20/14 more like. Kanter and Love would eat up every damn rebound available.
Trade proposed on ESPN
- Thread starter crater77
- Start date
20/14 more like. Kanter and Love would eat up every damn rebound available.
That was Jeffy for Jose. Bargs would not be in that deal.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
Would you do this deal if Wolves would take Kanter instead of Favors?
orangello
Well-Known Member
I'd be much more willing to make that trade if those two were switched.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
On the Espn pre game show they talked about trades they thought should happen. They talked a lot about trades the jazz should pull off
Jalen Rose and the guys were discussing trades they think could happen, or would like to see happen before the Rockets/Celtics game. So there's nothing to it rumor wise. Just interesting to get some national opinion.
This! Dare I say that Al's defense is better than Love's...certainly his interior defense.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
This was just before the start of Rockets Celtics game tonight.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to UGLI baby again.
Guy who made up this trade must be a Blazer fan. The Jazz get screwed and so do the Wolves.
Aldridge isn't better than Love and throwing in Millsap and Favors just makes it more ridiculous.
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
No to any deal that has Jefferson staying.
orangello
Well-Known Member
This.
CitizenofCapua
Well-Known Member
That must be the top priority.
orangello
Well-Known Member
It is.
green
Well-Known Member
I say no to the trade. I don't like Love that much. He is a fantastic rebounder and a good offensive player but plays NO defense. Love and Jefferson both have 2 assists per game. Al has 1 TO, Love has 2 TO. Love is averaging 35% fg this year, 20% from 3. He is whining and complaining about being in Minnesota. He plays no defense. He plays no defense. He plays no defense.
I have just lived through the Boozer and Jefferson era (hopefully). I have two young bigs who play defense and have potential that can equal/surpass Love. And I know we love to over-rate our players, but Kanter and Favors could be the real deal, unlike so many of the players we have hoped for (Alec Burks). Why would you give that up?
We all whine about wanting top picks, but are ready to throw away one that we actually do have for a very, very good player, but a player that has never led, never won, never done what we want a player to do. Love is a Boozer-type player.
No thanks.
Priority #1 for the Jazz: Get a new coach.
Priority #2: Make sure Al is gone.
After that, the sky is the limit.
I have just lived through the Boozer and Jefferson era (hopefully). I have two young bigs who play defense and have potential that can equal/surpass Love. And I know we love to over-rate our players, but Kanter and Favors could be the real deal, unlike so many of the players we have hoped for (Alec Burks). Why would you give that up?
We all whine about wanting top picks, but are ready to throw away one that we actually do have for a very, very good player, but a player that has never led, never won, never done what we want a player to do. Love is a Boozer-type player.
No thanks.
Priority #1 for the Jazz: Get a new coach.
Priority #2: Make sure Al is gone.
After that, the sky is the limit.
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
Nope. I just don't think Love is the answer. If they take Millsap and trash for Love it's a go. But if we have to also include a young big then I say no. I see Favors and Kanter as a pretty good front court going forward. Kanter the offensive player with Favors the defensive guy. With both not being completely worthless on the other end of the floor.
Hell I'd probably trade Millsap and Jefferson for Love. But Favors feels like a throw in on that trade. He is worth more than a throw in and so is Kanter.
jazzfan1971
Well-Known Member
I'd rather have Favors than Kevin Love. Not a fan of Kevin Love.