Trump Is The New JFK

[babe]

Don't hate the playa, hate the game

JFK was the most universally liked President we have had in my lifetime, more than Reagan. He had a doctor, sometimes described as "Doctor Feel Good" or something, who prescribed methamphetamine for pain. Kennedy was borderline incapacity with back pain.

During WWII, the United States Air Force routinely doped flyer's coffee with meth, to give them the endurance to make long long flights. Nobody told the flyers they were being doped.....

We know now that meth impairs some brain centers, including the centers for inhibition or moral reasoning. In children, Ritalin, a meth analog, induces calm behavior, but in adults it induces the reverse.

So this forum is filled with little people, people who are all about just tearing down someone who disagrees with them. Some Saul Alinskite political activists who pursue a method of persistent rhetoric some might for good reason believe are lies, just to dominate the political landscape. I have no respect for people who conduct business in that manner.

JFK was going to pursue a currency policy that the banking establishment disapproved. Whoever killed him was in some manner serving that interest group. Lyndon Johnson reversed the idea and did what was wanted. Nixon got too big for his britches and thought he had real power, but no. Pretty sure the democrats hired "plumbers" and others to place wiretaps on the Republicans, even then.

Anyone who thinks the dems didn't do illegal surveillance on their opponents, or that the Dems and even RINO republicans didn't "conspire" with British folks for the sake of British interests, is just unrealistic, uneducated. Mitt takes political contributions for foreigners all the time, notably Brits.

Trump is nobody's patsy. He cuts his own course. The "leaks" on Hillary came from her illegal server, the "leaks" on the DNC came from disgruntled Bernies. Not saying the Russians missed anything, or that the Russians don't cultivate "friends" in US political circles, like any other country with interests and means.

But what is going on is a wholesale attempt to overthrow a fair election. The only reason it's happening is because an outsider, Trump, won.

 

[babe]

You missed the part in my post where I said that I don't smoke weed apparently. Maybe you are the one that is high lol.

I didn't miss the threads where you said you did some years ago, when you were younger. You were pretty persuasive telling me I was wrong about saying it affects people. You stated how you do your job and do it well.

Look, the effects described in the research are researched to determine the effects on different age groups. The effects are not extreme, just statistically significant. Some think there might be a decline of oh maybe 5 to 8 IQ points, others say no, the study didn't measure initial IQ and therefore, maybe it's just a trend that people with lower IQ use weed, who knows. The effects are represented to be permanent because of the impact on brain development.

I know a person who lost a whole hemisphere of brain, a literal "half-brain". I observe some difficulties in coping that are reasonably attributable to that. Pot isn't anywhere near that extreme.

But everyone who believes pot has no effect whatsoever should, perhaps,read the studies, and reconsider.

https://headsup.scholastic.com/students/endocannabinoid

 

[fishonjazz]

I didn't miss the threads where you said you did some years ago, when you were younger. You were pretty persuasive telling me I was wrong about saying it affects people. You stated how you do your job and do it well.

Look, the effects described in the research are researched to determine the effects on different age groups. The effects are not extreme, just statistically significant. Some think there might be a decline of oh maybe 5 to 8 IQ points, others say no, the study didn't measure initial IQ and therefore, maybe it's just a trend that people with lower IQ use weed, who knows. The effects are represented to be permanent because of the impact on brain development.

I know a person who lost a whole hemisphere of brain, a literal "half-brain". I observe some difficulties in coping that are reasonably attributable to that. Pot isn't anywhere near that extreme.

But everyone who believes pot has no effect whatsoever should, perhaps,read the studies, and reconsider.

https://headsup.scholastic.com/students/endocannabinoid

You are silly. You don't take into account any of the things from my post that did have an actual effect on my mistakes (my bosses agree that I have been working too much and too fast btw) and instead focus on something that had nothing to do with the mistakes made that you know nothing about. Lol. You are quite funny.

Btw I know of a handful of co workers who smoke pot daily and they have a total of zero write ups.

So ya, I'm going to go with what I know to have contributed to my errors and make the appropriate corrections to how I go about my job and go back to ignoring your dumbass nonsensical rants that you pull out of your *** lol.

 

[fishonjazz]

Babe be like, no one has ever made an error due to not having the appropriate time off from work or from being too busy and rushed. The errors must be due to the ****ty low grade weed he was smoking 16 years ago.

Not too mention the fact that I had an impeccable track record during the first 14 years at my job but then that dirt weed from long ago just happened to rear it's ugly head coincidentally right at the same time that I'm working more than I ever have before and my plant is setting production volume records on a near weekly basis.
Nice time to show up and effect my work performance crummy weed from over a decade ago.
LOL

 

[Gameface]

I have your number. You know nothing. I won't dignify your comment with a "sir" because I don't give oblique insults gratuitously. You believe what you believe, you are what you are. You don't care to look at information contrary to the wholly-owned Rockefeller/CFR Press, which is a far cry from a "free press", it is an insane asylum for mesmerized believers in fantasy.

