What's new
By:

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

I say yes to the laker picks but I don’t think they can protect their picks with no seconds. They are only allowed to trade out so far so they can’t protect them with no way for the picks to convey.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Lakers are still not going to give up both picks. Danny needs to give them a deadline then Cleveland them. Let them try to sell Broklyn on a deal involving Poetl and San Antonio. See how that goes.

At some point the back deals we have in place may dry up while we wait on these morons.
 
Bodhi said:
I’ll concede it’s worth 2 protected picks but not 3. Highly likely it’s a great pick but still could end up being average with the lottery.

Also you’re basing the swap off NOP’s current form. I think it’s reasonable that they bounce back and end up middle of the playoff pack in the west.

Anyway, I think that’s too much to give. I’d want both picks or hold back a dude from that trade.
Click to expand...
Trying to not be a homer… but sure… I get it.

With regard to NO… uhhhh they been trash for a while and honestly maybe their start was the outlier. They made the playoffs last year but weren’t even .500. I would guess they end up in the 18-22 range… it’s still 6-8 spots minimum… maybe more.
 
HeatCheck said:
I don't know if Boston has much to trade but the more suitors the better!
Click to expand...
I don’t know either… the salary isn’t great and they likely pay a ton more in tax.
 
sip said:
That defeats the purpose for the knicks. They would want to add more firepower to go with Quickley off the bench.
Click to expand...
Well they would also get off a trash contract and IQ will need a bigger role eventually and that won’t happen with Brunson.

Dudes a starting level PG imo


Basically I just want IQ so any Knicks deal I just want to yell out “GIVE US IQ!!!!”
 
Last edited:
I was on the fence about Beasley until recently, but now I'm all the way out on him. He needs to go. His ideal role is a bench spot up shooter on a short leash, and I'm afraid Hardy would keep playing him too much after we give him a pretty big extension.
 
The Knicks probably won’t give up Quickley. Are we still on the Quentin Grimes hype train or was that just last year?
 
Tremendous Upside said:
I was on the fence about Beasley until recently, but now I'm all the way out on him. He needs to go. His ideal role is a bench spot up shooter on a short leash, and I'm afraid Hardy would keep playing him too much after we give him a pretty big extension.
Click to expand...
Yes the highly overrated list for us goes 1) Beasley, 2) KO, 3) Vando.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top