utah Haywards. Who cares what he thinks he is going to be the 5th best player on the team.
 
Avery said:
For what's it worth, I put this into the ESPN trade machine and it said our win share will increase by +32.
Click to expand...
Lololol
 
framer said:
Now that we don't need to get a pg back for Burke, I'll bet we can upgrade the Backup power forward spot by trading Burke and Booker together.
Click to expand...
Hmmm.interesting
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top