Trump is not my idea of a great leader, neither is JFK or FDR. I see the value of the ideas. Trump is on board with more investment in the Space Program. yes, he wants to drain the swamp in DC and so far it looks like the aligators are in a feeding frenzy.

I like Putin and Russia. I don't think Putin is a Moral Paragon but he is rational. I don't believe the likes of Mark Levin calling him a KGB jailhouse murdering thug. Putin's KGB gig was in Germany, where he learned German and Western culture and values. I don't think the hype about his bad stuff is as credible as the hype about Hillary's bad stuff.

Putin is not an American, he is a Russian. You can count on him to act for Russian security concerns. Trump is an American, and you can count on him to act for American security concerns, finally, after years of Clintons, Bushes, and Obamas who were just nuts for phasing the US down to size politically and militarily and culturally to remove the "stigma" of American Exceptionalism.

It is unfortunate Trump is not a Constitutional scholar, though it's not unfortunate he has business management perspectives on re-structuring our government. I can understand how that might alarm some folks, but I think the alarms are unjustified. Trump is a big-hearted American who might talk the talk to get conservatives votes, but he's more of a liberal than many CFR acolytes or paid leftwing stooges who believe their political daily talking points. Which is what I actually think Red is, and a lot of other JFC hangers-on. Come on people, can't you suspend your vicious bile and just talk about stuff?

I stopped reading at Rockefeller. What a joke.

Edit, and babe, I guess you didn't get the reference to the 1988 vice presidential debate where Sen. Benson told Dan Quayle he was no Jack Kennedy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWXRNySMW4s

 

[b_line]

Good lord, babe is so pretentious. And also a moron

 

[babe]

You are silly. You don't take into account any of the things from my post that did have an actual effect on my mistakes (my bosses agree that I have been working too much and too fast btw) and instead focus on something that had nothing to do with the mistakes made that you know nothing about. Lol. You are quite funny.

Btw I know of a handful of co workers who smoke pot daily and they have a total of zero write ups.

So ya, I'm going to go with what I know to have contributed to my errors and make the appropriate corrections to how I go about my job and go back to ignoring your dumbass nonsensical rants that you pull out of your *** lol.

I haven't stated that whatever happened was actually weed effects. Who knows. You might not know yourself. What I am talking about is your self-assured know-it-all attitude. Sure, make the case. Go do your job and do it good. But the cumulative effects of weed subtract from human potential if anything, certainly no plus. I thought maybe you'd have sense to look at something that might be worth understanding. Obviously, NOT YOU. You're more interested in just running others down.

Obviously, weed impairs driving and other motor skills for a time, and changes some rewards and pleasure centers, and is somewhat addictive for many people. Cannabis oils are lipophilic, and cross the blood brain barrier readily, and disrupt nerve cell membranes causing their effects. Ordinary metabolism and transport do clear the load so the direct membrane effects are short term. But the cannabinoids are now known to be chemical messengers important in directing neural development, the growth of axons and the interconnections made between neurons.

Nobody with good sense would consider all that unimportant.

So what you are about is blowing off a comment, saying you're some kind of superior or perfectly competent person, calling others dumbass without even listening to what is actually said.

If what you say is true you have no reason to feel insecure about your job, and I don't need to worry about eating the yogurt you make. Even with what I've said, I believe you do a good job and I don't worry about my yogurt.

What I am concerned about is the climate of political rhetoric in here, which you apparently run with, which generally attacks others with differing views with personal attack rants and pompous dismissals. Really, bro, life could go on without mocking anyone.

 

[babe]

Good lord, babe is so pretentious. And also a moron

look at your fist, one finger pointing at me, three pointing at you. I'd say three against one you're the pretentious moron lording it over the whole world with political judgments. But hey, you've got a little cell of allies in this little corner of the webz, you're good, right.

Right.

 

[babe]

I stopped reading at Rockefeller. What a joke.

Edit, and babe, I guess you didn't get the reference to the 1988 vice presidential debate where Sen. Benson told Dan Quayle he was no Jack Kennedy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWXRNySMW4s

David Rockefeller himself wrote about his life work on building an interconnected new world system, and he thanked the MSM media for their faithful service and observance of discretion enabling his work to go forward behind the scenes. You just don't read anything about it the news. .. .

“"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years … It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years,” he said at the 1991 Bilderberg meeting.

https://defiantamerica.com/david-ro...al-banker-advocated-new-world-order-dead-101/

The fact is established. I am absolutely correct, and you're just not willing to think it through.

