What's new
By:

Trump's dictator to-do list

fishonjazz said:
I hadn't heard about this before: Trump has pledged to sign an executive order revoking birthright citizenship, which is enshrined in the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.
Click to expand...
He pledged to do that in 2015, won election in 2016, and didn't do it.
www.vox.com

Birthright citizenship and “anchor babies,” explained

Vox is a general interest news site for the 21st century. Its mission: to help everyone understand our complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. In text, video and audio, our reporters explain politics, policy, world affairs, technology, culture, science, the climate crisis, money...
www.vox.com www.vox.com

Then he pledged to do it in 2018 when he was President, and didn't do it.
www.vox.com

Can Trump end birthright citizenship? We asked 10 legal experts.

Not exactly, but it could get complicated.
www.vox.com www.vox.com

Now he's pledged to do it again. Meh. Even if he does, it will be struck down by the courts. The language on that one is pretty clear.
 
Al-O-Meter said:
He pledged to do that in 2015, won election in 2016, and didn't do it.
www.vox.com

Birthright citizenship and “anchor babies,” explained

Vox is a general interest news site for the 21st century. Its mission: to help everyone understand our complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. In text, video and audio, our reporters explain politics, policy, world affairs, technology, culture, science, the climate crisis, money...
www.vox.com www.vox.com

Then he pledged to do it in 2018 when he was President, and didn't do it.
www.vox.com

Can Trump end birthright citizenship? We asked 10 legal experts.

Not exactly, but it could get complicated.
www.vox.com www.vox.com

Now he's pledged to do it again. Meh. Even if he does, it will be struck down by the courts. The language on that one is pretty clear.
Click to expand...
Different courts/judges. Different administration. Different time.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
fishonjazz said:
Different courts/judges. Different administration. Different time.
Click to expand...
The difference is 4 years. It will be a Trump administration working with a 6-3 balance on the Supreme Court exactly like it was 4 years ago. The language on the 14th is clear. The intent of the 14th Amendment is clear. Despite the fearmongering of SCOTUS being nothing but a rubber stamp, judges appointed by Trump are originalists. They will side with the 14th Amendment.
 
Bucknutz said:
Man we read the same thing and think 2 different things
Click to expand...
True. He's making fun of the democrats finances. Since he has an image as a businessman dealmaker he's suggesting he could help out the debts the Dems accumulated because of all the bad deals they made during the campaign.

Helping with the campaign debt of your opposition is not a thing. It would not be accepted by the Dems, regardless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
Bucknutz said:
This is a nice unity offer:


View: https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/1855269671554941384?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ
Click to expand...
That is nice but he should probably pay his own bills that his campaign owes first.
newrepublic.com

Trump’s Unpaid Rally Bills Add Colossal Sum to Already Staggering Debt

Several cities are accusing Donald Trump of holding events and then fleeing with unpaid bills.
newrepublic.com newrepublic.com

www.newsweek.com

Donald Trump chased over unpaid debts for his rallies

Five cities are seeking more than $740,000 from Donald Trump over their assistance for past campaign events as far back as 2016.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com


Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Sardines said:
Time will tell.
Click to expand...

Again, I have $10,000 that says there will be a huge shift toward authoritarianism from The Rapist this time. Let's see what happens if there's a single protest. Dead serious. Any of you Trumptards want to bet me?
 
Bucknutz said:
I’m trying to find anything positive that might show that Trump is trying to be better than his first term.
Click to expand...
I love the chief of staff hire. As much as it might seem to be the opposite, Im rooting for trump to be successful and do a good job. I will still call him on his BS though.

Im hopeful that since he cant get re-elected (unless he somehow finds a way lol) maybe he will be less controversial.
 
fishonjazz said:
Im rooting for trump to be successful and do a good job. I will still call him on his BS though.
Click to expand...
Everyone should call him on his BS. The First Amendment should have started with "To call out government officials for their BS, the freedom of speech shall not be abridged". Nothing is more American than optimism combined with straight talk.
 
Last edited:
fishonjazz said:
I love the chief of staff hire. As much as it might seem to be the opposite, Im rooting for trump to be successful and do a good job. I will still call him on his BS though.

Im hopeful that since he cant get re-elected (unless he somehow finds a way lol) maybe he will be less controversial.
Click to expand...
Frankly in the end all we can do is hope. IMHO he lost out on "the benefit of the doubt" when he left ZERO doubt that he intends to skirt all responsibility for crimes he was convicted of and fomented an insurrection. He lost that. Now he needs to show what and who he is. And all we can do is hope he isn't as maniacally evil as he has virtually literally told us he is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top