Well, I suppose I'm just hopelessly pessimistic where Trump's presidency is concerned. It has been a struggle, to say the least, for me to understand how such diametrically opposed views of the guy can exist. It's only natural that anyone hopes others will agree with one's opinion. In this instance, I just don't understand how the nature of his demagoguery is not more readily recognized by more people.
I recall at rallies, when protestors were led out, he would point to them and tell the crowds that the protestors were the "worst Americans", and other derisive terms to stigmatize protest as representing anti-American points of view. And while there was violence from both sides at times, the truth of the matter is that the protestors were mostly the very people he marginalized and scapegoated in his speeches, so how could there not be protestors at his rallies?
He marginalized the press as well, by always keeping them in cages during his rallies. I would not expect relations with a free press to be any better during his term. The whole net effect, through his rallies, his conspiracy theories, and his tweets is to make sure his followers thoroughly despise, and regard as the enemy, anybody who dares to criticize him or object to any policy he promotes. If that's the strategy for governance, it seems an irresponsible tact to take. It sounds like it will resemble the "America, love it of leave it" motto of the right during the Vietnam era. But it will be Trump's America, and to oppose it will incur his wrath, and that of his followers.
For Trump, there is going to be only one acceptable America: the America who supports him with no criticism whatsoever. And that is, and always has been, the attitude of dictators throughout history. Those won over by his demagoguery will never waver in their support. For some, it's like a cult of personality. And I suspect his style will be that of a personality cult much more then that of an American President with the responsibility of being a leader for all Americans. His New Year greeting a preview of what's to come in that respect.
I expect many of Trump's supporters to embrace the wrath he directs at critics and encourage an environment where dissent won't go down well at all. For the dissenters. He calls this a "movement" after all. Even if that movement is just self-aggrandizement in disguise. Not that it will go down easy. The Resistance to Trump will not simply go away. Not as long as he insists on labeling that resistance as the enemy and as anti-American, as the "worst" of America. Those blind to the technique of the demagogue won't recognize any of this. But we are now moving in the direction of a "civil war", and Trump's New Years tweet is just one more way that he seems to be saying. " bring it on".
He's expanding his scapegoating to include half the country, in other words.
By pounding on the "losers", rather then any effort whatsoever to be inclusive toward all.
Would it really be expecting, and asking, too much of the man to tweet a greeting that made Americans feel good about themselves? In a jaw dropping sort of way, by way of a tweet, Trump says yes, it's asking too much.
The truth is I would like nothing better then to understand Trump's support better then I'm sure I do. Much better. I don't pretend that everything written above does not reflect a bias that must be missing something. Nobody has perfect understanding of history, or the reasons for the rise of Trumpism. Certainly not I. By coincidence, I ran across an article that sought to throw light on the rise of Trump by relating it to a rise in fondness for authoritarianism. It might be easier for me to understand Trump supporters if I do see them in light of a trend toward authoritarian rule in general:
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...oritarianism-that-has-drawn-so-many-people-in