 

[fishonjazz]

Silly babe

 

[babe]

So, it looks like all the usual suspects have weighed in with nothing useful here. Good Lord, you people argue against JFK because he used meth and was unhinged sexually in a time before meth was studied for it's effects, and then here is the Great Debate about cannabinoids because Hell, nobody is ever affected by anything "fun".

How is Dan Quayle relevant to JFK. He was a straight arrow. Benson was invoking the myth of JFK being the greatest to put Quayle down. All Quayle was doing was saying JFK led by some principles he respected in actual governance, noting that the Dems were no longer in that tradition.

So go ahead Einsteins, search the webz for cute stuff that you think makes your point, but pleeeeze get off the weed or whatever and ask the question whether it makes your point or destroys it;.

 

[The Midnight]

Nope, no medical condition and don't smoke pot or use drugs.

My little incidents were mostly due to being overworked (I have worked at least 6 days per week every week since august with many 12 hour days included and sometimes multiple weeks without a day off at all . One of the incidents happened on new years eve, a saturday which is supposed to be my day off, while working a 12 hour shift after having worked the previous 8 days in a row) and working too hard and being too rushed (the other incident happened 5 minutes into my shift as the previous shift was behind on our work and i rushed to get us caught back up. Also I was consistently making more batches of yogurt daily than my counterparts. I have since slowed way down and am looking out for myself now instead of looking out for my company like I was before.)

And admittedly the first incident happened partially due to tons of repition causing me to get a little complacent. (Though if I were getting the proper amount of time off then I probably wouldn't have had as much repetition and maybe wouldn't have been as compacent)

Also, I have only called in sick to work once in the last few years (my back went out to the point that I literally laid on the floor of my living room for about 24 hours straight.... which the doctor told me made it worse. Have to keep trying to move it to get it to loosen up. ) and have not been late to work in like 10 years or so. I was also often skipping my breaks and lunches. (No longer doing that anymore)

So, like usual, you are wrong again and just talking out your ***.

Carry on

Damn, sounded like a tough company to please/work for. Doesn't seem very understand at all. They want you to work long hours but then strike you hard when you make a mistake.


Are you getting good raises/promotion out of this job? Is there any reason why you still stick around all these years? With your level of dedication that you have shown it seems to me that you could do much better in another company that appreciate that kind of dedication & genuine-ness.

 

[babe]

Fun Stuff

So I actually went and looked at the legendary Quayle blunder.

Did you know the context? Quayle was young as Kennedy was, and did have the equivalent experience. Perhaps unlike Kennedy, Quayle was a "Company Man" for his party. Kennedy was more charismatic. Quayle actually was an effective Senator, and competent, and didn't do meth or bang the women.

It was hard for Benson's campaign people to find a weakness, which they needed. Benson was an old fart, not charismatic or even really sharp-witted. More of a dunce than Quayle for sure.

So during the campaign Quayle was drawing the comparison of age and experience with Kennedy, had used it multiple times in the lead-up. Benson's campaign manager decided to exploit it. JFK's brother Ted declined to blow off on it as a bad campaign tactic or untimely, but Benson's man decided to use it.

Benson didn't want to use the remark, but was persuaded, and was rehearsed repetitively and coached on delivery and camera angles. The moderate tried repeatedly to sucker Quayle into the trap, three times Quayle didn't bite. The fourth time he just got annoyed,and walked into the trap.

The moderator, the so-called objective and fair "moderator" on the Main Stream Media, was in the tank to destroy Quayle.

All this admitted, or bragged about by the LA Times, folks.

"Finally, the moment came. Quayle probably sensed the trap.
During the debate, he answered questions about his qualifications several times without mentioning Kennedy. Finally, when the question was repeated again by moderator Tom Brokaw, Quayle looked annoyed.
Bentsen’s staff was huddled in the bowels of the convention center, watching nervously on television.
After explaining what steps he would take if forced into the presidency —*and all the gravity that moment would entail —*Quayle*invoked Kennedy."

https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-debate-quayle-bentsen-20161004-snap-story.html

What a beautiful piece to prove my point about the worthless lying Media being all on board with Rockefeller's dream.

 

[babe]

Damn, sounded like a tough company to please/work for. Doesn't seem very understand at all. They want you to work long hours but then strike you hard when you make a mistake.


Are you getting good raises/promotion out of this job? Is there any reason why you still stick around all these years? With your level of dedication that you have shown it seems to me that you could do much better in another company that appreciate that kind of dedication & genuine-ness.

It's overall a good job, and the people there are pretty decent. Fish is a good bro ordinarily, gets along well with folks. He's got a future there, but hey it's in rural Utah where Fish likes to be.

I really rubbed him all the wrong way today, and he's sore. I oughtta apologize. My point was only that he's pretty dismissive and not really contributing to a discussion with an unthought gratuitous lol in post number 2.

 

[babe]

Here's some more on Dan Quayle. The article shows he was a pretty effective Vice President and a big help the George HW Bush. Significantly, he tried to talk George HW outta his biggest political blunder, one that cost him the 1992 election.

https://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/2017/01/17/reassessment-dan-quayle-vice-president/96670656/

So, no thanks to our yellow lying media, Quayle and Bush won the election anyway, and Quayle did a good job for the conservatives in the Republican Party.

 

[babe]

So in advising Bush I against raising marginal tax rates, Dan Quayle actually was standing up for the same idea JFK employed in stimulating our economy. He really did actually invoke a JFK political idea, the exact same idea that Trump is invoking in restructuring our tax laws.

And in case someone actually interested in principles that have made America Great historically comes around, here is Trump's speech:

https://larouchepac.com/20170326/pre...xploration-and

 

[Gameface]

So I actually went and looked at the legendary Quayle blunder.

Did you know the context? Quayle was young as Kennedy was, and did have the equivalent experience. Perhaps unlike Kennedy, Quayle was a "Company Man" for his party. Kennedy was more charismatic. Quayle actually was an effective Senator, and competent, and didn't do meth or bang the women.

It was hard for Benson's campaign people to find a weakness, which they needed. Benson was an old fart, not charismatic or even really sharp-witted. More of a dunce than Quayle for sure.

So during the campaign Quayle was drawing the comparison of age and experience with Kennedy, had used it multiple times in the lead-up. Benson's campaign manager decided to exploit it. JFK's brother Ted declined to blow off on it as a bad campaign tactic or untimely, but Benson's man decided to use it.

Benson didn't want to use the remark, but was persuaded, and was rehearsed repetitively and coached on delivery and camera angles. The moderate tried repeatedly to sucker Quayle into the trap, three times Quayle didn't bite. The fourth time he just got annoyed,and walked into the trap.

The moderator, the so-called objective and fair "moderator" on the Main Stream Media, was in the tank to destroy Quayle.

All this admitted, or bragged about by the LA Times, folks.

"Finally, the moment came. Quayle probably sensed the trap.
During the debate, he answered questions about his qualifications several times without mentioning Kennedy. Finally, when the question was repeated again by moderator Tom Brokaw, Quayle looked annoyed.
Bentsen’s staff was huddled in the bowels of the convention center, watching nervously on television.
After explaining what steps he would take if forced into the presidency —*and all the gravity that moment would entail —*Quayle*invoked Kennedy."

https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-debate-quayle-bentsen-20161004-snap-story.html

What a beautiful piece to prove my point about the worthless lying Media being all on board with Rockefeller's dream.

Dude, I wasn't making an analogy comparing anything to Quayle. You said Trump is the new JFK, I said Trump is no JFK. That's it. That's as deep as that joke goes. Benson got a sweet burn on Quayle and I thought it would be funny to play on that.

You're wasting you're time in me. I am not interested in your ideas about British elites pulling our puppet strings. I'm a peasant. That **** has nothing to do with me.

 

[fishonjazz]

Damn, sounded like a tough company to please/work for. Doesn't seem very understand at all. They want you to work long hours but then strike you hard when you make a mistake.


Are you getting good raises/promotion out of this job? Is there any reason why you still stick around all these years? With your level of dedication that you have shown it seems to me that you could do much better in another company that appreciate that kind of dedication & genuine-ness.

Eh, it pays good for my skill level/education level and has really good benefits. Never had any issues in the past so while I feel upset about things currently, in a year the write ups will be gone and I will be happy at work again like I was before.
I feel a little bit scorned currently. I feel like I consistently go above and beyond my job duties and felt that both write ups were not necessary but I will get over it.
Just have to slow down and be extra careful for the time being.

 

[fishonjazz]

It's overall a good job, and the people there are pretty decent. Fish is a good bro ordinarily, gets along well with folks. He's got a future there, but hey it's in rural Utah where Fish likes to be.

I really rubbed him all the wrong way today, and he's sore. I oughtta apologize. My point was only that he's pretty dismissive and not really contributing to a discussion with an unthought gratuitous lol in post number 2.

I appreciate this post and ya I was upset by what I felt was some kind of accusation at me and responded a bit harshly maybe.
Good day sir, carry on.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[The Midnight]

Eh, it pays good for my skill level/education level and has really good benefits. Never had any issues in the past so while I feel upset about things currently, in a year the write ups will be gone and I will be happy at work again like I was before.
I feel a little bit scorned currently. I feel like I consistently go above and beyond my job duties and felt that both write ups were not necessary but I will get over it.
Just have to slow down and be extra careful for the time being.

Ah ok, so the write up disappears after a year, that's good news.